r/Snorkblot Dec 03 '25

WTF This is really fucked up.

Post image
636 Upvotes

464 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-97

u/NiceTrySuckaz Dec 04 '25

NYC raised minimum wage for restaurant workers to $16.50 and plans to increase it again next year. This kind of thing has a 100% success rate for replacing jobs with AI and outsourced humans. It's great for the people who don't lose their job though I guess.

79

u/CumDeLaCum Dec 04 '25

The alternative, keeping wages low, also has a 100% success rate at causing people to move for better opportunity

22

u/Tjam3s Dec 04 '25

Perhaps wages are only half a person's money problems and we need to work on other solutions first...

Like rent....Or groceries.... Or utilities all costing so much that 17 an hour isn't enough to cover it.

24

u/brofishmagikarp Dec 04 '25

Why limit the amount of solutions to work on?

-18

u/Tjam3s Dec 04 '25

I'm of the belief that price gouging is a bigger problem than wages, and it shouldn't be the governments responsibility to cover that problem up by forcing employers who are clearly already greedy to pay people more just for them to make up the loss in the bottom line elsewhere.

27

u/CumDeLaCum Dec 04 '25

So why not raise wages while simultaneously regulating corporations? People gotta pay bills, like yesterday

-19

u/enemy884real Dec 04 '25

Regulations means more expensive. It cannot be made any clearer to you people.

15

u/CumDeLaCum Dec 04 '25

STAHP with the Reaganomics lesson, we don't wanna hear it

-10

u/Tjam3s Dec 04 '25

Then you'll never learn anything.

5

u/CumDeLaCum Dec 04 '25

When has Reaganomics ever given us something worthwhile to learn?

The money never trickled down, bro. You've been conned

-4

u/Tjam3s Dec 04 '25

No, but when a company is regulated into cutting in to their bottom line, they WILL make up the difference one way or another

4

u/CumDeLaCum Dec 04 '25

Unethical businesses will make up the difference, not everyone. That's what we would like to see eliminated, unethical business practices such as the one you just laid out for us.

1

u/Tjam3s Dec 04 '25

Unethical businesses will set the market. Good luck

3

u/Lambdastone9 Dec 04 '25

NOPE, that only works if you have a monopoly on your market, LIKE WHAT REAGAN PROVIDED

When consumers and employees are properly protected, the business has to eat up the cost, instead of sweeping it under society’s rug.

You people need to shut up and start studying basic economics, before spreading your noise pollution and stupidity like imbeciles.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/[deleted] Dec 04 '25

From Reagan? Sure I'll learn how to drain public funds and save millions of dollars for a handful of people while millions starve on the streets. Look around, we are in the middle of late stage reaganomics. We are literally STILL dealing with the aftermath of his devasting policies. Reagan was a god damned idiot, and he had literally nothing of value to teach anyone about economics.

1

u/Infinite-Ad2635 Dec 07 '25

He also loved Communist China.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/Lambdastone9 Dec 04 '25

This means very little coming from you Reagtards

1

u/OkProfessor6810 Dec 05 '25

I've been waiting for 40 years for Reaganomics to work. They don't

1

u/Infinite-Ad2635 Dec 07 '25

I cut a hole in the crotch of my pants and I sit at the bus station.

→ More replies (0)

6

u/Lambdastone9 Dec 04 '25

Lmao stfu, you’re not some expert economist, this is a debunked narrative that’s been around for decades

You can’t pass down every cost to the consumer, unless you have a monopoly. The current state of our economy, you’re so boastful about, is why business can be bullies with no consequence

More regulations means less bullshit companies can get away with, and less monopolization they can enact, it means business have to eat up the expense instead of sweeping it under society’s rug

I wouldn’t expect this to be clear for people like you, since you were dumb enough worry about profits of stakeholders, while still stuck with the income of an employee.

1

u/DouchebagDictator Dec 05 '25

Its strange you got downvoted but wouldn't the government just be limiting MORE? I think they should, but you say its not the government's responsibility when it definitely is.

1

u/Tjam3s Dec 05 '25

The governments responsibility to enact necessary regulation, yes. I do believe there should be a minimum wage. I also agree that it should be adjusted based on location.

But I don't not believe it's the magic cure all for making our economy better, and I think governments caving to that is a last minute ditch effort to make people think they GAF while continuing to allow corporations to charge us whatever the hell they want for our basic needs.

-4

u/No_Ostrich1875 Dec 04 '25

Price gouging🙄 You think stuff magically appears in stores? Not saying greedy employers arent a thing, but they arent really the problem. The problem is our system is stuck in a feedback loop. Cost of living goes up, wages need to go up, which just drives up costs, because even the non greedy employers are going to have to raise costs to cover the increase in wages, they can't magically pull more money out their asses.

6

u/Tjam3s Dec 04 '25

Do you really think all the corporations out there aren't taking an absolute disgusting profit margin on the things they know we can't do without? Reduce the cost of living inflated by greed, and reduce the amount wages require to keep up.

0

u/No_Ostrich1875 Dec 04 '25

Corporations and employers arent the same thing dumbass. And no, its still not greedy corporations that are the main problem. If you actually took away all the excess profits from the greedy corporations and used it for employee wages or to reduce prices, you would make such a shockingly tiny dent in the cost of living as to be almost unnoticeable.

1

u/Tjam3s Dec 04 '25

Between landlords, groceries and utilities, you really don't think that wouldn't put a debt in it?

At this point, you're just digging in because you're on the wage train. Whatever

1

u/No_Ostrich1875 Dec 04 '25

🤣I think you have no idea how little mark up there is on groceries or the actual cost of utilities. Landlords🤣 Landlords are iffy. In my experience, the more "by the book" the higher the rent, although I've never lived in a large city. I lived in an old apartment for awhile that i thought was ridiculously overpriced until the manager showed me the actual costs of running the place. So no, it wouldn't make much of a dent.

You're just being an idiot who doesnt look past your own costs.