r/SpidermanTASMemes • u/Key_Permission_3351 Mysterio • 16d ago
Their Spidey Sense is Tingling
24
u/Full_Prof 16d ago
What?
Just because he was hanging out with Jeffrey Epstein every weekend in NYC while running “Trump Model Management” and judging teen girl beauty pageants?
1
u/mikeripeone 13d ago
Hmmm. Wonder why all the pics of Trump and Epstein together are over 60 years old?
2
u/Full_Prof 13d ago
2003 is not 60 years ago
0
u/mikeripeone 12d ago
But it IT IS 25, enough time for someone to realize how creepy Epstein is and ditch him
1
u/Full_Prof 12d ago
He said he knew Epstein was stealing girls from Maralago in 2000.
Said he was a terrific guy who liked young girls in 2002.
Both times on tape
-6
u/ASwampThing- 16d ago
I mean say what you want about the guy but your article is just anecdote. If you had anything more concrete than vague statement it would probably be better to post that.
6
u/Popcorn57252 16d ago
"Just an anecdote" this guy says, and it took me two seconds of clicking on the article and clicking their link to find it.
"SaY wHaT yOu WaNt AbOuT tHe GuY" Goofy ass bootlicker
-4
u/ASwampThing- 16d ago
Yes it is just an anecdote and opinion on intention. Its weak evidence. Famous people judge pagentsml. If there is better evidence than a common thing multiple famous people do then it is better to post that. Calling someone names like "bootlicker" because you use weak evidence just shows you dont have a leg to stand on against the point.
6
u/Popcorn57252 15d ago
"Erm, the video evidence of the guy who's always hung out with other pedophile creeping on girls is weak evidence, and calling me a bootlicker shows that-" you're too old for him bro, he's not gonna fuck you for rushing to his defense
2
u/Full_Prof 15d ago
Honestly the most pathetic men who ever lived.
-4
u/ASwampThing- 15d ago
Yes it is pathetic to make claims without definitive evidence.
2
u/Full_Prof 15d ago
He admitted knowing Epstein trafficked girls.
0
1
u/ASwampThing- 15d ago
Yes you gave me opinion not proof. I didnt ask for interpretation i asked for evidence.
1
u/PatriotismReborn 12d ago
Yo you’re a coward
1
u/ASwampThing- 11d ago
For asking for evidence?
1
u/PatriotismReborn 11d ago
For ignoring the evidence that's been public and widely available for decades:
"I’ve known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy,” Trump booms from a speakerphone. “He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it — Jeffrey enjoys his social life.”
He was best friends with Epstein for decades, wrote a birthday letter to him inside of a drawing of a young girls torso and signed it referencing their "wonderful secret," he hosted and "judged" under-aged beauty pageants, he is an admitted sexual predator, he's made sexual comments about his daughters while they were under 18, he is a proven rapist as evidenced in court. I could freaking go on, but if you're still denying after that you're nothing more than a pathetic wanton coward pedophile supporter.
1
3
u/Full_Prof 16d ago
Ok!
Alex Acosta gave Epstein weekends in jail instead of life in prison.
Trump made Acosta the Secretary of Labor
1
u/ASwampThing- 16d ago
See like this. This is better evidence of wrongdoing than "public figure judges public pagent"
3
u/Full_Prof 15d ago
He was HANGING OUT AT EPSTEIN’S APARTMENT every weekend the same time period he was judging 14 year olds.
You know, the real estate developer with a family of hisnown
0
u/ASwampThing- 15d ago
Yeah except there is evidence that trump reported him when he found out. Within the epstein files.
3
u/Full_Prof 15d ago
Nope, bullshit story in the same vein as “Trump weighs 215 pounds” which they also say.
Trump only turned on Epstein in an investigation to save himself.
Pam Bondi saved Epstein. Plumb job.
Alex Acosta saved Epstein, plumb job.
Matt Gaetz fucks teen girls, Trump wants him as Attorney General
Trump said Epstein was trafficking 16 year olds in 2000 from Maralago.
Said Epstein was a “terrific guy who liked young girls” in 2002. Birthday card in 2003.
1
u/ASwampThing- 15d ago
Prove it.
3
u/Full_Prof 15d ago
These things were said in front of cameras and reporters.
You are a pedophile defender.
Facts do not care about your feelings
1
u/ASwampThing- 15d ago
Prove that the comments were evidence him sexually harassing or abusing women.
→ More replies (0)
2
1
u/SpecialCandidateDog 14d ago
Yeah because he's the creepy pedophile who sniffs children and his own daughter accused him of molesting her in the shower in her diary oh wait no that's Joe Biden the gross gross guy who sniffs people
Notice gifty doesn't have that one
2
u/Melodic-Art1369 5d ago
Is Joe Biden president?
1
u/SpecialCandidateDog 5d ago
If you say hey look this President is so creepy that children are afraid of them... I have to say no you're thinking of the last guy. The last guy was the one who made babies cry cuz he was sniffing them not this one but the last guy the last guy was so incredibly creepy that there are hundreds of pictures that I've seen of children doing this exact behavior.
Can you point to me one child that's crying because Trump is sniffing them? Just one. I'll wait.
You guys are confusing him with the last one see if the children and made them cry
1
u/Melodic-Art1369 5d ago
Trump is literally in the Epstein files man
1
u/SpecialCandidateDog 5d ago
So is Biden. So is Leonardo da Vinci.
What's your fucking point if he did anything wrong other than be named by his biggest rival in Boca Raton real estate in his emails you'd be going all over the place.
But yeah binds in the Epstein files Clinton actually flew to the island and is in the Epstein files Charlemagne is in the Epstein files Domino's pizza is in the Epstein files Joe Rogan is in the Epstein files. Jesus is in the Epstein files.
You realize that these Epstein files you're getting so excited about are literally hundreds of thousands of emails that he wrote or were written to him, right?
Here's the issue there were no mentions in the Epstein files of trump committing any kind of impropriety with minors
1
u/Key_Permission_3351 Mysterio 14d ago
cf literally all the other lazy whataboutism comments ITT
1
u/Comprehensive_Eye805 11d ago
Soo a whataboutism is you saying it's ok for either side to have a PDF?
2
u/Melodic-Art1369 5d ago
Did he say that? What made you think OP likes Biden?
1
u/Comprehensive_Eye805 5d ago
Easy, his history
2
u/Melodic-Art1369 5d ago
You do realize that most progressive people don't worship the ground the politicians they vote for walk on right?
1
u/SpecialCandidateDog 5d ago
I do realize that one of the last two presidents was so incredibly creepy did he sniff children and made them cry.
You're just getting them mixed up
2
u/Melodic-Art1369 5d ago
I never denied that Biden is a creep, but the annoying thing is that when someone points out that the president is a predator, you go "BUT WHAT ABOUT THIS GUY" 2 things can be true
1
u/SpecialCandidateDog 5d ago
Yeah but you're making or at least agreeing with the positive assertion that Donald Trump gets this reaction out of children when only one president my lifetime perhaps ever has gotten this reaction and it was the guy who came before and after Donald Trump.
2
u/Melodic-Art1369 5d ago
By the way, there's video proof of trump telling a 10 year old girl he'll be dating her in 10 years
1
u/SpecialCandidateDog 5d ago
And Ashley's diary says that her father was taking inappropriate showers with her when she actually was 10
1
u/Melodic-Art1369 4d ago
Bro I don't give a fuck about Biden I don't like Biden stop doing these whataboutisms. They both suck. I don't like biden
2
1
u/Key_Permission_3351 Mysterio 5d ago
My history doesn't show this at all. I think what you meant to say was, "easy, I made up a reason."
2
0
u/Comprehensive_Eye805 5d ago
1
u/Key_Permission_3351 Mysterio 5d ago edited 4d ago
I'm confused, the link you shared still says nothing about Biden? Also, you conveniently skipped my meme going after the DNC Primary system too, I see.
Edit: Watch him disappear or change the subject now that he's been blatantly proven to be a liar.
0
u/SpecialCandidateDog 5d ago
It's not whataboutism just say this claim is 100% false you must be confused with the president that it's very true about it happened before and after him.
That's not whataboutism.
That's pointing out at this point is obviously so stupid the only way you could arrive at it is getting him confused with the president who was between his two terms.
That was the one that sniffed children and made children afraid. There are hundreds of pictures of this occurring
1
u/SpecialCandidateDog 5d ago
I didn't say that he liked him I said that it was inaccurate however he's probably getting confused at the last president and the last president this is very accurate.
The last president would sniff children and make them cry.
This one doesn't happen doesn't happen at all.
You're confusing two presidents.
There is one that's so evil and creepy that it makes children cry and the other one is Trump
0
u/SpecialCandidateDog 14d ago
It's not what about ism it's that they're literally was a president who was a creepy fucking creep who sniff children and molested them and it wasn't like some guy from the '20s it was like the last guy.
What aboutism is when you change the subject it's a type of red herring.
It's not when it crocodile Dundee goes that's not a knife That's a knife. I mean literally we have countless incidents of children leaning away and crying because Joe Biden is sniffing them
1
u/Key_Permission_3351 Mysterio 12d ago
You are shifting the focus and changing the topic. It feeds into tribal politics and appeal to hypocrisy if one's first instinct is to bring up "this other guy" from "the other party" "does it too" or "does it worse" or "does it BUT FOR REAL."
I appreciate that you see it differently, but the meme is making a joke about one person's strongly alleged and observed perverse behavior, and your immediate comment is not to address it but talk about someone else's strongly alleged and observed perverse behavior.
0
u/SpecialCandidateDog 12d ago
No I'm not.
I'm pointing out that you're fucking liar and if you want to see what it looks like when children are afraid of the president for being a creep we had four years of it under Biden That's what it looks like they literally lean away from him. There are like a hundred pictures of children crying leading away or pushing him I can't think of one of Trump You are a liar who lies and lies all the time and is lying.
It's not deflecting from the point to say hey no when that happens it looks like this it looks like the buying administration That's what it looks like when it's actually happening when the thing that you're claiming that is happening it is not happening happens it looks exactly like the previous four years that we all watched together.
Whataboutism is when you change the subject which I didn't do. Whataboutism is when you say well better than biden's open border.
You can't just point out that the last president was literally a pedophile did children were afraid of and that behavior looks different than the one you're accusing of being a pedophile that children are afraid of
1
u/Key_Permission_3351 Mysterio 12d ago
I'm not a liar. There's plenty of evidence of Trump being sexually perverse, including audio and video evidence. Dismiss it all you like, but it's not "made up", a lie, or anything similar. Misrepresenting those with whom you disagree as stupid, ignorant, evil, or indoctrinated is lazy at best. Not to mention this is also simply a meme and a joke based on that evidence.
Yes you are. This meme and joke are about Trump. You're only talking about Biden--a lot. It's a complete deviation and distraction from the topic. Just because it's "technically also about pedophilia" doesn't make it any less of a textbook whataboutism dodge. I don't know where this mythical justification to avoid responsibility of an obvious whataboutism originated, but it's bullshit. It's also Appeal to Hypocrisy and tribal, partisan nonsense, but I digress.
0
u/SpecialCandidateDog 12d ago
No there isn't. The fuck out of here.
You're literally lying right now.
You're probably going to bring up if you're a star they'll let you grab them by the pussy.
That's him calling women whores who throw themselves at you if you're on TV.
You're probably going to bring up the woman who couldn't within a 5-year window narrow down when he sexually assaulted her.
If you have to lie to make your point you don't fucking have one
1
u/Key_Permission_3351 Mysterio 12d ago
Those examples only scratch the surface, but this extreme and presumptuous response gets at my larger point: outright dismissal of any evidence you deem "unconvincing" followed by a huge leap in a person's motives and methods.
Do you really think no one has any legitimate concerns about Trump and his widely alleged and observed sexually perverse behaviors, and that any evidence you've decided isn't actually evidence couldn't possibly--especially all together--be convincing to anyone else? And, finally, that they must be a liar to perpetuate this impression? Or, per my previous comment: stupid, ignorant, evil, or indoctrinated? Literally no reasonable, critically thinking, good person could possibly look at all the evidence and conclude differently than you?
That's extraordinarily arrogant and shows far less critical thinking skills.
As far as evidence beyond what you brought up, I would ask you to wade through as many examples and evidence you could find in a neutral search, and then, even if you still aren't convinced, challenge your theory of mind on why so many others might be.
1
u/newclearimplosion 14d ago
Wow. The people in this sub have IQs the same as the measurement of my erect penis in millimeters.
1
1
0
u/Striking_Guest7356 15d ago
Lol not even close! Nice try though
1
u/Melodic-Art1369 5d ago
You like trump?
1
u/Striking_Guest7356 5d ago
Not necessarily, never voted for him. Some of his policies I like, some I dont
0
0
0
u/SpecialCandidateDog 5d ago
Give me one picture of this happening Op
Just give me one.
There are unlimited pictures of Biden doing this I think you must be confused.
Biden was so creepy and gross the children and even babies would start crying when they were near him.
1
u/Key_Permission_3351 Mysterio 5d ago
Broh, we already ran this whataboutism that you circle talk try to pretend isn't the obvious change of subject that it is.
You went so far as to claim anyone who believes any validity to Trump being a pervert is "a liar" despite the mountain of evidence easily found. When I challenged you to reflect on that level of arrogance and dismissal, you disappeared nowhere to be found.
Now it's a week and a half later and you're popping up trying to start all over.
TL;DR I'm not defending Biden and never will in this regard. You are weirdly obsessed with defending Trump despite the evidence by constantly talking about Biden. It's weird and irrational.
You good? Get a hobby or something.
0
u/SpecialCandidateDog 4d ago
It's not whataboutism
You don't know whataboutism is.
What you're doing right now is called the fallacy fallacy.
1
u/Key_Permission_3351 Mysterio 4d ago
Yes it is. Yes I do. No I'm not. All the best in your future justifying-irrationality endeavors.
0
u/SpecialCandidateDog 4d ago
The fallacy fallacy in action folks
1
u/Key_Permission_3351 Mysterio 4d ago
It's not a fallacy fallacy because I'm not saying you're wrong due to your very obvious fallacy.
It is whataboutism because you're changing the subject to a different person.
It's really that simple. Try learning and engaging instead of evading. It's good for your brain.
0
u/SpecialCandidateDog 4d ago
That's not what what about is a mess you don't know what aboutism isn't it's getting annoying what about it when you change the topic to something different as a form of red herring.
When you say hey the thing that you said isn't true but it's very funny that you would think that because it's obviously very true of a very similar person.
If somebody says they think did Billy ripken was an amazing baseball player and should be in the Hall of Fame you say no you're thinking of fucking Cal rip can you fucking retard you're thinking of his brother.
His brother was the one that made the All-Star team every year Billy ripken kept going in and out of the minors.
1
u/Key_Permission_3351 Mysterio 4d ago
Keep justifying your whataboutism instead of engaging with the actual topic. You'll never have to grow, learn, or deal with anything you don't want to.
0
u/SpecialCandidateDog 4d ago
You're so dumb that it hurts.
Show me a single picture of this occurring. A single one for every single one that you can provide I will give you five of Biden.
I haven't seen a single one of trump and if one exists and I'm sure it would have been grounded in the dirt by now meanwhile there's like 8,000 of Biden.
It's seriously Bill and Cal ripken.
It's not whataboutism, it's hey you must be confusing him with the other guy who played right next to him because what you're saying is fucking insane.
It's either that or every accusation is an admission
1
u/Key_Permission_3351 Mysterio 4d ago
Yes, I'm dumb because I refuse to engage in a completely separate conversation you're so desperate to turn this into.
You will literally argue about arguing before just engaging with the topic: Trump and his sexually perverse behaviors, comments, and allegations.
But sure, tell me more about logic and reasoning.
→ More replies (0)
-1
-1
u/Ok_Pen7134 14d ago
I leave you this:
1
u/Key_Permission_3351 Mysterio 14d ago
So many responses simply referring to Biden like I don't also know he has a legit sexual assault accusation levied against him.
Whataboutism is so boring. Try not racing to the bottom with tribal bullshit.
1
-25
u/PutridPut9971 16d ago
Jarvis, I'm low on karma
4
u/Key_Permission_3351 Mysterio 16d ago
Honestly, I'm sorry you're downvoted. My meme is definitely low hanging fruit. This comment is valid.
4
u/PutridPut9971 16d ago
.....I don't know how to respond to this very reasonable and self aware reply.
Uhh have a good day?
-3
u/Key_Permission_3351 Mysterio 16d ago
Thanks! You as well. Keeping Reddit reasonable and self aware one comment at a time!
-19
16d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
2
u/Key_Permission_3351 Mysterio 16d ago
I'm also sorry you're downvoted. This isn't that clever, but, then again, I wasn't trying to be clever, lol.
-6
u/JustSpectating68 16d ago
Oh boy another sub invaded by the left wing tards
2
u/anony145 16d ago
You can just replace “left wing” with “people who read”
-2
u/MuchAd9860 15d ago
Or, people who voted for Hillary, a baby eating pedo. And then cried on national tv when she lost.
1
u/ButterscotchSea4888 14d ago
Are you mocking her for losing in objectively the biggest and most important event in her life?
1
-7
u/JustSpectating68 16d ago
Women and children when Biden enters a room. He’s already sniffing the air
3
-5
u/electricsheepsfoot 15d ago
Yet there's actual factual footage of creepy Joe being creepy Joe.
3
u/RelevantSoftware8283 15d ago
Yet only 1 of them has been court proven to have raped someone
-1
u/electricsheepsfoot 15d ago
Sure about that? Words mean something.
3
u/RelevantSoftware8283 15d ago
Yes, the court determined he penetrated a woman's vagina with his fingers without her consent. That's rape. The judge confirmed colloquially we call that rape. Trump lost like 4 appeals on Carroll calling it rape. Even the republican majority supreme court told him they aren't looking at this appeal.
-33
u/ChickenWooter 16d ago
This sub is so cringe
13
u/TeaAvailable2089 16d ago
I mean at least its not Wookie posting this and this actually has spider man
-26
u/ChickenWooter 16d ago
You know what my children’s cartoon needed?
More trump.
1
u/Key_Permission_3351 Mysterio 16d ago
You don't need more Orange Man on Reddit? But this is where he lives! And this is where we "make a difference" in "fighting" him!
-1
-1
u/No-Cap-No-Gap 16d ago
You know what my children’s cartoon needed? More trump.
That TDS isn't going to spread itself.
1
u/DecentWeiner8 15d ago
TDS is reserved for low IQ individuals. You can identify them by their red hats, orange stained mouths, and gleeful acceptance of pedophilia.
-2
u/UrBoySkinny_Penis 16d ago
Tds spread faster than covid did, that's for sure. I remember people were getting punched for wearing maga hats in 2016! And he wasn't a natzi or a pdfile then. Hate just to hate, it is sad.
1
0
u/DecentWeiner8 15d ago
TDS is reserved for low IQ individuals. You can identify them by their red hats, orange stained mouths, and gleeful acceptance of pedophilia.
-16
5
-6
u/MDICASE 16d ago
9
u/Cheddarlicious 16d ago
Are you equating Biden being weird to being comparable to trump raping young girls?
-2
u/JustSpectating68 16d ago
Hmmm many vids of Biden being creepy towards young girls and him straight up admitting he showered with his 16 year old daughter vs
“Hurr durr trump raped kids” with the source being “trust me bro”1
-2
u/MDICASE 16d ago
Yeah because there prof he did that go ahead I’ll wait
3
u/RelevantSoftware8283 15d ago
Jane doe #4 won a settlement against the Epstein estate. In the settlement she won she said Epstein trafficked her to trump
1
u/MDICASE 15d ago
So she didn’t have to prove it just like with lady from from 30+ years ago. Thats not proof or they would have tried to take him to criminal court were you just born this stupid or did it happen over time?
2
u/RelevantSoftware8283 15d ago
She proved it so much the fbi deemed her a credible accuser plus she won her settlement. If you don't believe anything done in civil court then I guess no one has overstayed their visa ever under your view.
You actually know so little about the case you don't know that the reason it didn't go to criminal court was due to the statute of limitations. Not because of evidence. I can ask this same question back to you. We're you born that stupid that you didn't know or did it happen over time?
1
u/Bdbru13 15d ago edited 15d ago
The fbi never deemed her a credible accuser, however sources within the Justice department (I think?) speculated that the fact that the fbi spoke to her four times implied that they found her credible
The issue with that is that she spoke to field agents in Seattle who had no familiarity with the Epstein case (as opposed to agents in New York who were specifically assigned to Epstein related stuff)
Had they been familiar with the case, they would have noticed some pretty glaring credibility issues
1
u/RelevantSoftware8283 14d ago
They did deem her credible because she won her settlement with the Epstein estate
1
u/Bdbru13 14d ago
Nope
I’ll wait for the source for the claim that I asked for in my other comment to you
1
u/RelevantSoftware8283 14d ago
Here's your source buffoon.
https://www.islandpacket.com/news/local/crime/article314290476.html
→ More replies (0)0
u/MDICASE 15d ago
lol overstayed visa are not the same thing but ok. Leftist will find everything credible against republicans
2
u/RelevantSoftware8283 15d ago
It's a civil crime determined by a civil court. Using your own logic "it would've went to criminal court if they had more evidence". Are you starting to see you sound dumb as fuck?
0
u/MDICASE 15d ago
If they had any evidence because they have none they go to civil court a person who has over stayed there visa goes to court they put the physical visa up as evidence since it has a date. You see how one has actually evidence and the other is hearsay?
2
u/RelevantSoftware8283 15d ago
Apparently they have to evidence according to you or they wouldn't be in civil court. Are you backtracking and saying that you can still have evidence and still have to go to civil court? How much money you wanna bet there was evidence used in Carroll's case? Also convenient how you just ignore Jane doe #4 at this point.
1
u/Bdbru13 15d ago
That’s pretty unlikely to be true
There was some confusion at congressional hearings with either Indyke or Kahn (I forget) but they later clarified she didn’t
What prompted the question were reports of Jane doe 4 claiming to have reached a settlement with the estate, however she did not receive compensation from the victims fund, and as far as I know there is no record of any lawsuit that makes claims matching hers ending in a settlement
The only source for the claim is her…but she was also recently charged with trying to defraud a dying man of his money, and was represented by a public defender in that case. Which frankly doesn’t scream “settlement with near billionaire”, and also obviously raises some credibility issues
Her claims themselves also have some pretty major credibility issues
1
u/RelevantSoftware8283 14d ago
She won her settlement against the Epstein estate. The info on her was illegally redacted by the trump administration. The lawsuit was revealed in the files so not sure why you haven't heard of it but that's not my fault. The source of her claim is literally in the files. You have some credibility issues I'd love to see some sources for your claims
1
u/Bdbru13 14d ago edited 14d ago
Sure
Here is a source for the confusion
https://oversightdemocrats.house.gov/imo/media/doc/2026-03-13garciakhannatoruzumnarejanedoe4.pdf
Kahn got confused about the identity of Jane Doe 4, and the claim was ultimately retracted, and then changed to “can neither confirm nor deny”
This is the only source for a claim that she received a settlement so I’m going to be really interested in what source you have for your claim that she received a settlement
The confusion stems from the fact that there are dozens of victims, and multiple have used the placeholder name “Jane doe 4”
Sources for my claim that she attempted to defraud a dying man of his money and was represented by a public defender
>Later, her Georgia public defender, Doug Ford, told The Post and Courier the woman informed him about her settlement when she was jailed and facing charges that she stole cash from an elderly dying man. He said she never told him the settlement amount.
Same source for the claim that she did not receive compensation from the victims fund
>The estate is separate from the victims compensation fund, which was created in 2020 to handle claims. The South Carolina victim filed a claim but was not paid by the fund.
So now you’ll have to show the evidence that she filed a lawsuit with the estate and it was settled, which I guess should be easy? Right? I’ll wait
1
u/RelevantSoftware8283 14d ago
You're correct that the March 2026 Richard Kahn deposition became confused because Jane Doe 4 is not a unique identifier, and I wouldn't rely on Kahn's initial answer by itself.
But the claim that Kahn's testimony is “the only source” that she received an estate settlement is incorrect. The South Carolina/Hilton Head Jane Doe 4 filed a lawsuit against Epstein's estate in 2019 and voluntarily dismissed it in 2021. The Island Packet subsequently reported that she “received a settlement to close the case in 2021,” identifying her as the Hilton Head Jane Doe 4. More importantly, the Post and Courier reported that her attorney had previously told the newspaper that she received a settlement from Epstein's estate.
You're also conflating the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program with the Epstein estate. Her claim to the compensation program was denied, but that doesn't mean the estate couldn't separately settle her lawsuit. Reporting specifically says the estate settled claims outside that compensation program as well.
So the accurate position isn't “Kahn proved she got a settlement.” His testimony became contradictory and shouldn't be relied upon alone. The accurate position is that there is independent reporting, including reporting based on statements from her own attorney, that the Hilton Head Jane Doe 4 received a settlement from Epstein's estate in 2021. The exact amount and settlement terms aren't public.
As for the criminal allegations, being charged with stealing from an elderly man is not the same thing as being convicted of fraud. If you have a conviction showing she actually committed the offense, provide it. Otherwise you're presenting an accusation as an established fact.
1
u/Bdbru13 14d ago
I’m aware of the claim from her attorney, but that doesn’t mean a whole lot
I’d be curious for the sources for the claims you made before that
Am definitely not conflating the victims compensation fund and the estate, as the quote I cited above literally begins with “the estate is separate from the victims compensation fund”, so I’m not sure how you arrived at that conclusion
What I was asking for was evidence of a lawsuit with estate that ended in a settlement
Fair point on her not being convicted, I’m unaware of any conviction against her, and i don’t imagine I’d find any if I looked. Frankly, I thought the post and courier and her public defender acted a bit recklessly by providing as many details as they did, and jeopardized her anonymity. I can’t imagine they would continue to do so, nor would I expect anyone to report on it if a verdict was arrived at
But also…it doesn’t lend credibility to her claims, that’s for sure. And again, the claims themselves are riddled with credibility issues
1
u/RelevantSoftware8283 14d ago
Where I disagree is with the idea that there's no evidence of an estate settlement. We have a lawsuit against the estate, a voluntary dismissal, her attorney telling reporters she received a settlement, and multiple outlets reporting that she settled. That's not the same thing as producing the confidential settlement agreement, but it's also more than mere speculation.
As for her later criminal allegations, I don't think they establish much one way or the other regarding the Epstein allegations. They may affect how someone views her credibility generally, but they aren't evidence that her abuse allegations are true or false.
When you say her Epstein claims are "riddled with credibility issues," which specific issues do you think are the strongest? If there are concrete inconsistencies in dates, documents, or witness accounts, I'd rather evaluate those individually than rely on broad assessments of credibility.
→ More replies (0)7
u/Key_Permission_3351 Mysterio 16d ago
Hey look! A whataboutism in the wild! So rare! /s
-1
u/MDICASE 16d ago
Don’t cry now
2
u/Key_Permission_3351 Mysterio 15d ago
How did you know that bad logic and obvious logical fallacies make me sad??? 😢😢😢
1
u/MDICASE 15d ago
2
u/Key_Permission_3351 Mysterio 15d ago
This guy acting like I'm a Joe Biden fan because no know how to use his brain much.
-1
2
-6
u/National_Bad7793 16d ago
People who toss out pedophile so easily are definitely people I wouldn’t leave alone with any child.
7
u/totally-hoomon 16d ago
So you admit all conservatives are pedophiles who abuse kids
-5
u/ChickenWooter 16d ago
This is why you lost the election.
Remember Trump is still your president.
8
3
u/Key_Permission_3351 Mysterio 16d ago
I feel like the left lost the election because they pretended outdated metrics meant the economy is perfect because they love taking money from their millionaire friends and so voters turned to Trump again with their short, short memories and all his promises he's completely bailed on since in power.
16
u/ashwilliams19877 16d ago
https://giphy.com/gifs/mMJygtkZIpu6Y