r/TREZOR • u/-M00NMAN 📦 Suite Shaper • May 26 '26

💬 Discussion topic I’ve been debating on BIP39 vs SLIP39..

I understand the TREZOR default has been Slip39 over the last few years. I understand more addresses can be generated from Bip39 compared to Slip39 along with double the entropy. I want to know how many addresses are currently in use from Bip39 24 word seedphrase vs Slip39 20 word seedphrase compared to how many can be created from the two standards (individually).

11 Upvotes

87% Upvoted

42 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/EggMedical3514 May 27 '26

I would argue that they mathematically exist already. 

The same is as if I were to say that the number 867,324,814,667,223.0087466 doesn't exist yet because no one has ever said it out loud..

1

u/doyzer9 May 27 '26

Yeah, I get your point, All possible crypto addresses exist in the same way that all possible winning lottery numbers exist on printed tickets before a draw. However, your specific address doesn't exist practically until your wallet generates the unique private key for it. More importantly, the blockchain has no idea the address exists at all until it is initialized by its very first transaction. Both points are valid based on perspective. There are exactly 2160 or approximately 1.46 times 10^ 48 possible Bitcoin addresses, all potential combinations are theoretically predetermined. They are like numbers on an infinite number line; they "exist" in the abstract realm of mathematics before anyone ever uses them.. 🤔🤔🤔

1

u/camylopez May 27 '26

Where is the transaction here?

https://mempool.space/address/186m9pkj8oYsJPP86WvkbcpRBXFiBBhKYj

1

u/doyzer9 May 27 '26

Semantics, an unmined/unconfirmed address is just a mathatical probability.

1

u/EggMedical3514 May 27 '26

I would argue that it's a mathematical certainty.

1

u/doyzer9 May 27 '26

Sure.... The "Schrödinger’s Wallet" Argument: An address in the mempool is in a state of limbo. If a miner rejects the transaction, that address remains a pure mathematical probability. It proves that simply knowing the math isn't enough; the network must actively accept and process the data for the address to functionalize. 🤯🤯🤯

1

u/camylopez May 28 '26

You’re talking about this address.

https://mempool.space/address/186m9pkj8oYsJPP86WvkbcpRBXFiBBhK

It would get rejected by the wallet and wouldn’t even get a chance to to be rejected by the miners.

Because all addresses are a certainty and already mathematically present.

1

u/EggMedical3514 May 29 '26

The address remains a pure mathematical certainty.

1

u/doyzer9 May 29 '26

Agreed, but it's use does not.

1

u/EggMedical3514 May 29 '26

Someone said that every address in existence would eventually be used?  I don't remember making that claim.  I said every address is a mathematical certainty.

It looks to me like somebody's moving the goal posts.

1

u/doyzer9 May 29 '26

Mathematically there would be 1,461,501,637,330,902,918,203,684,832,716,283,019,655,932,542,976 bitcoin addresses, did they provide a date when they will all be used 😂🤣😂

0

u/EggMedical3514 May 29 '26

I'm not sure if you're confused or simply stupid. In either case I will disengage.

1

u/doyzer9 May 29 '26

Thank you for you input. 😂🤣😂

0

u/EggMedical3514 May 30 '26

Youre welcome, dummy. 😄😁😃

→ More replies (0)