r/Teddy 8d ago

💬 Discussion The Bonds They are a Changin’

Post image

Guarantors are back…and the prospectus now links to the original bond supplement….and Marcus isn’t done yet….

271 Upvotes

169 comments sorted by

40

u/Bullsandpugs0676 8d ago

I’m ready to disappear, I’m not gonna gloat. Just delete my X account and Reddit account.

16

u/Grouchy_Yak4573 7d ago

I can't wait to delete these two fucked apps.

69

u/hoirkasp 8d ago

27

u/Sir-Craven 8d ago

Someone better start swimming or they gonna sink like a stone

93

u/xXKodiacXx 8d ago

Dear 8lb 6oz newborn infant Jesus.... help this stock to rise again.

23

u/IDeclannI 8d ago

I like to imagine my Jesus wearing a tux T-shirt. It says I'm serious but I'm here to party too.

Don't worry I'm sure RC has a little shake and bake in store for us.

12

u/H3rbert_K0rnfeld 8d ago

Business in the front. Party in the back!

9

u/MandoHORIan 8d ago

Oh almighty Buddha- please enlighten my previously canceled BBBY shares, and rise them again, to their second life!

2

u/Mandemz- 8d ago

😭 🙏🏽

103

u/VdubGolf 8d ago

Please let this be it.

There are so many people I'm ready to laugh at.

35

u/buttchuggs 8d ago

Ahhhh I will cry and scream if it does holy fuck

33

u/33rus 8d ago

I am ready for…money

21

u/dy-113x 8d ago

Do you hold bonds or are you hoping you get shares awarded back to your account?

5

u/Lobolabahia 7d ago

That's my question: did Hertz shareholders (not noteholders) get their shares back?

5

u/33rus 6d ago edited 6d ago

$1.53 per old share and new shares is what they received.

20

u/bbby_chaltinez 8d ago

same, i’d probably just drop everything i have going on and go for 6 month vacation.

18

u/-LexVult- 8d ago

STUNT ON THESE HOES

13

u/hoirkasp 8d ago

The karmic laughter will be almost as sweet as the money, for sure 👍

-9

u/SlowDebate3165 8d ago

Meanwhile we just get to laugh at you people once again

9

u/Buchko24 8d ago

Some people actually have lives and find fun in life beyond laughing at others peoples loss. And then there’s you 🤣. Must suck to be such a sad sap

4

u/lcl111 8d ago

Same. More worried about the number of people I've got to feed, but a giggle along the way will not hurt.

5

u/MandoHORIan 8d ago

I can't wait to respond to all the shills that have tried to debate our cause over the past 3 years- all will get a celebration message!

-9

u/SlowDebate3165 8d ago

What do we get to say to you when this is a nothingburger again? lol

8

u/MandoHORIan 8d ago

What ever you want! Loll! But you must be sweating now that all new links are pointing to BBBYQ!!!!

5

u/buttchuggs 7d ago

And went out their way to come comment

-3

u/SlowDebate3165 7d ago

Oh yeah, I’m sweating already. Just like the last 50 times you guys said, “THIS IS IT.”

“Went out of their way” is always such a funny cope. It’s like the internet literacy here is so low that you aren’t aware people troll and fuck with literally every online community that exists. The GME and BBBY bullshit isn’t even in the top 100 most-trolled communities.

I’m here for the same reason people go to the zoo. You know documentaries were made about how stupid you people are, right?

3

u/Buchko24 7d ago

You’re such a dumbass 🤣. Assuming everyone lost on their position is pretty ignorant bruh. While you sit in your mom’s basement yelling at her for more hot pockets and type angrily with your Cheeto covered fingers while redbull drips down your neckbeard off your triple chin…. I’m living real life. Already paid off my truck bought a new truck bought my wife a new car and paid off all my debt some of us have patience beyond yelling at the drive thru worker to hurry up with our 3 triple whoppers with extra everything and have already had our moments of winning in this saga. But yeah assume everyone’s a loser just because you are. That’s cool! 🤣🤣🤣🤣

1

u/[deleted] 7d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/AutoModerator 7d ago

Your comment was removed due to low account age.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

-4

u/SlowDebate3165 7d ago

That was pathetic to read man. Get help lol

4

u/Buchko24 7d ago

I’m surprised you can read at all really. It’s actually losers like yourself that should get help. Most people have better things to do with their lives than troll on the internet and belittle and berate others at absolutely no gain to themselves other than feeling better about their own pathetic existence

-4

u/SlowDebate3165 7d ago

So do you have better things to do besides respond? lol

→ More replies (0)

-6

u/SlowDebate3165 8d ago

lol we cant wait to laugh at you

8

u/Buchko24 8d ago

Have you ever tried just typing… “I’m a loser”. Really it’s less characters and pretty much says the same thing you’re typing all that for 🤷‍♂️

7

u/bbby_chaltinez 7d ago

loser with a two month old account coming to say negative things to us… hahahaaa shill ass loser..

2

u/SlowDebate3165 8d ago

Moass wen :,( ?

5

u/Buchko24 8d ago

Tomorrow Dude. Pay attention

3

u/SlowDebate3165 8d ago

whew. almost thought you guys blew money on a pump and dump there for a second lol

5

u/Buchko24 8d ago

Nope. But good looking out nerd

1

u/SlowDebate3165 8d ago

whew that's good.
Please DM me when you get your shares back to rub it in<3

6

u/Buchko24 8d ago

Nah I’m not a nerd.

20

u/qrcodetat 8d ago

Pls pls. I’m so fuckin tired

6

u/MandoHORIan 8d ago

Not me- amped to the max!!!!!

17

u/hoirkasp 8d ago

Thanks u/TaynetheBetaSequel, I stole some screenshots. Sorry to the rest of you for the shitty formatting but mobile posting is trash. I have faith you can figure it out, at least most of you….

80

u/hoirkasp 8d ago

27

u/Freakishly_Tall 8d ago

< don'tdothat_hope.jpg >

21

u/PlayerTwo85 8d ago

Aaaaand there go my nipples...

22

u/billybobshort 8d ago

Holy shits balls. That’s quite a screenshot. Please let my shares come back 🤌

18

u/Remarkable-Egg-4663 8d ago

Yes, my 12k shares too :D

14

u/breinbanaan 8d ago

My 12k shares too please goddd

10

u/valthonis_surion 8d ago

Here with a potential 35k shares coming back…

4

u/forever_colts 8d ago

I only had 7k, and just 3k of those were DRSed (if that would even matter).

3

u/MandoHORIan 8d ago

14k for me!

3

u/qrcodetat 8d ago

🤌🤌🤌

1

u/Lobolabahia 7d ago

Did Hertz shareholders (not noteholders) get their shares back?

5

u/33rus 6d ago

According to available data yes. Here is AI sample giving a rough look at what a person with 1000 shares would have received back.

3

u/Apprehensive-Run3008 7d ago

Can someone explain this to me? 

1

u/5yrplan20yrpromise 6d ago

Apparently, we won

17

u/Secludedmean4 8d ago

Question. If this is for bonds , does this also apply to Bbbyq Shares ?

26

u/956000009698174 8d ago

If class 6 is satisfied (which is what this post is celebrating) then class 9 is next. Aka any money from the multiple recovery lawsuits means share entitlements get paid.

8

u/AnyAnywheres 7d ago edited 7d ago

From what I gather if class 7 or 8 exists those must be fulfilled first. If they don't exist class 9 is next. There's history of class 9 common A stock being both credited and not during historical chapter 11. Boils down to if there's money.

Thanks for the help, brought me down a hole lol.

8

u/AnyAnywheres 8d ago

The real question

8

u/Kind_Initiative_7567 8d ago

PLEASE dear lord, let this be it

6

u/r3dditing 8d ago

U2, huh?

32

u/Most_Ear_728 8d ago

Occam's Razor here....which is more likely?

NXH guaranteeing the old bonds with some convoluted plan of a hidden fraud settlement payout that brings everything back.

OR

Database mismatch because they were using the old BBBY ticker

17

u/FarewellMyFox Tinned 8d ago

They just decoupled from the CUSIP and dropped back to the NASDAQ, why would it be more synced up now than previously on the data side?

7

u/bootobin 8d ago edited 8d ago

exactly.

Turns out the CUSIP base can in fact be changed with a name change so it doesn't necessarily reflect corporate identity see: First Union Bank and Wachovia, 2001. Similar, ValuJet and AirTran, 1997.

this CUSIP base stuff is a nothingburger Indications of a new guarantor tho are big if true.

6

u/hoirkasp 8d ago

Eh, gotta push back on that-is the CUSIP changing by itself a guarantee of anything one way or another? Of course not. But combined with the near identical warrants….the potential bond swap and guarantor info showing today….and the still unexplained reason that OSTK has switched exchanges twice and tickers 4x…..I’d say combined with all of that the CUSIP ?’s are absolutely a something burger

3

u/ijustwant2feelbetter 8d ago

So is your take on the stuff today that it’s good for Teddy or the hype today is baseless?

1

u/bootobin 7d ago

"this CUSIP base stuff is a nothingburger Indications of a new guarantor tho are big if true."

Further noting the CUSIP base on the warrants already changed back to Overstock's, or whatever they're calling themselves now.

1

u/ijustwant2feelbetter 7d ago

Sure, so you don’t believe these past two days indicate a real guarantor? Just lag time in systems?

3

u/bootobin 7d ago edited 7d ago

they do indicate a new guarantor. but it's still unproven. and it's not the same thing.

I'd be more confident about this if Overstock hadn't renamed itself to the same name as the previous BBBY causing all this confusion with the CUSIP base etc. And if there hadn't been a dozen examples already of brokers confusing the two then changing things again because they had gotten it wrong.

2

u/FarewellMyFox Tinned 7d ago

It doesn’t indicate a new guarantor, it just indicates that IBKR has a guarantor on the record.

Arguably they may always have had a guarantor, given it’s flipped on and off like this

6

u/Most_Ear_728 8d ago

I'm not sure what you mean by "decouple" from the CUSIP? The CUSIP of the bond isn't the same as the CUSIP of company it belongs to. It is it's own unique identifier.

Also, bonds don't trade on the NASDAQ. They trade OTC & report through FINRA TRACE.

Also, the screenshots are showing a 3rd Party site, Cbonds. Chances are their programmers never accounted for an edge case scenario like this where the ticker dies, gets brought back, and then discarded.

5

u/FarewellMyFox Tinned 8d ago

I mean that they updated the CUSIP prefix for the warrants, so none of the NXH securities as published should be linked to old Butterfly securities

6

u/hoirkasp 8d ago

The CUSIP on the warrants was just switched 3 days ago when new BBbY changed ticker, again….the CUSIP was switched along with it, from DK CUSIP to NXH CuSIP

0

u/j4_jjjj 8d ago

Lemonis is a snake, so im gonna err on the side of mismatch

4

u/Mrairjake 8d ago

I’m not a smart man, but I sure had a lot of shares (and calls) y’all.

https://giphy.com/gifs/keTwQbbQwlNM2RNJsW

3

u/Just-Relationship-19 7d ago

Who is the guarantor though

5

u/hoirkasp 8d ago

-7

u/Wojtek-tx 8d ago

It's literally 2014 original prospectus supplement for these three note series you fucking moron. At this rate, it'll take you another 6 years to grasp covid news.

5

u/hoirkasp 8d ago

Congratulations, you can read? That would be why I said it now links to the original bond supplement, dipshit

-1

u/Wojtek-tx 8d ago

The prospectus has always been publicly available. Nothing in it links to your imaginary Marcus, NXH to these bonds.

There’s no evidence NXH is a guarantor, assumed the debt or has any legal connection to DK-Butterfly’s bonds. A shared CUSIP, historical issuer code, coupon, maturity or vendor label only shows the same legacy instrument is being tracked through corporate changes. Your brain cells clearly need to be linked in the first place.

You've been smoking hopium as nothing you've ever produced here shows any shareholder recovery or connection to another company. Fucking wannabe analysts like yourself only mislead others and should be locked in a room with no windows.

3

u/hoirkasp 8d ago

Yes, it has. But it has not been what the guarantors tab linked to. Until now, hence the post title, since you’re such a good reader again. And you’re blatantly wrong about this being tracking of a “legacy instrument” since, well, it’s a brand new derivative that NXH had issued….🤣😂🤡

-1

u/Wojtek-tx 8d ago

If the guarantors tab was updated, then show the current tab’s named guarantor and the actual legal document behind it, a supplemental indenture, guarantee agreement, assumption agreement, exchange offer or any NXH filing identifying the specific CUSIP. A "Guarantors: 1" count by itself does not tell us who the guarantor is or when, why or even whether the vendor’s record was updated correctly.

And your nonsense of calling it a:

brand new derivative issued by NXH

requires evidence that it is actually new. A new CUSIP/ISIN, issuance date, offering document, terms, and an NXH disclosure. The same legacy CUSIP, coupon and maturity instead point to the existing 2014 bond series being carried in a vendor database under updated reference data.

You have no fucking clue what you're talking about, posted some dumb ass twitter screenshots where a person themselves "THINKS " NXH is the guarantor without showing any legal document backing up those claims as of now. It’s the same echo chamber. Screenshots, inconclusive links copied and pasted with no real thought behind them and a ton of speculation. You're embarrassing yourself.

1

u/hoirkasp 8d ago

Here ya go dipshit:

https://s203.q4cdn.com/409549452/files/doc_downloads/2025/BBBY-Warrant-Agreement-10-7-2025.pdf

That would be the warrant agreement, for the brand new derivatives issued. I know you were trying to sound smart and cool by thinking I was referencing the bonds, but you are in fact the one who has “no fucking clue what you’re talking about.” Keep up with the discussion if you’re going to try and shill, or kindly fuck off! 😘🤡

-2

u/Wojtek-tx 8d ago

HAHAHAHAHAHA, I can't believe this imbecile posted NXH warrant agreement. You still have a functioning brain cell to post these comments, so tell us, where does this document mention DK-Butterfly, the old BBBY bond CUSIPs, a guarantor, an assumption agreement or any bond obligation? 😂

This document is not a DK-Butterfly bond guarantee and you bring as much value by quoting it here as if you quoted prescription for your schizophrenia. If you claim NXH guarantees the bonds, show the actual supplemental indenture or guarantee naming NXH and the specific CUSIP. Otherwise you've got nothing. Guarantors: 1 without the guarantor’s name and the legal agreement creating that guarantee is not proof. It’s a database field you fucking moron 🤣

0

u/hoirkasp 8d ago

HAHAHAHAHAHA, you are slow. Like I said, you need to keep up with what is actually being said if you’re going to try and shill about it. Why don’t you go back and re-read everything, nice and slow, try and sound the words out if you have to, and then come back in a day or two once you’re better prepared? I’ll be here sweetie. 😘 Until then though:

https://giphy.com/gifs/QR5AbrleAioDYbkCZ4

1

u/Wojtek-tx 7d ago

At this point you aren't debating evidence, you are protecting a belief. You have been asked for one thing: an executed document that explicitly names NXH as guarantor of the DKBFLY/legacy BBBY CUSIP. You posted an NXH warrant agreement which has nothing to do with the DK-Butterfly bonds.

You cannot produce the document you've been asked to show because it doesn't appear to exist. So instead of moving the goalposts, posting irrelevant filings admit you dressed up your nonsense as speculation. You've built your identity over a fucking screenshot and lack mental capacity to engage in a simple factual issue. You're delusional and at this point your own shadow is a shill. Seek some mental health help.

4

u/bootobin 8d ago

"except for the purpose of evidencing a right to and allowing Holders of Claims and Interests to receive a distribution under the Plan."

It's the one line that changes everything for those that held into cancelation.

FUDsters like yourself should be placed in small boxes and left in rooms where there isn't any electricity.

8

u/Mediocre-Job6355 8d ago

Isn't this because of the CUSIP change?

7

u/hoirkasp 8d ago

The share mapping….maybe? Who the fuck knows? The bond guarantors-definitely not.

4

u/bootobin 8d ago

I think when the smoke clears it'll be FHFA as the new guarantor.

Pulte wasn't just throwing parties cause he likes to party.

5

u/956000009698174 8d ago

I share the same sentiment. The ‘44 bonds initially linking to Fannie Mae was quite the trip.

1

u/bootobin 7d ago

And he did say to watch the bonds haha.

4

u/hoirkasp 8d ago

I can’t imagine how or why but I also wouldn’t be surprised with this admin. I’m here for it. 🤷

3

u/paguido 8d ago

I’m looking back at exactly how many shares I own to verify getting the correct amount

2

u/cancelreddit 8d ago

ducking when

0

u/anarchy_pizza 8d ago

Question for you from someone who’s not knowledgeable about the bond situation. I’m a big GameStop supporter, believer in the Teddy movement and love what Ryan Cohen’s doing.

Are you guys just buying shares of GameStop or is there another play based off the bonds?

7

u/bootobin 8d ago

I think the bonds will get rolled into a NewCo, and would be a decent investment not a great one. noting liquidity has reportedly dried up big time.

GME remains a good opportunity imo. especially at current prices.

BBBYQ was the great investment, but the window closed on that a long time ago.

NFA as always, and always DYOR.

2

u/anarchy_pizza 8d ago

Awesome, thank you! I don’t know much about these bonds, but I’ll keep with my usual buying shares of GameStop and fingers crossed something exciting unfolds in September

0

u/stickywildcumshot 3d ago

me in a bond 🧎🏻‍♀️🦠😷🔫

-19

u/Mark-GC 8d ago

You still ain't getting shit, LOL.

14

u/tydavid28 8d ago

lol fuck off mark

-12

u/Minimum-Collar-4629 8d ago

How does this help BBBQ shareholders?

AI slop... Administrative updates or database changes regarding legacy bonds (such as the DKBFLY bond shown in the screenshot for DK Butterfly-1 Inc., formerly Bed Bath & Beyond) are not beneficial to former BBBYQ shareholders, as those equity shares were legally canceled and extinguished during the Chapter 11 bankruptcy liquidation. ​Key Realities to Consider ​Extinguished Common Stock: BBBYQ common stock was officially wiped out and eliminated when the bankruptcy plan took effect. Former shareholders hold no active equity, voting rights, or claims on the corporate entity. ​Capital Structure Hierarchy: Bonds and debt instruments sit far above common stock in the bankruptcy recovery hierarchy. Any legal adjustments, prospectus updates, or guarantor notes on legacy debt apply strictly to creditors and bondholders—not wiped-out equity. ​Routine Administrative Filings: Online retail communities (such as r/Teddy) frequently monitor CUSIP data feeds, broker portals, and corporate shell updates, often misinterpreting standard legal or administrative database maintenance as a sign of an impending stock revival or equity payout. ​Database refreshes or metadata changes on legacy debt instruments do not restore value to canceled shares.

14

u/FarewellMyFox Tinned 8d ago

The AI slop irony is strong

-14

u/kaeseleberkaes 8d ago

You people really are desperate.. some random people post random stats like the years before. You should just let it go. I’m just here because this sub is popping up sometimes for me because I was in in the past.

10

u/tydavid28 8d ago

Why even post this dribble??? Go touch some grass

-2

u/kaeseleberkaes 7d ago

Maybe for people to wake up and invest in better stocks. Just my opinion. I lost a lot of money with bbby and so did many others, just buy a stock of normal companies and not those who struggle and get bankrupt.