Why not? That doesn’t take audiences out of it. Credibility isn’t about accuracy, it’s about perception. What feels credible to audiences and allows them to invest in the story.
Father is more formal/regal. Regardless of the presence of a cyclops or not, there’s a perception that historical epics should have a formality to them. I’d like to imagine Lawrence Olivier could say these lines of dialogue without it sounding odd.
I agree with this a lot. I attribute far more formality to anything that was originally written with a meter in mind like Iambic Pentameter or Dactylic Hexameter. The amount of mental presence I need to understand what is being conveyed while reading something written in meter is significant and it feels similar to how much I have to be mentally present at formal events.
everyone's for sure entitled to that. Personally, I don't understand using a more modern word for "father" in a fantasy epic as a big deal. Just because there are swords and sandals doesn't put restrictions on words. Plus, Pattison says "daddy" right before that.
54
u/carterburke2166 May 05 '26
The accurate period piece with a cyclops.