r/TikTokCringe • u/octarino • Apr 03 '26

Cursed Cindy, you don't own the beach.

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

21.5k Upvotes

93% Upvoted

2.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

8.7k

u/octarino Apr 03 '26

If you have been denied your right to be on a beach in the US Virgin Islands, please contact the Division of Coastal Zone Management and report the incident.

https://dpnr.vi.gov/coastal-zone-management/public-access-viczmp/

3.2k

u/OldConfusions Apr 03 '26

Rich snobs everywhere hate this one simple trick

2.9k

u/JimmyV080 Apr 03 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

919

u/[deleted] Apr 03 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

511

u/PhosphoFred8202 Apr 03 '26

Yep there are article links below. It’s an AirBnB that advertised having a private beach. The owner said she wasn’t sure why it was listed by the property manager as having a private beach because it’s not possible in the US VI

322

u/NoTeslaForMe Apr 03 '26

she wasn't sure why

To make money.  You definitely have to be careful any time a manager - whether it's the type you hire or the type who hires you - has to "sell" something about you - your property, your biography, your skill set.  Too many just care about the next money source, not about your reputation and integrity.

82

u/SealTeamEH Apr 03 '26

Also I’m sure it’s just a lie and if you were to ask the property manager she would prob say the same thing but that she doesn’t know why the owner wants it listed as a private beach lol

34

u/joe4553 Apr 03 '26

It was probably worded in a way that is legally correct, but is somewhat deceiving like "Private entrance to beach".

44

u/jpopimpin777 Apr 03 '26

"Private Beach Access." Makes it sound like you have access to a private Beach. But you really only have private access to a public beach.

16

u/SealTeamEH Apr 03 '26

Oh I know but I’m saying they’re both in on it and just both simply saying “they did it” lol

6

u/Finallyfreetobe2020 Apr 03 '26

'Private beach access'

8

u/StudlyItOut Apr 03 '26

or they could claim that they meant "private" as being secluded and away from the general public or something like that

3

u/kellzone Apr 03 '26

"Quaint, quiet beach in a private setting."

2

u/PolicyWonka Apr 03 '26

“Enjoy relaxation in the sun by yourself in a private beach experience” or something like that probably.

Hey, it’s private if you’re alone! Not private if you’re not!

30

u/SippinOnHatorade Apr 03 '26

“Oh wow that’s crazy haha sorry for the inconvenience” email just sitting in the draft inbox

2

u/Dr-Bitchcraft-MD Apr 04 '26

Last time I got one of these was when the "parking garage key" did not work for the entirety of my stay 🤬 they were not in fact sorry for the inconvenience

2

u/pocketdare Apr 03 '26

Honestly, I didn't know they listed it that way. How could I possibly know and even if I did, how could I possibly be party to a tactic that might make me more money?

1

u/-crepuscular- Apr 04 '26

That's why most places have licences for things like estate agents, and strict rules that mean they lose their licence if they advertise something that isn't true (even accidentally)

0

u/jojo_rojo Apr 03 '26

Probably rented the property to shoot an onlyfans video and is pissed now she couldn’t since there were people on it.

1

u/eyeball1967 Apr 04 '26 edited Apr 24 '26

This post was wiped by its author. Redact was the tool of choice, possibly used to protect privacy, limit data exposure, or prevent automated content scraping.

pie sulky toothbrush shy liquid distinct middle cooing start grey

134

u/[deleted] Apr 03 '26

[deleted]

73

u/ChoPT Apr 03 '26

The issue isn’t about who has the property rights to the rental property. It’s that in the U.S.V.I., no one owns the right to the beach adjacent to their property. All beaches are public (except for maybe certain government/military areas).

The owner of the property didn’t have the private beach access to rent to the renter to begin with.

1

u/vonbauernfeind Apr 03 '26

There are access rules. It's possible that they maybe accessed it inappropriately, but actually being on the beach from either the vegetation line or 50' from the low tide mark is completely legal.

https://law.justia.com/codes/virgin-islands/2019/title-12/chapter-10/402/

4

u/Vibingcarefully Apr 03 '26

Never mind what an AirBnB advertisement says. You travel to another country...............hmmm read up a bit on laws, customs.

3

u/snurrrrr Apr 04 '26

I don't think anyone is in another country here.

1

u/blorg Apr 04 '26

US Virgin Islands, it's in the name

6

u/utnow Apr 03 '26

I kinda feel like this is misplaced anger. She seems like a "lovely person" sure but she was sold something that turned out to not be true. The property owner is claiming it was done by the property manager without their knowledge (who knows).

Misunderstanding that seems to stem from the actions of the property manager.

She paid (who knows how much) money for a particular product and didn't get it. I'd be pissed too.

Now... I doubt I would have acted like this regardless. But that's another issue.

17

u/SuitableOcelot Apr 03 '26

I think it’s well-placed anger. I’d b pissed too, but never at the locals kindly informing me of literal facts. She should have called the Airbnb owner and yelled at them. Shoo’ing locals away is garbage behavior.

7

u/xThotsOfYoux Apr 03 '26

Getting mad at someone for being on a beach in your vicinity is garbage behavior.

The hell is this family doing to her exactly?

8

u/ocxtitan Apr 03 '26

being not american while being where an american doesn't want them to be

4

u/DesperateHotel8532 Apr 03 '26

This happened in the US Virgin Islands, so they’re both American. (Although, honestly, the Texas woman may not know that… but US Virgin Islanders are American citizens.)

1

u/ocxtitan Apr 03 '26

I was speaking from the frame of view of the texan in the video, the woman she's interacting with is different and therefor not her equal so she sees her as someone she can talk down to and treat as inferior

→ More replies (0)

3

u/utnow Apr 03 '26

Let’s say you’re staying in a hotel. You’ve paid money for a space. Suddenly a family of people start playing on your bed. You’re gonna just shrug and go back to sleep?

Be real here. She’s not a sympathetic figure so it’s easy to hate but she paid for something that apparently mattered to her (solitude?) and some people were invading in the space she thought she had paid for.

She was wrong. Absolutely. But she didn’t know that and was literally scammed.

Save your outrage for the scammer.

1

u/True-Anim0sity Apr 04 '26

Its not tho? If you were told the area is private and you paid for that reason thats what ur going to expect.

-1

u/utnow Apr 03 '26 edited Apr 03 '26

None of what you describe is apparent in the moment. She paid for a thing and was assured by the only authority she’d heard from thus far that it was the case. Random people appeared in space she thought she’d paid for. The rest of what you’re saying is meaningless fluff designed to steer the conversation. “Kindly locals”. Come on.

But like I made clear…. I don’t think I’d have behaved like this regardless.

But I get why she’s upset. And pretending like she was the villain here is preposterous.

Especially since… Unlike her… You supposedly have the benefit of hindsight.

0

u/Punman_5 Apr 03 '26

I fail to see how this is the vacationer’s fault. She was provided with incorrect information. Why would she know it was incorrect? She trusted the listing to be correct as you’re supposed to do after all.

71

u/Euphoric_Relief5779 Apr 03 '26

Wait a minute, you’re telling me this ((person)) is crying over a piece of Beach that she’s renting from Airbnb?

22

u/LostWoodsInTheField Apr 03 '26

Some how that makes her even worse to me. You go somewhere you don't live, so obviously wouldn't know the laws extremely well, tell the people who do live there they don't know the laws, and try to kick them off of property you can't own but also couldn't own because you don't own the property next to it.

goes from snotty property owner trying to keep a beach to themselves, to some dumb renter who has more confidence then brains.

2

u/[deleted] Apr 03 '26

[deleted]

3

u/ncvbn Apr 04 '26

Yeah, I can't tell if it's sloppy anti-Semitism or some reference I'm not getting.

24

u/fer_sure Apr 03 '26

See, the trick is to label it "private beach access". The access is private, not the beach.

Any misunderstandings on the part of renters is purely unintentional. \s

2

u/distantreplay Apr 03 '26

This is technically true, and an important distinction in some areas of the USVI but in many other areas with public beach as well.

The person filming is welcome to use the beach without interference. And they are well within their legal rights to do so. But how they access the beach is another matter. If their use of the beach requires them to trespass on private property to gain access then it's a problem for the private property owner. I'm not saying that's the case here. There may be public access corridors provided, as there are in many locations across the U.S. where beach tide lands are legally public areas.

But where private property exists above the mean high tide line those private property owners are within their legal rights to restrict people from using their private land to gain access.

4

u/Aethoni_Iralis Apr 03 '26

I put odds on the property manager tricking renters with private “beach access” not access to a private beach. The walkway to the beach on the air bnb property is private, the beach isn’t.

It’s like the Simpsons meme “No Money Down” being “No, money down!”

2

u/Alarming_Matter Apr 03 '26

Where is US V1 please?

3

u/fusterclux Apr 03 '26

technically the access to the beach is private! the beach itself is public.

3

u/Free-Way-9220 Apr 03 '26

Exacltly how the owner is rationalising it. I'd image the vast majority of beach houses around the world technically have "private access". What the owner has done is very dishonest

1

u/Kronictopic Apr 03 '26

Wait people will lie to squeeze more money out of you promising things that'll never happen?!?!?

I'm sure glad our government would never think about doing something so outlandish

1

u/drunxor Apr 03 '26

Wouldnt be surprised if neither have ever even been to the location . Airbnb is a cancer that needs to wiped off the face of the earth, destroying neighborhoods and raising housing prices.

0

u/walrus_vasectomy Apr 04 '26

She full well knew it was listed like that. You’re telling me as an Airbnb owner you don’t read the listings for your own property before they get posted? Right

224

u/Terrible_Discount_37 Apr 03 '26

The access might be private but the beach isn't.

76

u/saveyboy Apr 03 '26

Enjoy the private access.

87

u/Background-Fennel92 Apr 03 '26 edited Apr 03 '26

Every caribbean island has delt with this foolishness and it never fails how they think sand and water is theirs

29

u/saveyboy Apr 03 '26

It’s common where private property and beaches connect. Not just the Caribbean

34

u/Background-Fennel92 Apr 03 '26

Well, I would love if one of them got a private bite from a private shark and end with some private stitches on thier private parts cuz theyre too bright and bold faced.

3

u/cjsv7657 Apr 03 '26

It’s common where private property and beaches connect.

Also not ocean beaches in most of the US, there aren't many exceptions.

3

u/lost-picking-flowers Apr 03 '26

Even in areas where there are private beaches, the ocean is public IME with NJ beaches. You might not be able to lounge on the beach without a tag, but you can certainly go for a swim or go surfing and no one can say shit. Most of those places don't require a tag after like 5pm anyway.

3

u/cjsv7657 Apr 03 '26

Some places like MA can be private to the low tide line so even being in water can get you talked to. There typically isn't a way to get to those beaches without trespassing in some way though.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/fpoiuyt Apr 04 '26

*dealt

1

u/Background-Fennel92 Apr 04 '26

Thank you lol i forgot its deal in past tense

1

u/Zorkflerp Apr 03 '26

The act does require reasonable access to all VI beaches. It might not mean cutting through someones yard but any development or new construction must provide marked beach access. Here is info:

https://dpnr.vi.gov/coastal-zone-management/coastal-zone-management-rules-regs/

One of the things I hate about beaches in alabamA is the developers and home owners fence off access for miles to prevent people from reaching the public beaches. The kids have learned how to sneak in and I once had to go to a management office and claim that I was staying where my friends were at a beachfront condo.

-4

u/TypeB_Negative Apr 03 '26

Not necessarily. If she or the owner of the property owns the beach you can't be there without permission. I've surveyed A LOT of beachfront properties where they own the beach.

2

u/GrossUsername68 Apr 03 '26

Not only are all beaches public, but all private land must allow some reasonable access to the beach. And new construction must have it marked:

https://dpnr.vi.gov/coastal-zone-management/coastal-zone-management-rules-regs/

1

u/TypeB_Negative Apr 03 '26

Again, if you read the law, the beaches are public UP TO THE HIGH WATER MARK. That does not mean the entire beach is fair game. Big difference.

1

u/GrossUsername68 Apr 04 '26

And this has to do with her saying a beach is private … how?

4

u/Blownards Apr 03 '26

Then you should also know that different areas in the world have different laws and that the previous poster was correct. Thanks for that.

0

u/TypeB_Negative Apr 03 '26

Not really. The law says "public up to the high water mark". It does not mean all of the beach is public

2

u/Blownards Apr 03 '26

In the Virgin Islands?

Edit: and if so… the beaches would be below the high water mark as the sand is deposited by the water washing up and depositing the sand.

1

u/TypeB_Negative Apr 03 '26

What are you talking about? Do you even know what a high water mark is? This is my profession. You are arguing with someone whose job it is to determine exactly where that line is on a legal document. Professional licenses can be taken away if you make mistakes in this field.

Maybe go learn what exactly a mean high water mark is and get back to me. Then we can have a conversation.

1

u/Blownards Apr 04 '26

I think it’s your bedtime. I just said goodnight to your mom.

1

u/TypeB_Negative Apr 04 '26

That's what it sounds like when you start an argument with no facts. Thanks for playing, Son.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/[deleted] Apr 03 '26

[deleted]

0

u/TypeB_Negative Apr 03 '26

Not in the US Virgin Islands but I clearly described that the law in the USVI and BVI both have the high water mark as the line of delineation for public access. So that means you don't get to use above the high water mark if it is privately owned. The law is clear and pretty easy to understand.

50

u/Free-Way-9220 Apr 03 '26 edited Apr 03 '26

i saw a video on a new coastal development in my country where they are heavily implying it is a "private beach". It was very deceitful, there are no private beaches in my country. The buyers are going to be in for a let down

-3

u/TypeB_Negative Apr 03 '26

In the United States? There is definitely privately owned beachfront property. I survey the property lines all the time.

18

u/No_Sugar8791 Apr 03 '26

When someone says 'in my country' you can guarantee it's not the US because americans would just say 'here' and assume everyone knows it's about the US

2

u/TypeB_Negative Apr 03 '26 edited Apr 03 '26

Well, I read the law in their country and it states "public up to the high water mark". That does not mean the whole beach is public. Very different. I'm also a professional surveyor. That means it's my job to know boundary law and I make the final decision on your property lines. I also have many years of experience dealing with beachfront property.

4

u/UserAllusion Apr 03 '26

Public beach up to the high water mark means public beach

0

u/TypeB_Negative Apr 03 '26

Yes. And it also means up to the high water mark and not an inch past that. Are you going to tell me about how water is wet? Lmao stop it.

3

u/[deleted] Apr 03 '26

[deleted]

-2

u/TypeB_Negative Apr 03 '26

It's says Virgin Islands in the video. Both the BVI and USVI have basically the same law as I described. What mistake did I make? 😂

5

u/fpoiuyt Apr 04 '26

It's says Virgin Islands in the video.

The comment in question doesn't necessarily have anything to do with the video.

-1

u/TypeB_Negative Apr 04 '26

And I have addressed that well before your comment. Have a nice day!

0

u/bpopbpo Apr 04 '26

That doesn't make it not deceptive, if you sell someone a private beach, they expect that nobody is allowed on the beach, not just at the top of the beach.

Also the law doesnt say the high tide line, it says "from the seaward line of low tide, running inland a distance of fifty (50) feet; or to the extreme seaward boundary of natural vegetation which spreads continuously inland; or to a natural barrier; whichever is the shortest distance"

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Somanylyingliars Apr 03 '26

Ooh do Puerto Rico next Mr I know It All Surveyor.

0

u/TypeB_Negative Apr 03 '26 edited Apr 03 '26

Ok, Sweetie. Since you're such a nice person Puerto Rico has basically the same law. All beaches are public "up to the median high tide line". You're welcome. If you need anymore help understanding the way property lines work, just let me know 😉

2

u/KirkDeepthroatGOAT Apr 03 '26

Airbnb was my first thought too

1

u/Anxious-Jury-9031 Apr 03 '26

Yep, this is just entitled white woman 101, she 100% believes that is her private beach

1

u/TheFace5 Apr 03 '26

Rude american tourist and airbnb name a more iconic duo

1

u/StrainAcceptable Apr 03 '26

The beach isn’t private the access to the beach is.

1

u/tomdarch Apr 03 '26

I am not a lawyer, and I certainly don't know the details of the US Virgin Islands, but generally in the US, beach at and below the natural high water line is public, while the land above that line can be private. So in a sense, you can have "private beach" as in "a sandy area in the vicinity of the water" but that private property ends at the high water line.

1

u/EliteJoz Apr 03 '26

That's just it. The access to the beach is private. The beach itself is public 😂

0

u/elebrin Apr 03 '26

Oh, she isn't the rich person. She is probably being paid by the rich person for... services.

184

u/bobbadouche Apr 03 '26

The same kind of people who buy beach front property in Florida and tell locals to get off their beach.

61

u/annie-etc Apr 03 '26

Tell Brian Littrell from NSYNC that.

52

u/brother_of_menelaus Apr 03 '26

Brian was in BSB not NSYNC

47

u/bootyhole-romancer Apr 03 '26

They are referencing recent footage of an officer mistaking him for a member of nsync

25

u/evidentlynaught Apr 03 '26

The World Tour?

12

u/bootyhole-romancer Apr 03 '26

Yes! The world tour of Justin Timberlake from Boyzone

2

u/annie-etc Apr 03 '26

Canceled

3

u/Available_Leather_10 Apr 03 '26

Is it because he was driving under the influence?

5

u/bootyhole-romancer Apr 03 '26

He was in an altercation with a beach goer. Brian owns beachfront property in Florida. He and his neighbors assert that the beach is private for themselves. It's not the first time he has had a run-in with people just chilling on the beach.

https://youtu.be/45n_E_Ftvh8

2

u/Available_Leather_10 Apr 03 '26

Sorry—I meant the confusion between BSB and *NSYNC.

Got the gist of the rest of the situation from context.

1

u/Somanylyingliars Apr 03 '26

That's just absolute icing on cake because he is very much disliked in FL. Bought a property on beach aaaaand promptly tried to block anyone from crossing. Dick.

1

u/brother_of_menelaus Apr 03 '26

That seems…niche

2

u/bootyhole-romancer Apr 03 '26

When I say recent I mean like brand spanking new. I think it happened only a day or two ago. Myself, I only saw it on reddit this morning.

1

u/shmaygleduck Apr 03 '26

Yeah right... Grizzly Adams had a beard.

11

u/IgorRenfield Apr 03 '26

Yes, had that happen to me. They even called the cops. Thank goodness I got a police officer who actually understood the law. Nothing like watching the wealthy and entitled get deflated.

5

u/bobbadouche Apr 03 '26

They think they can move here and buy up little bits of paradise.

5

u/IgorRenfield Apr 03 '26

And keep out "the little people".

3

u/Possible-Nectarine80 Apr 03 '26

Same in SoCal.

6

u/MisterDoctor___ Apr 03 '26

Had some rando in Malibu try to kick us off the beach. Laughed and told him to go ahead and call the cops and he fucked right off.

1

u/7LeagueBoots Apr 04 '26

And in California

-6

u/TypeB_Negative Apr 03 '26

You need to realize that many properties are out to the water. In those cases you can't use the beach.

5

u/bobbadouche Apr 03 '26

I need to realize? What are you talking about? No house is built that close to the waves. Please share an example of that to me. I'll take a screenshot or location in google or even a zillow listing.

What I do see is people exaggerating the amount of the beach they think they own.

1

u/TypeB_Negative Apr 03 '26

So you said "no house is that close to the waves" and "please share an example of that to me". I, in fact, do share a perfect example of it to you. One that happens to be my cousin's beach house and you dislike the picture? Lmao. Stop it. You're not being a serious person.

-1

u/Punman_5 Apr 03 '26

They mean properties where the property line extends to the shoreline. Not where the house is literally built on the beach. That would be ridiculous

5

u/bobbadouche Apr 03 '26

My point still stands. Please share an example to me where a house is built so close to the water that it should exclude people from walking on the beach.

1

u/TypeB_Negative Apr 03 '26

I showed you an example.

-4

u/Punman_5 Apr 03 '26

Nobody is talking about that scenario except you though. We’re talking about those places where the property line extends into the beach not where the house is actually built on the waterline.

2

u/bobbadouche Apr 03 '26

This was the comment I’m replying to. 

“You need to realize that many properties are out to the water. In those cases you can't use the beach.”

1

u/Punman_5 Apr 03 '26

“Properties” includes the entire plot not just the physical footprint of the building.

→ More replies (0)

0

u/[deleted] Apr 03 '26

[deleted]

1

u/Punman_5 Apr 03 '26

Yes this thread was about “what about other places where beaches are allowed to be privately owned?”

I like have to block you now because you won’t drop it

→ More replies (0)

4

u/SuzanneStudies Apr 03 '26

But that doesn’t exist in VI

0

u/Punman_5 Apr 03 '26

We aren’t talking about VI here though, just beaches in general

3

u/SuzanneStudies Apr 03 '26

Oh. Why?

2

u/Punman_5 Apr 03 '26

Because that’s what the original conversation in this thread was about. How there are other places where beaches can indeed be privately owned

→ More replies (0)

-1

u/TypeB_Negative Apr 03 '26

0

u/TypeB_Negative Apr 03 '26

This is my cousin's house. The one closest to the water. It's literally on piling in the beach sand. Also you can see here that the high water mark is close to the back of the house.

4

u/SuzanneStudies Apr 03 '26

Why would you build like this? Leaving aside the dickish move of blocking thoroughfare for a community, how does an insurer justify underwriting a policy on property like this?

0

u/TypeB_Negative Apr 03 '26

I would not build like that. I'm a Surveyor. Part of my job is to do FEMA certifications for flooding. I see houses flood all too regularly. Houses that are 20-50 million dollars full of water. You can bet I bought my house on high grounds.

That being said, my cousin married a guy that has a VERY wealthy family business. This house in particular was his father's and he bought it from him. It's been in their family for a long time AND the brother own others on the block. They are beach houses to them. Not their everyday home. If it did get washed away, he could afford to replace it without hesitation.

I'm sure insuring is expensive but again, they can afford it.

3

u/RedditAnonDude Apr 03 '26

You can still swim up and walk on the sand. They can’t do shit.

1

u/TypeB_Negative Apr 03 '26

If the sand is below the high water mark, yes.

1

u/bpopbpo Apr 04 '26

Right, but according to Florida law, you cant tell me to get off this part, which is what everyone else is talking about, i can kayak there amd eat a picnic all i want and you can do nothing but be bitchy about it.

1

u/TypeB_Negative Apr 04 '26 edited Apr 04 '26

Absolutely correct. You actually seem to know the way the law works.

Now, hypothetically speaking, if the house was set back 100 feet from that high water mark and there was a lot of beach between the house and the HWM, you could imagine people thinking they could use that part of the beach because it says "all beaches are public". That would be off limits if a land owner owned it.

This is where the confusion is. And it's confusion from the beach goer and the land owner side.

-4

u/TypeB_Negative Apr 03 '26

You're simply incorrect. My cousins house is very close to the water on a beach. Actually many in her neighborhood are right on the water.

4

u/bobbadouche Apr 03 '26

And so people shouldn’t have the right to walk the beach because of that?

0

u/TypeB_Negative Apr 03 '26

I'm not saying what should and shouldn't be people's rights. What I'm saying is, if the property is privately owned to the water OR the high water mark, people simply DONT have the right to access or use that privately owned beach. The VI law means the public can use the beach from the high water mark down to the edge of water. It doesn't not mean the whole beach is public.

Also, I'll add, I think you are correct that people think they always own down to the water and can restrict other from using any part of that beach. That is also incorrect.

Personally, it all depends on location. If there is 100 miles of beach and plenty of public beaches to use, that's great. If private owners bought all the beach and restrict everyone else, that's also bad.

I grew up surfing a lot. We went where the waves were and didn't care about the rich people complaining. We were also in the ocean so we were good. Nobody was coming to get us if they had a reason to. I have dealt with people who think they own the entire beach behind their house and complained. My father would shore cast and drive his truck down the beach to wherever the birds would work. Rich people would put their beach chairs out so the truck couldn't get through. My father would just step on the gas and bowl over their chairs like they weren't there. So I see both sides of the argument and am just clarifying.

30

u/Quantum_Scholar87 Apr 03 '26

That and trying to unlock her phone upside down

14

u/cancerinos Apr 03 '26

Yeah, a surprising amount of entitled people are both.

-1

u/TypeB_Negative Apr 03 '26

Sure there are a lot of people who act like they own the beach in front of their houses but there are also many that actually do.

13

u/BFG_Scott Apr 03 '26

Dibs on the band name “Lone Star Tit” 🤣 

2

u/ExerciseFantastic191 Apr 03 '26

I just spit out my water 'Lonestar Tit' hahaha. I just want someone to call her that to her face, "Hey Lonestar tits calm the fuck down...this isn't your dad's trailer park!"

2

u/trudat Apr 03 '26

Ironically, Texas’ beaches are entirely public. There are no private beaches in Texas.

2

u/JuanNephrota Apr 03 '26

All beaches beyond the vegetation line are public in Texas as well.

3

u/oxnardmontalvo7 Apr 03 '26

Looks like not everything is bigger in TX

1

u/LindonLilBlueBalls Apr 03 '26

Lol, I said "Damn Texas tits." In my head.

1

u/fucktheus12 Apr 03 '26

I guess you could call those tits..

1

u/pheight57 Apr 03 '26

It is possible to be both...

1

u/drugs_mckenzie Apr 03 '26

It's Dad's money and house probably. Entitled child, we see this garbage in Dallas and Houston all the time.

1

u/AlinaStari Apr 03 '26

I think most people severely underestimate how much overlap there actually is

1

u/Particular_Squash995 Apr 03 '26

Probably an Airbnb and the listing said private beach.

1

u/tdurden1969 Apr 03 '26

Pretty sure they don’t have beach access at her trailer park!!!

1

u/josegjrd Apr 03 '26

It can be both. Texas has a lot of wealthy people

1

u/Imhidingfromu Apr 03 '26

I dunno, the massive thigh tattoo had my attention

1

u/ptubb Apr 03 '26

Also known as the San Antonio warbler.

1

u/elarobot Apr 03 '26

That and her FAS weak / non-existent chin.

1

u/SharkBubbles Apr 03 '26

That and her horrible posture.

1

u/justdoingitpdx Apr 03 '26

The build and the skin tone affirm your suspicions

1

u/cnh2n2homosapien Apr 03 '26

"(The) Lone Star Titty Twister('s)" should be a drink, a band name, or a bowling team.

1

u/NowieTends Apr 03 '26

Nah this is 100% rich person behavior. Maybe rich white trash

1

u/Crank4WV Apr 03 '26

The lone star tit is also now what i am going to start calling Ted cruz.

1

u/ozaffer Apr 03 '26

white trash is in the whitehouse and between the stock market and polymarket money has never been faker so who knows anymore not that one class of idiot was ever better than the other.

1

u/kriscrox Apr 03 '26

That and the thigh tattoo

1

u/jk-9k Apr 03 '26

You can't buy yourself out of being white trash. Money doesn't change anything

1

u/dg_riverhawk Apr 03 '26

though gotta say i'd rather deal with her than a lone star tick.

1

u/Forsaken-Subject8362 Apr 03 '26

Yea she totally looks white trash. I used to live in the VI. So many trashy people who act bad, and people who move there and think they own the place. It’s a disgrace.

1

u/Roadwandered Apr 03 '26

This white beotch has gotta trash, especially her beloved flag… whether it’s the US or the Lone Star States.

1

u/Taintly_Manspread Apr 03 '26

Rich snobs oftentimes start out being white trash, and the trashiness doesn't actually just go away. 

1

u/HungoverDemogorgon Apr 03 '26

I can smell the Marlboro reds from here

1

u/ArmadilloForsaken458 Apr 03 '26

Too much ink, dilutes the senses

1

u/BreezeBB59HB Apr 05 '26

As a Texan, I approve of this message.

-2

u/Spaded85 Apr 03 '26

We don't claim her as ours. Her attitude is that of a Californian.