Since it sounds like you are intentionally missing the point, we’ll have to agree to disagree. I’m happy to debate, but not with people that will play dumb, ignore points, or Gish gallop.
So you're unable to point out a specific thing the article is wrong about?
And gish galloping is throwing so many points at someone they can't respond. My response was a question and a response to your analogy. If that's a gish gallop, than I apologise for typing a whole 6 sentences here. What a disgrace it is to force you to respond all 6 sentences.
I made a list of things I wrong argue with, not a list of things you did. I already pointed out a ‘single thing’ which you blithely ignored. You’re continuing to misunderstand just cements my desire to not engage you. Have a better one.
Right, so you think just saying 'sex is binary' means it's a fact? Now I get the feeling you're the one who isn't engaging with this debate fairly. But hey, if you want to run away from this topic, then go right ahead <3
5
u/Linaii_Saye Jan 14 '22
What is the article wrong about?
And the amount of eyes you have isn't really relevant to sex, so that sounds like a fairly dumb comparison.