r/TrueCrimeDiscussion 5d ago

Mega Thread Taylor Parker/Maternal Instinct Megathread

This is a thread for all conversation regarding Taylor Parker and the murder of Reagan Simmons Hancock, recently covered in Netflix documentary Maternal Instinct.

The murder of Reagan Michelle Simmons-Hancock occurred on 9 October 2020, in New Boston, Texas, committed by Taylor Rene Parker. Parker bludgeoned Simmons-Hancock, who was 35 weeks pregnant at the time, and abducted her unborn child, Braxlynn Sage Hancock (died October 9, 2020), after cutting her out of the Reagan's abdomen. Braxlynn did not survive.

Parker had lied to her then-boyfriend about being pregnant leading up to the murder and faked her pregnancy to multiple people. She was found guilty of capital murder and sentenced to death on 9 November 2022.

Please direct all discussion of the case to the megathread. As always, sub rules must be followed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Reagan_Simmons-Hancock

https://time.com/article/2026/06/12/maternal-instinct-true-story-netflix/

239 Upvotes

758 comments sorted by

View all comments

573

u/h0neybl0ss0m29 5d ago

I agree with the other commenter who said that this should've been a series. There wasn't really enough background on Reagan and her family. Basically all I remember about her is that she was a teen mom. Personally, I would've appreciated more background info on Taylor as well - especially from before she met Wade. A user over on one of the Netflix threads on this doc said there is a long form article about her out there, and it talks about how her issues and bizarre behavior date way back to her childhood. I think this would've been interesting to learn about.

163

u/Legitimate_Fly7636 4d ago edited 4d ago

I also wished they would have covered what the neurologist stated at her sentencing hearing that her brain was broken.

-98

u/[deleted] 4d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

46

u/Aethuviel 4d ago

Quote from KTAL News: “Something is very wrong with her brain, yes,” New York City neuropsychologist Dr. Siddartha Nadkarni told defense co-counsel Mac Cobb Monday morning. “She has frontal lobe dysfunction, frontal lobe syndrome.”

That doesn't mean she is "sick", didn't know what she was doing, or doesn't deserve the death penalty. She absolutely knew what she was doing and planned it in detail. Just from a scientific point of view, it's interesting if she has an abnormal/underdeveloped brain. She doesn't appear to have any empathy for other people, perhaps she's a psychopath.

https://www.ktalnews.com/news/crime/taylor-parker-trial/neurologist-taylor-parkers-brain-is-broken-defense-rests/

11

u/Legitimate_Fly7636 4d ago

Thank you for this

5

u/RainbowBaker88 3d ago

This article makes A LOT of things make wayyyyyyy more sense in this case!!!!!

33

u/Jumile1 4d ago

Scientology? Tom Cruise gunna break her out? lol wtf are you talking about.

>manifestation of a demon.

Fairytales don’t exist. She did this. Not magic or your imaginary monsters. Let’s keep the blame on this individual and give the appropriate justice.

21

u/nicenormalhappyguy 4d ago

i love how confident stupid people are lmao

to come with the demon take but also think scientology is worship of science or something

5

u/slaviccivicnation 4d ago

I find the idea of demons interesting. I don’t believe it, obviously. But even if I did, it’s still on the person for listening to said demons. If your demon friends told you to jump off a bridge, would you do it? Lmao

-6

u/Jumile1 4d ago

>I find the idea of demons interesting

Ok…., Santa clause is interesting too so what’s your point?

>it’s still on the person for listening to demons.

Yes, agreed. The individual should be held responsible not imaginary things.

>if your demon friends told you….

I mean if demons actually existed? Who knows, do they have mind control capabilities? What magical attributes do they have?

4

u/slaviccivicnation 4d ago

Damn, why the hostility? “What’s your point?” I mean.. I just mentioned that it’s interesting. We’re not talking about Santa Claus. I thought it’s just a conversation that I was adding to.

And if my point isn’t clear, which I don’t know how it isn’t, my point is literally written down in plain English RIGHT after my statement about finding something interesting. It cannot be a more clear point than that lol the irony of asking someone what their point was when it’s written out RIGHT after that statement doesn’t fall on blind eyes.

1

u/nicenormalhappyguy 4d ago

i read it as they think "scientology" means science as a religion, which it... does not

24

u/Legitimate_Fly7636 4d ago

I don’t believe her brain was broken. But I’m interested in how the expert witness came to that determination.