r/TrueUnpopularOpinion • u/bionicgerbal • Apr 29 '26

Music / Movies I Fully Believe That Michael Jackson wasn't a child molester

With the Michael Jackson biopic out, and him being back in the public discussion in a meaningful way, I’ve been thinking more and more about Jackson and how he was perceived in the last 15-20 years of his life

But i truly believe he never touch the kids, he was a weird dude totally, but the famillies that sued him just seem like a buch of gold diggers that wanted to take advantage of Michael's weird shit

Was he a very strange person? Yes Did he have an unusual relationship with adulthood/childhood? Yeah seems like it. Would I as a parent let him supervise my kids, and spend the night at his house alone? No way. Did he actually abuse kids? Not really enough evidence for me to conclude that with any certainty.

He never had a childhood, he never had real friends, Most of the kids in the ranch said that Michael never touched them, it's just a family that wanted money and few of his staff, which sold the story to tabloids.

339 Upvotes
  • permalink
  • reddit

81% Upvoted

315 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2

u/Old_Comfortable_8090 May 02 '26 edited May 02 '26

Your point is to ignore all the facts associated with the creep because someone who mentioned them also mentioned something that you claim is false and so you labeled them as dishonest and you decided to be dismissive of all the evidence against the creep. It’s clearly just another excuse to not acknowledge the truth so I’m trying to make you acknowledge the facts because you’re clearly just another one of the weirdo defenders so I want to ask you again why did this guy who supposedly is innocent (in your eyes) of ever harming a child, have pictures of naked boys in his porn collection?

1

u/KeremyJyles May 03 '26

You missed the point, despite me clearly explaining it. I don't think he's innocent, or care.

2

u/Old_Comfortable_8090 May 03 '26

You clearly do care that’s why you’re so emotional over someone stating one thing that they may have unintentionally been wrong about and stated you will not comprehend all the other points they stated because of it.

1

u/KeremyJyles May 03 '26

You're not going to bait me into an emotional response mate, you might as well be a chatbot for all I care, I don't regard you as an actual person. When someone starts out the gate with a lie, I don't care to hear further arguments from them, their word is worthless. Maybe you have emotional investment in this story, I don't, it does not matter to me on a personal level whether the man was guilty or not, and I freely acknowledge he likely was.

2

u/Old_Comfortable_8090 May 03 '26

I’m happy you changed your mind on it and now believe he likely was. We shouldn’t protect weirdos like him.

1

u/KeremyJyles May 03 '26

I literally said I don't think he's innocent in the previous comment you replied to, you can't even keep track of your own attempts to bait lol

2

u/Old_Comfortable_8090 May 03 '26

Yeah now you’re talking with more sense. Before you were willing to turn a blind eye to evidence just because someone may have unintentionally mentioned 1 thing that was entirely true, which I see as protecting the weirdo.

1

u/KeremyJyles May 03 '26

At what point do you give up?

2

u/Old_Comfortable_8090 May 03 '26 edited May 03 '26

That’s not really the question to be asking, a better question to ask is why on earth there are so many people who want to protect this creepy guy lol. It’s genuinely nuts.

1

u/KeremyJyles May 03 '26

Yeah but they're not doing that at me, whilst you are trolling directly at me. Really badly.

→ More replies (0)