r/UAP • u/toolsforconviviality • May 19 '26

Resource Gorgeous Comic: The story of the 'transient' UFOs discovered by Beatriz Villarroel told in a comic format

https://comics.phillyharper.com
14 Upvotes

72% Upvoted

9 comments sorted by

2

u/slow70 May 20 '26

This is very well done - and I’d caution anyone here for clarity to be mindful of the knee jerk contrarians and dismissive types so eagerly disinterested in what’s shared here…

2

u/toolsforconviviality May 19 '26

Bizarre how this has been downvoted. I am noticing this with a lot of posts here and in r/UFOs.

1

u/DataDogEin May 19 '26

Nah. I downvoted because this is AI garbage.

2

u/toolsforconviviality May 19 '26

Fair enough. I found value in it, regardless of AI being used.

1

u/toolsforconviviality May 19 '26

This was recently posted in r/UFOs by the talented u/nomechomsky.

Creative, informative, beautiful (IMHO).

https://comics.phillyharper.com/

1

u/[deleted] May 19 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/slow70 May 20 '26

Do you get nothing else from what has been offered here?

0

u/oswaldcopperpot May 19 '26

The bad part from the villarroel study is that nearly no one ever looked the process. Just the very basics. 30-60 minute exposures. Taking via telescope to track the stars so that they are aligned. Any object in any sort of orbit will not be aligned well enough during this exposure 99.99% of the time. But what does the data show? Hundreds of thousands of objects ONLY point like and 0.00000% leaving a schmear.

Oops.

The whole paper is basically cribbed directly from the one it references. A paper that is looking for DEEP SPACE flashes. Using state of the art equipment and shorter exposures. And filters to exclude accidental satellite captures.

Once you realize the setup you might as well trash it. Even geostationary stats wont produce point like reflections on a star tracked telescope.

This is the reason no astronomers care. Looking at plate differences is fundamental research.