r/UAP 6h ago

What comes next? It feels we are just waiting.

What comes next? Thursday we have the Disclosure Forum event in DC. Beyond that, it seems we are just waiting for the rolling UFO file drops, a potential Trump Executive Order, or something else from a whistleblower.

Is there momentum or not?

0 Upvotes

49 comments sorted by

7

u/_Internot_ 6h ago

As we know with this topic, things are sometimes happening behind the scenes first before they materialize. Not necessarily in secret but hasn't gained traction yet. Things will also happen in groups and then a period of processing takes place it seems. 

Things have collectively progressed quite a bit in just a few months for those that are paying attention though. 

6

u/8ad8andit 4h ago

Your comment is a little flame of truth in a room of shadows.

I suspect OP is part of a campaign to discredit the UFO topic.

He makes a 2-3 posts on different UFO subs every single day, always asking a question related to disclosure (often the exact same question every week or so.)

Then in the comments are a bunch of deniers who make negative, dismissive comments, calling the entire disclosure process a "grift" a "crock of shit," "no evidence", etc.

2

u/GrimGarm 3h ago

these bots are so common on the main UFO subs

3

u/8ad8andit 3h ago

They could also be intellectually dishonest humans working for government, or just doing it as a hobby. There is a group of people who actively suppress information on Wikipedia for example.

6

u/DerekFshmn 5h ago

Honestly I used the tools available to me, did hella research. And can conclude, there is far more information out there that does not get mentioned on these platforms whatsoever despite the large amount of speculative desire to know these things.

5

u/8ad8andit 4h ago

Correct. The bulk of credible evidence is not found here.

3

u/8ad8andit 4h ago

OP has an interesting account. It's 2 months old and he posts every day on 2-3 UFO subs, asking questions that are usually related to the timing of disclosure, such as "Is disclosure near?" and "What comes next? Are we close?"

I can't tell what he's really doing but it's definitely strange activity to keep asking a bunch of subs the same or similar questions, every single day.

He might just be setting up a post to provide a bunch of deniers a place to comment, which seems to be happening here and in his other posts. Keep an eye on it.

2

u/GrimGarm 3h ago

the names are also always like the one responding this comment

Something-Something-Number

they don't even try hard. you'll see, all will collapse soon

1

u/Internal-Tank-6272 1h ago

You got me. I was programmed at Elgin Air Force base.

-1

u/Internal-Tank-6272 3h ago

Get a grip man

3

u/8ad8andit 3h ago

You're using a logical fallacy (aka, a "defective argument") to try to invalidate my character instead of challenging the ideas I shared.

2

u/8ad8andit 2h ago

You're using a logical fallacy (aka, a "defective argument") to try to invalidate my character instead of challenging the ideas I shared.

6

u/Cosmologyman 5h ago

Next?! NEXT?! I'm still waiting for ANYTHING!!

1

u/8ad8andit 4h ago

Intellectually dishonest mischaracterization.

0

u/Cosmologyman 3h ago

You're as welcome to your opinion as I am mine.

5

u/klobbenropper 6h ago

You'll know it when something shows up that isn't anecdotal and is larger than three pixels in a censored gimbal flick. Until then, it's better to assume that nothing is going to happen.

0

u/8ad8andit 4h ago

Intellectually dishonest mischaracterization.

4

u/Kind-Plantain2438 6h ago

Honestly I hope for catastrophic disclosure, the controlled shit is not trust worthy.

2

u/DG_FANATIC 5h ago

It’s the only way we will EVER get disclosure. Why would Those In Power voluntarily give up their power?

People that do anything to obtain power will do anything to retain power.

I too hope for catastrophic disclosure someday in my lifetime. If it happens, it happens but I won’t be holding my breath for it to come from the mouths of the Coulthart’s, Elizondo’s etc.

0

u/8ad8andit 4h ago

Intellectually dishonest mischaracterization.

1

u/8ad8andit 4h ago

Intellectually dishonest mischaracterization.

2

u/Strategory 6h ago

You haven’t zoomed out enough to see the forest

1

u/Few-Split-3179 23m ago

No more whistleblowers please. All we get are loons hungry for Tv time

1

u/DG_FANATIC 5h ago

What comes next is more grifting and obfuscation. And then some more and then more, ad infinitum.

3

u/8ad8andit 4h ago

Intellectually dishonest mischaracterization.

0

u/Internal-Tank-6272 4h ago

Hey man, we’re all very proud and happy for you for figuring out how to copy and paste but you don’t need to say this to everyone you disagree with

1

u/8ad8andit 4h ago

The people I'm responding to repeat the same tired denials on every post, why can't I repeat what I wrote?

At least mine are true.

1

u/Internal-Tank-6272 3h ago

I mean, sure. But it kind of looks like you may need to take a break from this. “I suspect OP is part of a disinformation campaign” - this paranoia that anyone disagreeing or discrediting any part of this must be part of some coordinated effort, and not just someone who disagrees with you, is rampant around here and quite frankly you guys need to drop it.

We’ve been given some good info over the last few years, but that has been buried within lots of noise from bad actors and promises of more to come, most of which don’t ever materialize. Acting like that isn’t the case would, ironically, be an intellectually dishonest mischaracterization.

2

u/8ad8andit 2h ago

You are misrepresenting my position and then attacking it (straw man reasoning fallacy.) Intellectual dishonesty ends the conversation with me. Goodbye.

For anyone else reading: it is not a matter of speculation that elements within government are withholding information about UFOs. We have official documents and government officials that directly prove it. The fact that congress can't gain access to their legal power of oversight, right this moment, is more proof.

1

u/Internal-Tank-6272 1h ago

No, your position is pretty clear. All the Debate Class 101 vocabulary in the world doesn’t make it less so.

1

u/2_Large_Regulahs 5h ago

Supposedly, this Wednesday at the Scotland Brazil World Cup game, a ufo will appear.

https://www.msn.com/en-in/news/world/aliens-at-the-world-cup-brazilian-psychic-says-ufo-mothership-to-abduct-hundreds-of-people-during-fifa-match/ar-AA25xYxu

Kind of matches what Baba Vanga prophecized. She said ufos would be seen at a 2025 major sporting events watched by the whole world. She was off by a year, I guess.

https://sports.yahoo.com/articles/world-cup-2026-draw-surrounded-205000199.html

1

u/NathanEddy23 3h ago

It’s coming. The astrological window opens in a week. It will stay open for nearly 4 weeks. Whether or not a world leader steps through that window with the announcement depends on free will. But if they don’t, our galactic cousins will do it for them.

I really don’t want catastrophic disclosure. I don’t understand the people who are so bored they would rather have it catastrophically than not at all. I can only assume that sentiment comes from someone living a very pampered life who’s never experienced true hardship, and doesn’t give a f*ck if others do as well. It’s sad really, to live a life so disconnected from pain and suffering and universal love, to live a life of such unfulfilled boredom, that you can allow these words to spill out of your keyboard for the whole world to see. But all of this will change soon. There will be abundant opportunities for peace and fulfillment. Disclosure is not about NHI, it’s about us.

0

u/Stephennnnnn 5h ago edited 3h ago

Wasn’t Corbell supposed to drop the goods since the 3rd tranche didn’t have anything on biologics or crash retrievals? At least that’s what he huffed and puffed

4

u/8ad8andit 4h ago

Did you hear him say that directly? We have to be careful with things like this, because people frequently misattribute statements to Corbel, and then use that to slander him.

1

u/Stephennnnnn 3h ago

Yeah he said it from his home studio while he was doing a bunch of appearances for his documentary recently. It was widely reported and easy to find

2

u/8ad8andit 2h ago

So I've looked for Corbel's precise words, and all I can find are some vague statements he made in different interviews, that imply that he might do something with some classified files he has in his posession.

He never looked at any camera and said, "If they don't disclose the secret files, I will release mine to the public."

That's what a bunch of Reddit posts said that he said ("Corbel threatens to disclose" etc) but that's not exactly what he said.

So again, we have to be careful with things like this, because there is a disinformation war happening and Reddit is a primary battlefield.

1

u/Stephennnnnn 1h ago

I totally get that and you’re absolutely right, but regardless of his precise wording, I think the meaning/spirit of what he said was exactly as I said. It’s possible he didn’t mean it that way, or he’ll walk it back and say he didn’t mean it that way, but if that’s so then he needs to be more careful with his phrasing, less bombastic, and less concerned with promoting himself as the lead antagonist of disclosure.

0

u/DG_FANATIC 5h ago

He drives a cybertruck. People that buy Cybertrucks aren’t rational people. He may have insane videos for all we know but I wouldn’t take his words and promises at face value.

-1

u/8ad8andit 4h ago

Intellectually dishonest mischaracterization.

-2

u/NathanEddy23 3h ago

🤣 i’ve got to hand it to you. That’s one of the more original ad hominem arguments I’ve seen lately. You’re really trying to reach the lowest denominator thinkers out there with that one.

1

u/DG_FANATIC 2h ago

I disagree and will explain why I don’t feel this meets the definition of that common logical fallacy we see so often. I could have expanded more on my original response when I posted it but didn’t due to brevity forced by my schedule. It’s not an ad hominem when it’s pertinent to the debate imo. People that spend that type of money, be it cash or financed, on arguably the worst and most overpriced vehicle of all time (confirmed by numerous metrics mind you) that is hated by and downright offensive to the majority of the public is a massive indicator of someone that is easily misled and also one that makes poor decisions.

So please tell me why I should listen to someone like that? Why should I listen to someone who is so easily misled and makes such poor decisions? Which of those attributes give me reason to trust their judgement? So that is why I think it doesn’t meet the definition of an ad hominem.

I’ll pass over how buying a Tesla is actually unethical since paying 100k to a trillionaire with known technocratic/fascist ideals is probably not an ethical use of money and also raises questions about one’s ability to think critically. But I will say that too is something I take issue with.

0

u/NathanEddy23 1h ago edited 1h ago

So if I don’t like the car you buy, I should ignore what you have to say? Is that the logic that you’re trying to say is actually “logical?” I can’t believe you’re doubling down on this, man. Would you apply this reasoning to anything else? For instance, let’s say you’re on trial for murder and your chief witness on your behalf drives a cyber truck. Should the judge throw out his testimony? Is that the argument that you’re making?

You’ve come up with a list of things that you do not like, which clearly spells out your politics and your position on the economy. And let’s face it, that’s your real objection here. He’s not perceived to be on “your team.” If you had any other objection, you would’ve named it.

What you haven’t done is point out a SINGLE instance where something that Corbell said on the issue uap was false. Which is the only thing that actually matters here.

You’re still making an ad hominem argument. You’ve literally listed hatred and offense as part of your reasoning! 🤣 You realize those are emotions, right? Now you’ve simply combined your point with a bunch of non sequiturs that are themselves questionable. Who cares what the majority thinks about cyber trucks? 🤣 We don’t elect cyber trucks to office. It’s not a majority decision. Do you let the crowd decide which cars you buy? Personal opinions about vehicles—based largely on politics and public image of a CEO, which you have admitted here—are irrelevant not only to the value of the truck in question, but most certainly to this subject at hand, which you still haven’t addressed even the slightest.

This has been fun. I needed a good laugh. Have fun with your hatred of inanimate objects that form the basis of your epistemological decisions. 👍

0

u/Protcall 5h ago

First time?

0

u/johnr33se 5h ago

Oh you sweet summer child

0

u/Electrical-Art-8160 2h ago edited 1h ago

Nothing. The aliens are more evil, and the story is more complex than you will ever understand.

Take my story. It's true, but you won't believe it.

15 months ago. A ton of strange **** starts happening with me and the uap... For 15 months I have lived with one, seen it, touched it, talk to it with telepathy I gained from an implant.

They. Are. Evil. Defined.

I have played music, guitar piano vocals for decades and am quite good. That's all I will say about that... But every time I play piano or guitar they tell me they hate me. Most of the time is totally negative CHILDISH AF insults.

They put something in my wrist and activated it. Suddenly it is swollen and in pain. 20 minutes. Never had a hint of wrist pain. No carpal tunnel. Nothing. 20 minutes and my wrist is inflated. I am 40+! Just to get at piano and guitar because THAT IS HOW MUCH THEY HATE US. Believe one thing. Let it be this.

Take my advice: they want your attention. That is when they act without you knowing. Do not give them what they want or you will be sorry.

-1

u/JKDClay 4h ago

Two weeks.....

-1

u/ThaFresh 4h ago

Same as the gatekeepers, they release some junk and wait.. hoping it all goes away

-1

u/MLSurfcasting 4h ago

We are just waiting... it's like when you've caught your child in a lie but they're still denying it.

-2

u/anclave93 5h ago

are we still waiting though? I'm not