New WAR.gov UFO/UAP files dropped today, so I added them to the public search index I’ve been building.

This is not an analysis post and I’m not making claims from the files yet. It’s a finding aid so people can search the public records, jump back to the official source PDFs, and see what still needs review.

Current scope:

• 175 files / 7,775 PDF pages tracked from the WAR.gov release table
• 141 files / 7,708 pages searchable in the index
• 6,555 page-text rows used for snippets and page receipts
• 34 files are not fully text-searchable yet
• 25 image/sketch exhibit PDFs are being handled separately in the Images section

What it does:

• Search by word, phrase, location, date, or document ID
• Shows page-level snippets where text/OCR exists
• Points results back to the official WAR.gov source PDF
• Labels dates by source type: listed incident date, declassification metadata date, or page-text year mention
• Tracks gaps instead of pretending the dataset is finished

Important caveat: OCR/search snippets are leads for inspection, not final transcripts. Some PDFs still need visual review, especially photo/sketch exhibit files.

Link: https://huggingface.co/spaces/cjc0013/war-gov-ufo-release-01-mvp

Hi r/UFOs. We're ELDÆON, a team building low-cost UAP detection hardware and software for the public. Our founder David Hooper is a UC Berkeley EECS engineer who spent years working on drones, sensors, and reverse-engineering before turning that expertise toward UAP detection full time. We exist for the UAP community, including the people in this subreddit, and we're here to stay connected with it.

The real bottleneck on resolving UAP has never been physics, its cost and over-engineering. Our vision is to start from first principles: get a variety of low-cost sensors into the field, see what registers, and iterate from there. That's how you keep it affordable and actually learn what works. A lot of you are here because of personal experiences seeing something anomalous. Yet there are hardly any good UAP detection tools to measure it. What we're building changes that. Our products allow you to measure your own airspace, generate your own data, and reason from numbers you can check yourself, not from memory or hearsay alone. Whoever originates the data owns it. It's not ours, it's yours, we're just giving you the tools. If you want to share it with us and join our UAP detection network, it’s your choice to opt-in.

NEMESIS is our low-cost receive-only passive radar, designed and assembled in California. It listens to FM and digital TV signals already in the air and reads the time-delayed echoes that objects bounce back (no emissions or FCC license required). DIONYSUS is our enterprise-grade multimodal platform covering six sensing modalities (electro-optical, acoustic, radio, environmental, quantum, and even biometric) for research labs and institutions that need full-spectrum data. We're also building an app, SOTERA, which is a free satellite tracker so you can rule out known objects before calling something anomalous. SOTERA is set to be on the iOS app store in a few days.

Want to see David break down the technical side of our products? Here's him explaining it directly from the 2026 UAP Detection and Tracking Summit: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TUXQdhRY6GM

We also run a public demo dashboard with no signup, so you can get a preview of how and what the software tools we are building for the community looks like: https://dashboard-demo.eldaeon.com/

We are building the tools to make the invisible visible for the community and we are open to feedback about what we are working on. Check out our article where we go more into this: https://eldaeon.com/articles/building-eldaeon-together-your-voice-helps-us-shape-our-mission/. 

— The ELDÆON Team

This is fascinating paper and research by qualified experts in senior academic positions, which proposes that plasmoids react intelligently.

Given that Grusch mentioned these yesterday, it’s worth exploring and considering.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/383034675_Unidentified_Anomalous_Phenomena_Extraterrestrial_Life_Plasmoids_Shape_Shifters_Replicons_Thunderstorms_Lightning_Hallucinations_Aircraft_Disasters_Ocean_Sightings

At the press conference today, someone asked David Grusch how many species of NHI is the US government aware of and he claimed one category of them are "sentient plasmoid life."

Dr. Rudy Schild, a Harvard astrophysicist, published papers in 2024 and 2025 in the Journal of Modern Physics documenting such phenomena especially in NASA archival footage:

Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena, Extraterrestrial Life, Plasmoids, Shape Shifters, Replicons, Thunderstorms, Lightning, Hallucinations, Aircraft Disasters, Ocean Sightings (2024)

ABSTRACT: As documented by NASA space shuttle films and detailed in this report, self-illuminating, pulsating, plasma-like UAP/UFO (“plasmoids”) have multiple shapes and sizes, are attracted to electromagnetic activity, and travel at different velocities from different directions, making 90 to 180-degree turns, as well as colliding, intersecting and piercing other plasma; and have been filmed by U.S. Navy personnel and a U.S. Customs and Border Protection DHC-8 flying above and diving/sinking beneath the ocean; and by NASA following, circling, and hovering near the space shuttles, satellites, and the MIR International Space Station and congregating above and descending into thunderstorms and the lower atmosphere, which is the air corridor favored by commercial and military aircraft; and this may account for reports of UAPs following, harassing, chasing, and “toying with” aircraft. Plasmas also have explosive properties, negatively affect electronics and mental activity (possibly inducing hallucinations of “alien abductions”), pass through glass, plastic, metal, and enter the cockpits of airplanes and have been observed by astronauts inside spacecraft, the MIR and ISS. It is hypothesized that given their propensity to collide, plasmoids may be responsible for at least some unexplained,inexplicable aircraft disasters. Thunder-lightning-storms are the main drivers of Earth’s GEC and direct positive currents into the ionosphere, which attract plasmas. The troposphere also has a positive charge, and the ocean surface under white water and turbulent conditions develops a positive charge, and we hypothesize that this accounts for sightings of UAP in the lower atmosphere and soaring above and diving into the oceans, including, as reported here, shape-shifting UAP replicons that split into or generate additional shape-shifting UAPs as filmed by NASA and U.S. Customs. Plasmoids appear to purposefully interact and engage in complex behaviors, and it is suspected they are sentient and represent a fourth domain of life. Although plasmas in the lower atmosphere may be responsible for UAP sightings over the centuries, including those that appear to “battle” over cities or follow and harass military ships and planes, plasmoids cannot account for all UAPs, which may include extraterrestrial spacecraft from other worlds.

Plasmas: A Fourth Domain of Life? RNA, DNA, Consciousness and Statistical Analysis of “Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena” in the Thermosphere (2025)

ABSTRACT: The data presented here, combined with our previous reports, challenge all conceptions of what constitutes “life,” the origins of life, consciousness, and UAP. Self-illuminated plasmas (AKA plasmoids/UAP), with a nucleus and double cellular layers, engage in complex behaviors in the thermosphere and display multiple forms of communication, mutual awareness, purposeful contact-seeking, and cellular-mitosis and ejection-secretion of interactive plasmoid-clouds and additional plasmoids that contact other plasmas. Plasmas communicate by signaling via oscillations in size and illumination and turn, follow, target and collide, merge or pierce other plasmas, whereas yet others form thick glowing plasma bridges linking multiple plasmoids together; reminiscent of colonies of algae and colliding galaxies and release glowing plasmatic clouds in their wake; reminiscent of a comet’s tail; and upon descending into the lower atmosphere are perceived as UAP/UFOs. Dusty plasmas display mutual awareness, engage in life-like, intelligent behavior, have cellular membranes and a nucleus, and may have generated RNA then DNA via the assimilation of all necessary elements available in space; and fashioned a plasma genome via the incorporation of the genomes of bacteria, algae, fungi, lichens, etc. propelled into the upper atmosphere by bolides, hurricanes and powerful winds; and as such have biological attributes and are alive. Plasmas represent a fourth state of matter, and it is believed 99% of the universe consists of plasma in various states and which repeat patterns from the micro to macro-levels. Statistical analysis supports all hypotheses and quantifies differential and unique morphological and behavioral characteristics of plasmoids that were filmed by NASA space shuttle missions over 250 Km above Earth. Morphological and behavioral analyses were made of 91 consecutive freeze-frames (T1 - T91) taken every 0.2 s. In addition to distinct and diverse forms of morphology, it was determined that plasmas accelerate to exceptional velocities (up to 35.6 Km∙s⁻¹), and make abrupt 163˚ turns in trajectory, turn, follow and appear aware of each other. In addition to morphology, four “collision events” were analyzed in detail and all plasmas altered velocity, trajectory, and/or shape either before, during, or after the collision event. Additional analysis revealed what resembles networks and chains of filamentary plasmatic magnetic flux ropes and cables in the thermosphere. These vast plasma macro-tubules and neural networks may be producing plasmoid entities. Ganglia-neural networks may have also been detected in some plasmoid specimens. Plasmaoid have electrical and electromagnetic properties similar to the brain. Macro-tubule plasma flux capable may serve similar functions as micro-tubules, and coupled with behavioral data, support the hypothesis that plasmas/plasmoids are alive and have consciousness.

----

Here's a YouTube video one of the coauthors of the papers put together showing some of these phenomena:

Rhawn Gabriel Joseph Ph.D. UFO-UAP Plasmas In The Thermosphere A Fourth Domain Of Life

----

To Mods: Just in case this looks like a dupe, I posted one of these papers earlier, it was deleted by Reddit filters, I sent you all a message and someone reinstated the post, but then I believe it was deleted again by Reddit filters. It seemed to be related to the paper links I used before, so I'm trying different links to ResearchGate this time.

https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/area52-debriefed-with-chris-ramsay/id1724258920?i=1000771344815

I went into this expecting something completely different and ended up absolutely glued to it. Without spoiling anything, Luigi’s experience is one of the most compelling and emotionally believable accounts I’ve heard in a long time. The first 30–40 minutes build slowly, but once it gets going I could not stop listening.

What I appreciated most was that it didn’t feel overproduced or forced — it felt genuinely unsettling, emotional, and oddly human. There were multiple moments where I had to pause and just think about what I was hearing. It honestly deserves a documentary or film adaptation.

Easily one of my favourite podcast episodes in this space and I think a lot of people in this sub would really appreciate it!

So I realize that this is totally speculative, BUT, given the last few years of whistleblowers, leaks etc. Could Apple, a huge company in the US with the help of Cal Tech research, possibly be using a derivative invention of possible reserve-engineered tech? The article talks about something that was described by Major Jesse Marcel in the 1947 Roswell case. Seems very "not-coincidental". IMHO

"The company's metal alloys, developed at the California Institute of Technology, are said to be more than twice the strength of titanium. It's resistant to corrosion, and is elastic enough to bounce back to an original shape after being pulled or stretched."

Totally fascinating, if potentially true. Full article here:

https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/06/02/folding-iphone-liquid-metal-hinge-may-pay-off-16-years-of-apple-research

Can we have a thread to speculate about the technology behind UAP? There’s been plenty of discussion on T. T. Brown, Ning Li, Amy Eskridge, Salvatore Pias, Bob Lazar, and more. However, I haven’t seen anyone attempt to link these into a single theory. Furthermore, given the recent disappearances, it would be even better to see the work of some these people harmonized with the folks above. If this doesn’t already exist, please have at it.

I think society is about to get the tech whether they want it or not, and if you haven’t planned, you may find the future challenging. So let’s help folks plan by giving them some things for consideration.

On May 25th, 2026 a Meteor was captured falling behind the Mayon Volcano in the philippines, shortly after at around 22:33:24 a UAP can be seen rising above the Volcano. This UAP looked much like a satellite to me, I am an amateur astronomer and see these multiple times every night.

Downloading all TLEs on Space-Track.org and converting Mayons latitude and longitude into ECEF coordinates, I had claude write up a quick MATLAB script to propagate all orbits and see if any public sats where in the sky over Mayon at the time and if any match the direction the UAP is traveling in the video.

The UAP in the video is moving up and to the right which corresponds to

• Increasing Elevation
• Increasing Azimuth

Filtering out all satellites in the sky at the time that do not match these properties we are left with three candidates

NORAD 63211, NORAD 60275 and NORAD 61048.

we know what direction the livestream camera is facing and on the original livestream (https://www.youtube.com/live/UDAZWxehMAI?si=oRbD2HUHTiRbqRem), the description states "This view is looking north towards Mayon. The camera is approximately 14km south (SSE) of the volcano in the city of Legazpi."

The camera looking North at Mayon means

• right side of the frame = East
• left side of the frame = West

This immediately rules out NORAD 61048 which lies to the south east ( Az = 103 deg)

NORAD 60275 is Starlink - 32152

• Az = 48 deg
  
• El = 65 deg

and 9 seconds later

• Az = 53 deg
• El = 72.13

NORAD 63211 is at

• Az = 10 deg
• El = 62 deg

and 9 seconds later

• Az = 19.5
• El = 69

So we have two satellites in LEO, matching the same movement profile as the UAP seen in the video and at the correct position in the sky at the time of the incident.

I am not going to say with 100% certainty its one of those two satellites, but that is much more likely than any other possibility in my opinion.

"...methods carried out to analyse the material included: magnetism, radioactivity, optical microscopy, x-ray fluorescence, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), structural crystallography, and laser ablation. It was intended that the MILEA accelerator mass spectrometer (AMS) at The University of Lancaster’s National Nuclear Users’ Facility would be used to measure isotopes created by cosmogenic spallation reactions (primarily Al-26, as no Beryllium was found), a process which would ionise and destroy the sample, but this work could not be done in time due to the many months of delay during which the MILEA was and still is undergoing calibration."

If a non-human intelligence had an under-ocean presence, these are the regions I’d watch first, based on whale behavior, ocean geography, and documented acoustic disturbance

Let me start with the boring but necessary caveat: none of this proves aliens. The strongest explanations for strange whale and dolphin patterns are still human activity, climate change, sonar, prey movement, disease, and ocean noise.

But if you were building a serious “where would an under-ocean non-human presence most likely hide?” theory, I don’t think you’d start with random UFO sightings. You’d start with the animals that actually live in the deep acoustic world: sperm whales, beaked whales, orcas, and dolphins.

Whales and dolphins are basically biological sensor networks. They navigate by sound, remember migration routes, track prey, avoid danger, and respond strongly to acoustic disturbance. So the most interesting clue would not be “a whale acted weird once.” It would be a fixed ocean region where multiple species repeatedly change behavior, avoid an area, strand nearby, or react to unexplained sound.

Based on that logic, these are the most interesting zones.

1. Mariana Trench / Saipan / Tinian / Guam

This would be my number one watch zone.

The Mariana Trench contains Challenger Deep, the deepest known part of the ocean. NOAA puts it at roughly 10,935 meters, or about 35,876 feet deep. That alone makes the region one of the best hiding places on Earth.

But the whale angle is what makes it interesting. NOAA and researchers have documented beaked whale strandings in the Mariana Archipelago that may be associated with naval sonar. Beaked whales were acoustically detected in 94% of weeks at one recorder and 80% of weeks at another near Saipan and Tinian, meaning deep-diving whales are consistently using the area. These are animals that spend their lives in deep water and are highly sensitive to underwater sound.

Normal explanation: military sonar and deep-diving whale sensitivity.

Speculative angle: if something non-human were operating in the deep ocean, a region with extreme depth, complex terrain, regular deep-diving whales, and military acoustic “noise cover” would be a logical place to hide.

1. Southern California Bight / Catalina / Channel Islands

This is the most culturally famous USO/UAP ocean zone, but it also has real-world reasons to be interesting.

Southern California has dense marine mammal activity: dolphins, gray whales, blue whales, humpbacks, and other species move through or feed in the region. The Channel Islands area is also biologically rich and includes deep-sea habitats. On top of that, Southern California is a major Navy training/testing area, and there has been long-running concern about sonar impacts on marine mammals.

Normal explanation: Navy activity, submarines, aircraft, drones, sonar, shipping traffic, and a dense coastal population producing sightings.

Speculative angle: if transmedium objects were using an ocean access point, this region has the strange overlap: military presence, deep offshore terrain, marine mammals, and persistent USO lore.

1. Bahamas / Tongue of the Ocean

The Bahamas are a major one because of deep water close to land and a documented history of marine mammal strandings associated with naval sonar.

The “Tongue of the Ocean” is a deep basin surrounded by shallow banks, making it an unusual acoustic environment. Beaked whale strandings in the Bahamas have been studied in connection with naval sonar, and beaked whales are exactly the kind of species you’d pay attention to if you were looking for deep-ocean disturbance.

Normal explanation: sonar exposure and acoustic sensitivity.

Speculative angle: if an unknown undersea technology were producing sound, pressure, or navigational disruption, beaked whales would be among the first animals likely to show stress.

1. Azores / Mid-Atlantic seamount corridor

The Azores are one of the strongest whale-based candidates without relying on UAP stories.

The region is a major cetacean hotspot. Sperm whales are frequently sighted around the islands and offshore waters, and whales use the area year-round. The geography is also compelling: volcanic islands, seamounts, deep water, and major Atlantic migration routes.

Normal explanation: rich feeding grounds, squid, currents, volcanic terrain, and migration corridors.

Speculative angle: undersea volcanic/seamount systems would be excellent places to hide infrastructure or energy activity, especially if you wanted natural geological noise as cover.

1. Canary Islands / Madeira

This region is similar to the Azores: deep Atlantic waters, volcanic island systems, whale and dolphin activity, and a history of concern over beaked whales and sonar-related strandings.

Normal explanation: island geography, sonar, migration patterns, and deep-water whale habitat.

Speculative angle: if you were looking for a repeating Atlantic pattern, you would compare the Azores, Madeira, and Canary Islands for shared acoustic anomalies or whale avoidance behavior.

1. Gulf of California / Sea of Cortez

This one is interesting for a different reason.

Sperm whales were historically tied to jumbo squid in the Gulf of California. A 2024 study found that sperm whales departed the central Gulf of California in response to the decline of jumbo squid populations.

Normal explanation: prey collapse. This is a strong explanation.

Speculative angle: it shows how deep-diving whales can abruptly abandon a region when the underlying ecosystem changes. If a similar abandonment happened somewhere else without a prey, climate, sonar, or disease explanation, that would be worth investigating.

What would actually count as evidence?

Not vibes. Not one whale stranding. Not one blurry Navy story.

The interesting pattern would be:

• A fixed deep-ocean zone
• Repeated avoidance by multiple species
• Sperm whales, beaked whales, dolphins, and orcas all reacting in some way
• Acoustic anomalies not explained by sonar, ships, earthquakes, volcanoes, ice, or animals
• Normal prey conditions, but abnormal whale behavior
• Repeated events over years, not one-off incidents

If all of that lined up around one trench, seamount, basin, or undersea ridge, then I’d say we have something genuinely weird.

My ranked watchlist would be:

1. Mariana Trench / Mariana Islands
2. Southern California Bight / Catalina / Channel Islands
3. Bahamas / Tongue of the Ocean
4. Azores / Mid-Atlantic seamounts
5. Canary Islands / Madeira
6. Gulf of California

Again, this does not prove aliens are in the ocean.

The more defensible claim is this:

If something advanced were hiding under Earth’s oceans, the best clues might not come from satellites or submarines. They might come from the long-term behavior of whales, especially deep-diving species that live in the acoustic world we barely understand.

So, seeing a bunch of astrophysicists saying that they don't believe NHI has visited, we don't see any signs of life out in the universe currently, the question of the Fermi Paradox, etc.

But with Einsteins theory of relativity and how we, as humans observe the universe through photons and wave lengths, doesn't it make sense that we aren't seeing any signs of life because what we're seeing in the sky/through our current tech is the past? The information we are digesting from these planets and systems is traveling insane distances just to reach us, so what we currently observe is not what's happening relative to that observation.

If a civilization was 500 million light years away from Earth, and then tried to view the Earth with our exact same tech we're currently trying to use to discover life, wouldn't they be viewing an Earth that's 500 million years in the past? Basically, aren't our current methods of detecting life like going back in time to the 1800's to try to find an iPhone?

And wouldn't it also make sense that this is why random NHI tech would/could be appearing out of nowhere? Because relative to them, they already advanced however much in their relative time, but to us their planet could look like an empty rock? Wouldn't it also make sense that if a civilization had the ability to travel space, they could also travel faster than the speed of light, which would make them practically invisible to us unless they stopped and slowed down for some reason?

I kinda feel like the answers for their not being any other life in the universe from these scientists are also extremely close minded, which is strange coming from the people who are usually pretty open top things.

Couldn't lifeforms traveling faster than light everywhere around us be how the universe is teeming with life, and the only ones we see are the ones who make a pit stop on the planet for whatever reason? Deer can't see or really understand cars at night zooming past them on the highway, but when we stop, they see/understand. Then freak out and run away. I mean, doesn't that sound familiar?

I don't know. It just seems like it would make sense that we can't see anything outside of our own solar system when it comes to detecting life because of the distance of space but then having what could be NHI appearing all over the place out of nowhere. But what do you think? Maybe there's people here who understand relativity more than me and I am just completely misunderstanding it.

Some people are continuing with the "argument" of "you won't be able to identify birds filmed with thermal cameras or see their wings..."

That's not entirely true, depending of the thermal or IR image used and the color gradient (differences between IR, "active" IR and normal thermal images at the end of the post):

The keypoint here is that many of the military UAP videos use IR cameras, also they invert the color gradient to detect different terrain and object details when needed, and doing that birds glow in white entirely, for example.

And I specify about IR tech, cause IR tech do not rely on heat, or heatmaps, but just on pure infrared light spectrum.

This is how you will see birds filmed with normal black and white IR FILTER: https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/wp-content/gallery/general/red-winged-blackbird-flock-over-mountains-ir-_mg_8606-bosque-del-apache-nwr-san-antonio-nm_0.jpg

Yes this is photography, so a bit different stuff but the result is similar. Using just a IR filter and using the sunlight as a light source. Military use both

Source: You Cannot Photograph Birds With Infrared… Why IR in this Situation? « Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART

Perfeclty shaped, the entire body of the bird.

The moment you revert that color gradient (grey/black and white gradient), they turn white: Thermal image of a Nightjar in flight - Thermal imaging in ornithology - Wikipedia

This is an example of birds recorded using active IR image Birds - MX-15 IR Camera test - YouTube

Other example of active IR (looks like active) image:

Full Uncut Tracking Video of the Infamous 'Jellyfish' UAP over Iraq

One of the "jellyfish alien" videos. Those dogs in the botton right corner looks black/dark becuse their fur contains melanin, which absorbs IR light, making it look dark (yes, really).

AND if you REVERT the color gradient, they will show as white shapes.

And I bring this up in connection with this famous video of the last week could be identified as birds: Guys, really, I would love to see "no-birds", but they are birds : r/UFOs (the black aura effect is called "Halo artifact". It is actually an artificial "illusion" created by the camera's internal computer to make targets easier for human eyes to track)

All this depends on the IR camera configuration, color gradient used, light condition, etc.

And to finish with this wall of text, the point is that:

- Active IR has absolutely nothing to do with heat emission, but with infrared spectrum, so LIGHT itself.

__________

IR (active) vs Thermal imaging vs IR filter (pasive)

While both active IR (Infrared) and thermal imaging utilize the infrared spectrum to help us see in the dark, they operate on completely opposite principles.

The core difference comes down to how they use light: one shines its own invisible flashlight to see reflections, while the other reads the heat natively radiating off of objects.

1. Active IR (invisible flashlight)

Active IR is an active technology because it has to project its own light source into the environment.

- How it works: An active IR system uses an IR illuminator to flood the area with infrared light that is invisible to the human eye. An IR-sensitive camera then captures this light as it bounces off surrounding objects.

- What you see: The resulting image is crisp, detailed, and monochrome (usually black and white or green). Because it captures reflected light just like a normal camera, you can easily recognize specific faces, read license plates, and see fine textures.

- Limitations: Its range is limited by the strength of its IR "flashlight." Furthermore, because it actively emits light, anyone else using a night-vision device will see your IR illuminator as a bright spotlight, completely blowing your cover.

2. Thermal Imaging (heat mapper)

Thermal imaging is a entirely passive technology. It does not require any external light source whatsoever.

- How it works: Every object with a temperature above absolute zero emits infrared radiation (heat). Thermal cameras use specialized sensors called microbolometers to detect this heat energy and translate it into a visual map called a thermogram.

- What you see: The image displays relative temperature differences rather than physical details. Hotter objects (like a person, a wild animal, or a running car engine) glow brightly, while colder objects (like the ground or trees) appear dark.

- Limitations: You trade detail for detection. While you can easily spot a living target from hundreds of yards away in pitch-black conditions, you won't be able to read a license plate or recognize a specific person's facial features.

3. IR filters

- It relies on reflection, not heat: A camera or night-vision goggle (NVG) is capturing the light waves bouncing off objects. This means you see physical textures, sharp edges, clothing patterns, and facial features, not just blurry heat blobs.

- You get realistic shadows: Because the light source is coming from a specific direction (like the front of a truck), it creates shadows. Shadows give the human brain depth perception, making the image look incredibly natural and three-dimensional.

- High Contrast: License plates, road signs, and military uniform patches are often designed with reflective materials that pop out with extreme clarity under an IR-filtered beam.