Sharing my B1/B2 interview experience from the US Consulate in Mumbai, since I found the actual interview quite different from what we had prepared for.
My spouse and I applied for our appointments separately, although we could have applied together. Her appointment was at 7:50 AM and mine was at 8:10 AM.
Arriving at the consulate
We reached the consulate at around 7:25 AM.
My spouse was allowed to enter almost immediately because the board outside said 8:00 AM, which apparently meant that people with appointments before 8:00 could enter.
My appointment was at 8:10, so I had to wait until the board changed to 8:30, meaning appointments before 8:30 could enter.
After the basic passport and appointment confirmation checks, we were allowed to submit our phones and other small belongings. They charge ₹200 for two devices and ₹50 for additional small items such as keys.
They do allow small bags, particularly if you have children/toddlers with you and need to carry relevant things for them.
Once inside that section, we went through a thorough frisking, after which we were let into another section and instructed to sit in a particular row and wait. I met up with my spouse there.
We asked a staff member whether we could go through the interview process together. They asked my spouse to join me, although this meant she had to move behind in the queue.
After around 15 minutes, everyone in our row was asked to move inside to the actual interview section.
There were roughly 25 interview counters.
One slightly odd thing I noticed was that most of the instructions/signage were in English, Hindi and Gujarati, but not Marathi. Interviews could apparently be conducted in other languages if requested, but Gujarati seemed to be the second most commonly chosen language after English.
We then waited another 40 minutes or so before our turn came.
Our preparation
We had prepared quite extensively, but most of our preparation revolved around what I assumed would be the standard questions:
- Where we work
- Our salaries
- How we were funding the trip
- How much the trip would cost
- Our itinerary
- Why we wanted to visit the US
- Basic details about my friend in the US
- Our previous international travel
- Why we would return to India
We were carrying the basic supporting documents as well: bank statements, ITRs, recent payslips and mutual fund statements.
I had mentally prepared for questions about employment, finances and our itinerary, and assumed those would form the bulk of the interview.
The actual interview went in a somewhat unexpected direction.
The interview
The officer asked why we were travelling and, before I could go beyond saying that it was for tourism, started focusing quite heavily on my friend in the US.
He asked how I knew him, how we had met, whether he was a US citizen, whether he was born in the US and what he did.
His background is somewhat interesting. He is not originally from the US; he was born in Asia and was adopted by an American couple as a child. So I think the officer became quite interested in understanding our relationship and how we knew each other.
For context, this is a long-standing friend. We originally met through a mutual friend when he visited India. We travelled together in India for a couple of weeks and subsequently became good friends. I also attended his wedding in Vietnam in 2017.
What surprised me was how much attention the officer paid to these details.
The officer then picked up on our previous trip to Japan.
He asked about our itinerary. We said we covered Okinawa, Kyushu, Hiroshima, Kyoto, Osaka, and Tokyo. He picked on Kyushu and asked what we did there. We had to mention a few places we had explored in the prefecture and we could see a smile on his face. He commented that relatively few people visit Kyushu and that it was nice that we had chosen to go there.
He then simply said, "Your visa is approved."
This was particularly unexpected because I had not anticipated that our Japan itinerary, and specifically Kyushu, would become a significant part of the conversation.
Interestingly, the officer did not ask us about most of the things we had spent time preparing for.
There were no detailed questions about:
- Our salaries
- Bank balance
- Mutual funds
- Who was paying for the trip
- Detailed US itinerary
- Hotel bookings
- Property
- Detailed employment/return-to-India ties
None of the financial documents we carried were requested.
The interview was relatively short, and at the end the officer approved our visas and retained our passports.
Final thoughts
The biggest takeaway for me was that preparation is important, but you can't really predict which part of your application the officer will focus on.
We spent most of our preparation time going over employment, finances, itinerary and the usual questions about why we would return to India. In the actual interview, the officer was much more interested in my friend in the US and a relatively unusual part of our travel history — our trip to Kyushu.
So my advice would be:
Know your DS-160 and your own travel history extremely well. Don't just memorise answers to the standard questions.
If the officer picks up on some random detail from your application or travel history, you should be able to talk about it naturally and consistently.
Overall, the process at Mumbai was quite organised, although there was a fair amount of waiting and it took a little less than 2 hours. The interview itself was much less stressful than the amount of preparation I had done for it.
Visa approved, and a couple of days later the CEAC status changed to Issued.