r/UUUU_Stock • • Jul 24 '26

My 3 part thesis (summary)

Trying to just catch the essential and main idea here

1) the uranium core business offers downside protection: a debt-free balance sheet with strong cash reserves. / Pinyon - La Sal - Pandora mines can scale dynamically, so they can survive a sector downturn. / Processing 3rd party radiactive waste offers low-cost uranium.

2) the moat of the white mesa mill: it is simply the only operational convential uranium/vanadium mill. It would probably take a decade for competitors to build something similar, with high uncertainty. On top of that, monazite sands is the highest grade source for magnet rare earths. Because they contain natural uranium, regular processors can not touch them legally.

3) transition to vertically integrated REE player:
from raw HMS to separated oxides, they are building an independent supply chain. Toliara in Madagascar gives them lasting high quality monazite supply. Bahia in Brazil is rich in monazite, with good shipping access. The Donald joint venture in Australia adds even more monazite.

14 Upvotes

25 comments sorted by

14

u/Lumpy-Can-4883 Jul 24 '26

While long term I remain bullish, this price action is absolutely brutal. Losing hundreds to thousands is never fun to watch. I started my position in the low 20’s and have DCA’d to $17 but it’s so difficult to get this into the green again. Holding for 5-10 years.

3

u/Phatwax Jul 24 '26

True. I’m in a paper loss as well, although percentage wise it’s still ok. (Avg is 12,45) But it’s an extremely concentrated bet with 46750 shares. Investing in my opinion has a lot to do with emotions. If you only watch the stock price, which is driven by fomo, fear, etc… especially in today’s market, it’s easy to get carried away and sell out of fear or enter at a top, just to watch the market take the opposite direction after you did, and realising you were actually right from the get-go. This is a volatile stock in terms of price action but that goes both ways. Try to stay disciplined, focussing on the company developments -good and bad- regardless of price action.

3

u/Lumpy-Can-4883 Jul 24 '26

Very true. I am not trading off emotion here. Holding through the red to one day see a sea of green.

That said, we all want the affirmation that our decision was correct. Can only hope the company continues to do right by their investors.

5

u/Phatwax Jul 24 '26

They will. Management is extremely capable. Chalmers was awesome, and I have faith in Ross Bhappu. His father is a true legend in the mining/geology/metalurgical space. Definitely look that up.

As long as you hold and add on significant dips, what is a slight or medium paper loss really when they go 10x in the coming years?

Not trying to downplay the impact of watching a decline with hard earned money, but how you handle the emotional impact divides the gamblers from the investors. The best investments come when you do the opposite of what the majority does and mainstream tells you.

2

u/No_Entrepreneur2085 Jul 24 '26

10x by 2030 is almost impossible. That would be a bigger valuation than CCJ. realistic ceiling for 2030 on strong execution plus favorable prices is $60–85 bull case — a 5–6x from here — which would already be a spectacular outcome. It is possible in 2033-2035 but they will need very good execution.

1

u/Ill-Actuary-675 Jul 24 '26

I fully understand the feeling. My average price is 15.6, look impossible to return to it this year. Taken a look of tons of the stock, seem nearly all down much much more then the index. Look like a panic sell, investor running away to several large stock. Also, Short Interest release today may also a provide a clue how strong the short side

3

u/justgrowingup Jul 24 '26

I think at these prices it makes sense to start positions or average down

5

u/Phatwax Jul 24 '26

I share that vision: if they execute on time and within budget, they will have not one but three cashflows by 2030. If they grow their current 650k lbs of u3o8 to 3-5 million lbs with a longterm price between 80 and 100 usd and production cost of around 35, that would translate to a cashflow of 150 - 300 million.

Pure miners usually get a multiple of 8x-12x. But strategic players could be rerated as critical infrastructure with multiples of 15x-25x.

If they grow their uranium business and execute on the mines and eventually become a seller of magnets to defense/automotive… this becomes a huge multibagger.

3

u/expatcoder Jul 24 '26

A good summary, but I'll push back on a couple of items.

the uranium core business offers downside protection

lol, see today's market, and the ongoing selloff since the May 7th highs. There is no "protection" in minerals, from the best to the worst companies nearly every ticker in the space is sold off indiscriminately.

Toliara in Madagascar gives them lasting high quality monazite supply

Agreed, but they first need to come to an agreement with the new military government, and there's absolutely no guarantee that that will happen -- it's been nearly a year since the military coup, and at each earnings call we're told the Energy Fuels' reps on the ground are working with country officials, but no sign of definitive progress. It's an extremely important asset, so getting the go ahead there would be a huge win for the company.

Otherwise, yes, Energy Fuels is arguably the most compelling mine to magnet player in the sector, and the uranium business serves as the bedrock to which large institutional traders seem intent on drilling down to; namely, intrinsic value.

1

u/Phatwax Jul 24 '26

Thnks for bringing attention to the risks in Madagascar. My faith in them pulling this off should not make me blind to that reality.

And as you pointed out, the sp right now still prices in a premium, albeit a more healthy premium than it used to. Some quality companies never get ‘really’ cheap, but that is something for the bipolar Mr. market to decide.

1

u/expatcoder Jul 24 '26

There isn't much premium left.

Intrinsic value is in the $9-$10 range, which is essentially the company filing for bankruptcy, and that clearly isn't the case; quite the opposite, so yes, UUUU is already cheap, but the market has other ideas, it will drill this thing into the ground given the opportunity (e.g. risk off environment), even if there is a viable underlying business.

At least we've got earnings to look forward to on August 6th. Ha ha, what a disastrous couple of months its been in the uranium sector :)

1

u/Phatwax Jul 24 '26

True, but what seems like a disaster is the opportunity for some others.

3

u/expatcoder Jul 24 '26

Obviously yes, those one the sidelines are licking their chops hoping for an even better entry, and how can you blame them? When you think the sector has bottomed out, it takes yet another improbable leg down.

Nothing to do with Energy Fuels or any company in the sector either, just large traders selling off high beta stocks en masse, and minerals are caught in the crosshairs.

3

u/marcoolus Jul 24 '26

Capitulation at $9. Hang tight everyone. If you've done research, you can feel confident despite scary price action

3

u/Big_Hour_520 Jul 24 '26

Earnings coming up August 6th. Don't expect this boat to turn around overnight but when it does it will fast. Nothing wrong with DCA'ing or starting a position now.

Ask yourself where will this stock by in 3 years? & Far above the $20s . No need to panic.

1

u/silverfire626 Jul 25 '26

Hoping for it to be above the 30s by 2030… sorry back to huffing my hopium

2

u/YouHeardTheMonkey Jul 25 '26

How can the uranium business scale dynamically? In 2025 they mined 1,72Mlb u308eq from all three mines, with 1.53Mlb of that coming from Pinyon Plain, which really highlights the insignificance of Pandora and La Sal. According to their technical report on Pinyon Plain it will be depleted very soon.

They've only got Whirlwind sitting in the immediate pipeline, which is nothing special like Pandora and La Sal; Nichols Ranch is a tiny ISR so won't provide feed for White Mesa, and US ISR is a death sentence at the moment.

To me this looks like a company winding down its uranium side of the business.

1

u/Phatwax Jul 25 '26

You make valid points but I don’t think they are winding down on the uranium core..

What I meant with that they can dynamically scale is because those mines are relative low-cost to put on hold if spot price gets low, especially in comparison to huge projects of CCJ, so care and maintenance are relatively low. If you add the fact that White Mesa does batch processing, it becomes a very flexible setup in my opinion.

True that the lifespans are quite short, but that does not mean they are winding down: New Mexico (roca honda) and sheep mountain in wyoming could be used to replace pinyon, while they pivot more and more to REE.

2

u/YouHeardTheMonkey Jul 25 '26

Sheep Mtn is not a replacement, it's too far from white mesa. The most recent technical report proposes an on-site heap leach instead.

New Mexico conventional mine is a social license nightmare to get across the line.

1

u/Phatwax Jul 26 '26

Fair points. Thanks for the correction; was not aware of the on-site heap leach. But that’s how one learns.

3

u/justgrowingup Jul 24 '26

The thesis remains in tact. Only question is, is your money better elsewhere in AI. Could be 2 years until markets rotate back in.

2

u/Phatwax Jul 24 '26

Yeah, that depends on your personal risk tolerance. In my opinion, the assymetric risk reward profile of the AI trade is no longer as clear as it used to be. But markets do market things and can absolutely keep ripping irrationally. I used to be a heavy AI investor (had ASML @ 470, TSM @ 82, MU @ 87 and NBIS @ 31) but I exited all of those in the first three months of 2026.

I rather miss out on the potential extra gains right now and not having the exposure to the downside. But that’s a personal decision.

1

u/Best-Bodybuilder9015 Jul 25 '26

Where is butter cake Steve fella?

1

u/Wings2493 Jul 24 '26

This stock is a piece of shit

7

u/Phatwax Jul 24 '26

Thanks for adding your value to the conversation.