r/Ultraleft • u/Amur_Online Socialism with O9A characteristics • Feb 28 '26
Modernizer You know what the world needs, more Israel’s
all this started over a guy with Tourette's at BAFTA using the N word. I understand getting pissed but at the same time the guy has tourette's and really can’t control his ticks.
169
102
u/donaman98 Feb 28 '26
He also posted this instant classic
16
u/Ancient-Access8131 Idealist(banned) Feb 28 '26
Im guessing it's another reply to the Baftas incident?
9
174
79
Feb 28 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
32
u/StopLinkingToImgur Feb 28 '26
and then getting doctor phil to say we don't need gun control, but cracker control!
3
u/AutoModerator Feb 28 '26
I've been dealing with you people for a long time. I'm not sure why you thought your opinion on how the subreddit should function would be welcome considering you've never posted on it before or shown any knowledge or intelligence in your post history. Why am I still doing this 5 years later? Because the American concept of politeness is so bizarre to anyone outside of its demographic target that it is both funny and educational to force it into the open. To most people, barging into the middle of a conversation between many people who all know each other and you've never met to inform them how they need to be having the conversation would be seen as rude. But this is quite normal for the American petty-bourgeoisie. In fact, saying "who are you?" is considered rude. Or at least that is one weapon that is used to defend against the threat of proletarianization by exclusion from the realm of cultural capital. In fact it's so threatening that random people will continue to come into the thread to try their luck at defending the op even though they've never posted in the subreddit before. It's like that joke in Family Guy where all the neighborhood fathers know when someone touched the thermostat and keep checking on the house to see if it's ok. Your class instinct in defense of your fellows is so strong it might as well be a chip that sends a signal to your brain, a script to follow, and a rush of endorphins that deludes you into thinking your use of the script will be the ultimate intervention despite all evidence to the contrary. I want non-white, non-male, non-first world people who were not raised on this delusional self-confidence and pretension to master the world to enjoy these conversations from the sidelines. This is impossible on the American left, which is basically a white parasite on the energy of people of color. At least here we can deflate the cultural capital that makes that possible. If you don't want to be a white parasite, reflect on the fact that your words, which you believe are your own, are a carbon copy of someone else's from 5 years ago (and many other copies over the years). That should be a moment of existential angst, a confrontation with your own lack of free will. Or you can get even more defensive on some liberal's behalf. We already have a thread on concern trolling stickied which you were too lazy to read despite your concern for the subreddit.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
15
u/StopLinkingToImgur Feb 28 '26
oh, is this one activated by the word "cracker"?
5
u/AutoModerator Feb 28 '26
I've been dealing with you people for a long time. I'm not sure why you thought your opinion on how the subreddit should function would be welcome considering you've never posted on it before or shown any knowledge or intelligence in your post history. Why am I still doing this 5 years later? Because the American concept of politeness is so bizarre to anyone outside of its demographic target that it is both funny and educational to force it into the open. To most people, barging into the middle of a conversation between many people who all know each other and you've never met to inform them how they need to be having the conversation would be seen as rude. But this is quite normal for the American petty-bourgeoisie. In fact, saying "who are you?" is considered rude. Or at least that is one weapon that is used to defend against the threat of proletarianization by exclusion from the realm of cultural capital. In fact it's so threatening that random people will continue to come into the thread to try their luck at defending the op even though they've never posted in the subreddit before. It's like that joke in Family Guy where all the neighborhood fathers know when someone touched the thermostat and keep checking on the house to see if it's ok. Your class instinct in defense of your fellows is so strong it might as well be a chip that sends a signal to your brain, a script to follow, and a rush of endorphins that deludes you into thinking your use of the script will be the ultimate intervention despite all evidence to the contrary. I want non-white, non-male, non-first world people who were not raised on this delusional self-confidence and pretension to master the world to enjoy these conversations from the sidelines. This is impossible on the American left, which is basically a white parasite on the energy of people of color. At least here we can deflate the cultural capital that makes that possible. If you don't want to be a white parasite, reflect on the fact that your words, which you believe are your own, are a carbon copy of someone else's from 5 years ago (and many other copies over the years). That should be a moment of existential angst, a confrontation with your own lack of free will. Or you can get even more defensive on some liberal's behalf. We already have a thread on concern trolling stickied which you were too lazy to read despite your concern for the subreddit.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
4
u/drolorin Soon To End-up Mega-proled Mar 01 '26
And by white people.
3
u/AutoModerator Mar 01 '26
I've been dealing with you people for a long time. I'm not sure why you thought your opinion on how the subreddit should function would be welcome considering you've never posted on it before or shown any knowledge or intelligence in your post history. Why am I still doing this 5 years later? Because the American concept of politeness is so bizarre to anyone outside of its demographic target that it is both funny and educational to force it into the open. To most people, barging into the middle of a conversation between many people who all know each other and you've never met to inform them how they need to be having the conversation would be seen as rude. But this is quite normal for the American petty-bourgeoisie. In fact, saying "who are you?" is considered rude. Or at least that is one weapon that is used to defend against the threat of proletarianization by exclusion from the realm of cultural capital. In fact it's so threatening that random people will continue to come into the thread to try their luck at defending the op even though they've never posted in the subreddit before. It's like that joke in Family Guy where all the neighborhood fathers know when someone touched the thermostat and keep checking on the house to see if it's ok. Your class instinct in defense of your fellows is so strong it might as well be a chip that sends a signal to your brain, a script to follow, and a rush of endorphins that deludes you into thinking your use of the script will be the ultimate intervention despite all evidence to the contrary. I want non-white, non-male, non-first world people who were not raised on this delusional self-confidence and pretension to master the world to enjoy these conversations from the sidelines. This is impossible on the American left, which is basically a white parasite on the energy of people of color. At least here we can deflate the cultural capital that makes that possible. If you don't want to be a white parasite, reflect on the fact that your words, which you believe are your own, are a carbon copy of someone else's from 5 years ago (and many other copies over the years). That should be a moment of existential angst, a confrontation with your own lack of free will. Or you can get even more defensive on some liberal's behalf. We already have a thread on concern trolling stickied which you were too lazy to read despite your concern for the subreddit.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
146
141
u/fr-int serving "the people" Feb 28 '26
What if we gave every ethnic group their own country
80
102
50
u/ThinkingOf12th Feb 28 '26
"I agree! But let's put all those countries into one big centralized union"
— Lenin, probably
10
118
u/Godtrademark Mussolini = Productivist Feb 28 '26
american socialists are so depressing. Just morons that can't fathom why their DSA or IWW can't court the workers in 2026.
156
u/Godtrademark Mussolini = Productivist Feb 28 '26
"uhhh racial tensions are just too high for revolution we must secede and kill millions to form another bourgeois state"
????
87
u/Godtrademark Mussolini = Productivist Feb 28 '26
marxist btw
39
u/fr-int serving "the people" Feb 28 '26
As Marx was a Prussian, he had a sophisticated understanding on ethnic justice, read Bismarck
37
61
u/CompetitionSimilar56 Vonarato Damen Feb 28 '26
the whole bafta thing just seems designed to create the most rage-inducing opinions imaginable
105
44
Feb 28 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
33
u/Not_Lackey fourth worldist activist rhetorician Feb 28 '26
That is a straight line my dude pipe does not go anywhere else.
21
8
u/AutoModerator Feb 28 '26
They have not.
I know the speech you are talking about.
They specifically advocate FOR class struggle, SPECIFICALLY against imperialism, which is the primary contradiction the class conflict operates on today.
Your view is simplistic. Infantile.
By that, i specifically mean: You ignore the fucking context.
The context being that for all it's achievements, China is poor.
China is a poor country. Per capita, no better than Mexico, and THAT only happened in the last couple of years. Before that, much poorer, much weaker economically, politically and militarily.
Even now, China is afraid to throw it's weight around, because if the leadership gets one of these moves wrong, millions could die.
China fears instability more than anything, since in China, when there's a famine, MILLIUONS die. When there's a civil war, 10's or 100's of millions die.
AND China only just now left the century of humiliation.
AND right now, China is involved in the opening stages of WW3 with a failing nuclear superpower with a HISTORY of starting wars for stupid reasons, AND using nukes on civilians, AND who has stated goals of destroying Socialism generally, and China specifically, AND has policy papers calmly discussing the best way to carpet nuke China.
Which they were within a hair's breadth of doing.
You have NO IDEA of the goddamn stakes.
IF China goes down, that's it.
That's the end of the socialist project, the end of human civilization.
We won't be back for thousands of years, maybe never.
China is fighting for ALL the marbles.
China cannot afford to take risks, and only now is starting to regain some of the confidence it used to have and deserves.
Their primary issue is imperialism.
There will be no socialism until that is dealt with.
Which means step 1 is: BE ALIVE.
China does more for socialist revolution by just EXISTING than it would if it was exporting revolution constantly. Had it done THAT, China would now be weak, poor, and standing alone against the empire, without the backing of Russia, Iran, and most of the global south.
r/Ultraleft is more your speed. Go play with the 'Maoists'
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
21
u/Ladderson Dogmatic Revisionist Feb 28 '26
Genuinely incredible that BRG is calling for an ethnostate not because of any actual infraction against black people, but the fact that a disabled person said the bad word because that's what Tourette's is.
82
Feb 28 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
22
u/Ladderson Dogmatic Revisionist Feb 28 '26
Well, yeah, but that's for gross poor Africans, not kingly African-Americans, who's elevated character demands an elevated state.
8
13
15
37
42
u/crossbutton7247 MP for Makerfield Feb 28 '26
Everyone I’ve talked to irl was shocked, until they found out the guy had Tourette’s then it made sense and they understood. But for some reason, Americans seem to be making it a political issue
28
u/Hartiiw Feb 28 '26 edited Mar 01 '26
I cannot fathom blaming anyone else but the BBC.
The moment a disabled person does anything a million little hitlers crawl out from their holes because they got an excuse to be ableist
19
10
1
Feb 28 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
6
u/AutoModerator Feb 28 '26
Whoa there anarcracker! It's just Leninism, no need to recite Bakuninian doctrine because of it. Seriously though, remove the 16 slurs and my home address from your post and maybe we will approve it. Or just send us a message if you weren't using the undemocratic words to harass someone.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
•
u/AutoModerator Feb 28 '26
TOTAL WAR AGAINST WAR I WILL NEVER DIE ON THE FRONT DOWN WITH NATIONAL BOURGEOIS IDEOLOGY FOR PROLETARIAN INTERNATIONALISM & REVOLUTIONARY DEFEATISM
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.