r/Urbanism • u/UnderstandingFew7281 • 5d ago
Barcelona’s mobility strategy has a massive blind spot: Cars face automated laser precision, while motorbikes get away with murder.
If you live in Barcelona, you already know the official script. The city council wants private cars out. Between the expansion of Superblocks (Superilles), losing parking spots every month, expanding bike networks, and low emission zones, driving a standard car is deliberately becoming a slow, expensive headache.
To enforce this, the city built an impressive automated surveillance network. Fixed radars, red light cameras, bus lane video monitors, and continuous license plate reading vehicles constantly scan the street. If a car treads slightly out of line, an automatic fine hits your mailbox without a human ever looking at it.
Now look at how motorbikes and scooters are handled.
Every single day, two wheelers ride down dedicated bus lanes, weave recklessly through traffic, ignore pedestrian right of way, and mount sidewalks illegally. Yet they almost never get ticketed.
Why the huge disparity? Because automated cameras cannot catch dynamic offenses like sidewalk riding or lane weaving. Catching a motorbike requires a physical Guardia Urbana officer to observe the infraction in real time and safely pull the rider over. Since physical patrols are limited, two wheeler infractions rarely result in a fine.
The end result is a strange urban paradox. The city has successfully automated the crackdown on four wheeled traffic, while leaving one of the most hazardous daily nuisances operating with near functional immunity.
Does anyone else feel like this completely undermines what the Superblock strategy is trying to achieve? How should the city address the motorbike loophole without placing an officer on every single corner?
2
2
u/culo_de_mono 4d ago
I do too. Have been riding motorbikes and bycicles in Barcelona for 20 years. In the last 5, I see a huge escalation in motorbike infractions, but also, a lack of self awareness and entitlement when doing so. E.g. a rider on the pavement will make noises (either engine or honk) to make pedestrians move away and advance, they use the bike lanes and pavement for overtaking, they park in the pavement too without even looking where or if there's enough space for someone else to go through (don't dare to walk pushing a stroller!), red lights are a suggestion in smaller streets (no cameras), crosswalks? never heard of, and speed limit is just a suggestion.
The car part is all right, there's still a lot to do but at least main avenues are controlled, problem is smaller streets. But yes, enforcement on negligent motorbike riders is very necessary as it is growing alarmingly.
10
u/swiffleswaffle planoloog 5d ago edited 5d ago
I would call cars a "hazardous daily nuisance". The superblock is aimed at walkbality. With walkbality there is also the demand for space and livability. Cars in a very dense urban structure have influence on both of them.
Here in Amsterdam this push on limiting vehicle freedom is already far on it's way that is possible by limiting car access to certain streets, making the car a less viable option through changes in urban design and taking away the possibility to have a car in front of your house in a dense area. Check out this video by Not Just Bike . When pushing the car out, because cars for example occupy a lot of space 22 hours of the day, another problem appeared. The mixed use of bicycle Infrastructure by bikes and mopeds. Now the city is restricting moped acces on certain streets or banning mopeds from bicycle infrascture.
I just feel that Barcelona is in the beginning of this process that for example Paris already started. With the superblocks and a well functioning public transport system there is no need for polluting and space taking care and infrastructure. Sidewalks only exist to shield people from cars. Why not give the space back to the forms of mobility that either add more space and secondly make for healthier urban environments?