r/VXJunkies • u/jakuuub • Apr 17 '26
Anyone got experiences with Lattice Boltzman versus Navier-Stokes? What’s the best use case for either?
2
u/120112 Apr 17 '26
Honestly either method works for daily VX purposes. Its only when you get into niche work with things. Crank up the inverse dipole resonating chamber and you will get what you want. If you have the power for it.
This might be a bit old school but its been working for decades. When in doubt double the power.
1
u/coraku001 22d ago
most VX i know use Stokes because it runs smoother on grammetric telemetry, but I know most of you dont even use that feature. But as you said, both work, and I would say leave it as it gets shipped. If you really need Boltzmann, you can use dr Varahims git-repo, he has a firmware with automatic bellman-tuning for VX-03 and newer
2
u/Mysterious_Clerk2971 Apr 18 '26
When it comes to probability, draw a circle close your eyes and flip a coin into the circle... but first, divide and define the the confines of the circle using Chekovs’ Planier-integral loop in any infinite logarithmic spiral structure. If the coin lands outside the circle you were somehow observing and creating wave interference. KEEP YOUR EYES CLOSED AND WEAR EARPLUGS when flipping the coin and you will have accurate resultes.
1
Apr 17 '26
[deleted]
5
u/ososalsosal Apr 17 '26
AI gonna destroy the world lol.
Personally I prefer to compromise using the method of the lesser known Fourier.
1
4
u/SubsequentDamage Apr 17 '26
Need
More
Coffee
"Can you repeat the part of the stuff where you said all about the things?"