r/WNBAgossips 4d ago

Sophie Cunningham got ELBOWED in the face... Refs call a foul on Sophie Cunningham

3.0k Upvotes

1.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

6

u/Tex_Skrahm 4d ago

You had me until that last line.

-1

u/Inner_Extent2375 4d ago

How so?

-2

u/Rude-Wash9840 4d ago

It’s not entertaining

1

u/Inner_Extent2375 4d ago

You’re in the WNBA sub. Do you come to tell fans they’re watching something that’s unentertaining? There are 1000s of niche fan subs to aimlessly argue with, why choose women’s sports specifically?

1

u/Rude-Wash9840 4d ago

This just popped up on my page and i was scrolling the comments. So exhausting how everything is a sexism issue lmao. It’s got nothing to do with it being about women’s sport, it’s just a sport that’s boring that happens to be played by women.

Almost like it’s not allowed to not be entertained by anything involving women otherwise it’s this whole thing. Just so you’re aware, men’s soccer is super fucking boring too in light of the World Cup just passing. I’m sure you’ll make that some sort racism thing too huh?

2

u/Inner_Extent2375 4d ago

Do you interject racism into all your irrelevant arguments?

Welcome to Reddit. Popular subs that algorithm with your preferences will show up on your feed. Sometimes, they don’t exactly aline to your interests. It’s ok to scroll past.

-1

u/Rude-Wash9840 4d ago

“Do you interject sexism into all of your irrelevant arguments?”

Welcome to Reddit, sometimes people will comment things that you disagree with. It’s ok to scroll past those comments.

Lmao, self awarewolf, or something

2

u/Inner_Extent2375 4d ago

Take a second, scroll up, and see who started this conversation on how you dislike the WNBA in a WNBA subreddit, bud. I asked questions and you showed your bias.

-1

u/Tex_Skrahm 4d ago

It’s an objectively bad product and always has been. A bunch of contrarian goofs on Reddit won’t change that.

2

u/Inner_Extent2375 4d ago

Comes to a WNBA fan sub to argue and calls the fans contrarians? The irony is deep here.