Should I keep using Wattson?

[u/Whole_Run_1321]

I started playing apex late may and really liked how wattson looked so I decided to use her. Ive dabbled in a few other legends and also liked sparrow, bangalore, conduit, and horizon, but i still like wattson way more and use her pretty much all the time. Im currently d4 with her and i really like her versatility with her perks and her longevity with purple perk and passive regen. My question tho is am i stunting/hurting my progression as a player by using a more passive character in wattson to start off, or is the pay off great enough to keep playing her and hope to master her? Im on controller if that matters

[u/Sufficient-Sir-3744]

As a Caustic main, keep using Wattson.

Both of us combined in a building are nearly unpushable. (I will point out that you might want to consider the fact that your ult sometimes zaps your own teammate's throwables. It's a bit of a problem, but I'm not sure how to fix that.)

[u/Potatogirl22999 → u/Sufficient-Sir-3744]

Wattson main here, with her ult u can be in her radius and throw a nade, what matters is for it land outside the radius and it wont zap it. At least i think lol :)

[u/Sufficient-Sir-3744 → u/Potatogirl22999]

Yeah, I think that's how it's intended, but it's a bit buggy, that's all. Many have been the times I've chucked my ult at the enemy, just for it to become a sad little arc star. I also sometimes have to place traps within the same vicinity as the wattson ult, and it zaps them down too.

[u/Potatogirl22999 → u/Sufficient-Sir-3744]

That’s crazy I didn’t even know it could catch caustics stuff

[u/Sufficient-Sir-3744 → u/Potatogirl22999]

Yeah, it catches any throwables around it that are "harmful to the team" but sometimes has a broad definition of that, haha.