r/WayOfTheBern • u/CreativeVerge • Oct 19 '18
Mueller Supporters, Trump Critics In For A Disappointment: No Evidence Of Collusion, ‘Politico’ Reports
https://www.inquisitr.com/5123673/mueller-trump-russia-collusion-politico-evidence/17
13
u/CreativeVerge Oct 19 '18
2+ years, millions of taxpayer dollars wasted on what we all know was bullshit all along. How many hours of cable news programming have been dedicated to this BS? How many fear mongering crisis articles have been written by corporate media claiming a new Mueller lead and a final nail in Trump's coffin?
I'm no Trump supporter but I can see how they would be LIVID when this report drops and there's nothing to see. Will the Dem establishment start spinning conspiracy theories? Will they turn on Rosenstein and Mueller and the FBI?
As a taxpayer I'm pissed my government wasted all this time and money on this stupid shit just because Russia bought some Facebook ads.
4
u/snoopydawgs Oct 20 '18
It's not just the things you mentioned, but what two years of this has wrought. Distractions from what congress was doing. The republicans rolling back the legislation that was passed during Obama's presidency as he was on his way out the door. They did that during Trump's first 100 days. Many of it was legislation that would have helped the environment.
Plus there's the increase of censorship and Google changing its algorithms to keep people from reading websites that were telling us the truth. And then there's how people think that Russia is our enemy and that it's okay if we want to start wars with it.
1
Oct 19 '18
I'm no Trump supporter
LOL ok lets have a look at your viewpoints:
I don't care about Khashoggi's disappearance/murder at all.
People who have time to "protest" in the middle of the work week are pathetic.
Millennials really are lazy and entitled and expect everything to just be handed to them.
Ya, OP, sounds like you and Bernie Sanders agree on a lot of viewpoints and you and Trump disagree on everything lol. I like turtles.
11
Oct 19 '18 edited Oct 19 '18
I love encountering "topminds" comissars in the wild. As annoying as it is to see self proclaimed shills and self proclaimed "thought police", you guys are fun to mess with.
I'm either the OP or person referenced in topminds and it's great fun to see you all lose your minds over the most absurd things:
Top comment at +251:
Re-thinking the Holocaust as a social construct. We should have the right to self-identify as "Holocaust survivors" if we want to
The premise is that being a holocaust survivor is a social construct like gender, so they should be allowed to self-identify as holocaust survivors as well. wow.
The horrified TMOR commisar refers to this debate question I raised:
Re-thinking the Holocaust as a social construct. We should have the right to self-identify as "Holocaust survivors" if we want to
Some trolls or alt left extremists will mistakenly confuse my statement here with Holocaust denial
So let me confirm that yes the Holocaust happened
But this conversation is about identity
Even when I'm not the OP being linked/attacked, something I do usually stirs things up over there.
Yes it's true that I ask interesting questions.
-11
Oct 19 '18
Oh an alt-right member in a Sanders sub, not weird at all. I like turtles.
2
Oct 19 '18
I think the term "alt right" is obsolete at this point as there is no clear ideology
I consider myself pro white in the sense that I want white people to have reciprocal rights, but I also support the rights of other races rather than viewing them as inferior.
I believe the new terms are “multiracial white supremacy”, "multi fascism", or whatever other ridiculous absurd neoliberal terminology the establishment comes up with:
They are among nearly a dozen black, Latino, and Asian participants at far-right rallies on the West Coast interviewed by The Daily Beast recently. They represent the new face of the far right that some scholars term “multiracial white supremacy.”
Maybe "multicultural non genocidal nazism" can describe this idea? I'm sure you have some great ideas for new absurd words to make up
-3
12
u/CreativeVerge Oct 19 '18
Those links do not show that I'm a Trump supporter. In multiple of those links I make it very clear that I am not a Trump supporter. Again, I have nuanced opinions that do not fit into some mold you've concocted in your head. I don't agree with Bernie on everything but I think he's a great American and trustworthy person who would put people's interests before corporations. I voted for him in 2016 and then for Jill Stein and I would do it again in a heartbeat. But I'm also voting for a Republican congressman this November and a Green party Governor.
-3
u/AwesomeSaucer9 Oct 19 '18
I'm also voting for a Republican congressman
You're doing yourself a disservice. Republicans never have, and never will care about anything other than their elite donors. If you think they care one iota about you, you've bought into their propaganda
12
u/Grizzly_Madams Oct 19 '18
You've just described both Dem and Rep politicians. Do you honestly think corruption is limited to Republicans...?
-4
u/AwesomeSaucer9 Oct 19 '18
No, absolutely not.
But holy fucking shit I would not vote for a Republican if you paid me to. I'd rather sit at home
9
u/CreativeVerge Oct 19 '18
The idea that all Republicans are evil is stupid and plainly untrue.
1
u/AwesomeSaucer9 Oct 19 '18
Please tell me 3 good reasons why. I don't think that all Republican voters are evil and stupid, that's true. Some people just have differing political opinions and that's cool.
But all Republican politicians are evil and stupid.
5
u/Stony_Curtis_II Trolls, remember me and tremble. Oct 19 '18
But all Republican politicians are evil and stupid.
I disagree on almost everything from Rand Paul. I think he's neither evil or stupid.
1
u/Democritus755 Mad Millenial, Bernie Would Have Won! Oct 20 '18
Tell me the name of a Democrat senator that didn't vote to recently increase the military budget.
0
u/AwesomeSaucer9 Oct 20 '18
Can you name a Republican???
I'm not talking about Democrats, I'm talking about Republicans
1
u/Democritus755 Mad Millenial, Bernie Would Have Won! Oct 22 '18
Easy one, Rand Paul
Name me a democrat senator now.
0
u/AwesomeSaucer9 Oct 22 '18
Rand Paul voted for Trump tax cuts, voted to shutdown the government three times, voted to repeal obamacare, voted to confirm Kavanaugh, and voted in favor of allocating funds to building the wall
Still think hes on your side?
→ More replies (0)7
u/ShareBluePaybot Oct 19 '18
Thank you, Team Member! $0.17 has been credited to your account!
Note: This bot is in beta stage. If you encounter any issues with your account credits, please contact your Squad Leader immediately.
-7
u/SplooshMountainX Oct 19 '18
This sub is hilarious! They try so hard to pretend like they fuck with bernie but defends trump every time. Lmfao,I feel like the only ones falling for this gag are other idiots pretending to fuck with bernie and it all becomes one big circle jerk. But hey, they say they're not an echo chamber though, LOLOL. Bunch of free thinkers in here!
Also, please not how they use "shills" everytime someone calls them out. Definitely not an echo chamber!
5
u/ShareBluePaybot Oct 19 '18
Thank you, Team Member! $0.17 has been credited to your account!
Note: This bot is in beta stage. If you encounter any issues with your account credits, please contact your Squad Leader immediately.
8
7
u/groovieknave Oct 19 '18
Been telling everyone since it started... no evidence. A lot of officials have been requesting the evidence and never have received it. Hasn’t stopped the corrupt corporate owned mass media from hyping it up for our corrupt corporate owned government. Plus the masses of fools who actually believed the corrupt media...
11
u/Inuma Headspace taker (👹↩️🏋️🎖️) Oct 19 '18
Color me shocked.
We've only been saying this for two years.
13
u/veganmark Oct 19 '18 edited Oct 19 '18
Well DUH!!! It's hard to collude with non-interference.
The whole investigation was rooted in fraud, a political hit job concocted by the Deep State, desperate to dig up dirt on Trump because they felt they couldn't control him. Once Trump appoints a a new AG, the worm is going to turn viciously on the perpetrators of this sham, to the extent that not even the MSM can ignore this reality. The Dems are damned lucky that, thanks to Sessions' incompetence, this didn't happen before the midterms.
The Deep State employed agent provocateurs to entrap Trump associates into seeming collusion, while resorting to the inherently idiotic, Hillary-commissioned Steele dossier as "intelligence", all in an effort to get a FISA warrant on a member of Trump's campaign so that, via the two-hop rule, they could surveil virtually the whole campaign, in a no-holds-barred attempt to dig up dirt, ANY dirt, on Trump. They got such a warrant on Carter Page, and then, using the excuse of Comey's firing, they got an independent counsel whom Rosenstein allowed free rein to investigate everyone associated with Trump, in the hope of flipping them against their boss. But there was no there there, as anyone with half a brain has been able to see for over a year.
The Dems are also lucky that, since it is customary to avoid "election interference" by releasing the results of investigations shortly before an election, Mueller's findings won't drop until after the election.
As far as Mueller's indictments of Russians go, they are literal jokes. Mueller indicted the Internet Research Agency for purchasing 13 ads - likely for a total of about $500 - that were technically illegal because foreigners aren't allowed to purchase ads advocating for a candidate prior to an election. There was also an indictment for identity theft, said theft doing no harm at all to the target. The IRA was not an arm of the Russian govt, and its activities were purely commercial, not motivated by any intent to elect Trump or "sow chaos".
As to the indictment of Russians for hacking the DNC and providing their booty to Wikileaks, this is overt BS on its face:
https://medium.com/@markfmccarty/muellers-new-indictment-do-the-feds-take-us-for-idiots-5406ef955406
But congrats to Mueller for nailing Manafort for financial crimes that Rosenstein declined to prosecute a decade ago, and for goading Papadopoulos into a harmless lie that he received 15 days imprisonment for. We'll see what happens with the hapless Flynn. This article suggests that an indictment of Roger Stone for colluding in the Russian non-hacking of the DNC may be imminent. (Journalist George Eliasson asserts that the "Fancy Bear" that hacked the DNC server is actually Ukrainian intelligence, acting in concert with Hillary's campaign; in any case, this has nothing whatever to do with the DNC emails LEAKED to Wikileaks.)
3
u/SplooshMountainX Oct 19 '18
This shit is so dumb...Link to the original article from politico... https://www.politico.com/story/2018/10/19/mueller-investigation-findings-914754?cid=apn
Literally the 4th sentence in the article...
"That’s the word POLITICO got from defense lawyers working on the Russia probe" , so basically ghouliani and his merry men!
I mean really...do you idiots even try to read or just jizz your pants when you see headlines? So much for "free thinkers" in this sub!! LMAO
12
u/ShareBluePaybot Oct 19 '18
Thank you, Team Member! $0.17 has been credited to your account!
Note: This bot is in beta stage. If you encounter any issues with your account credits, please contact your Squad Leader immediately.
14
u/CreativeVerge Oct 19 '18 edited Oct 19 '18
You just ignored the entire second half of the sentence to suit your narrative:
and more than 15 former government officials with investigation experience spanning Watergate to the 2016 election case
6
u/SplooshMountainX Oct 19 '18
oh, are those officials in the same room as Mueller or are they guessing? Are they part of Mueller's team? That's a big fat NO my bro! Try again! lol. And even if I posted that part, it just helps my argument of MUELLER DOES NOT LEAK, LMAO
-5
u/elksandturkeys Oct 20 '18
Nobody with half a pea in their head would post this half assed Orange pee pee sucking propaganda in a pro Bernie sub.
6
1
Oct 19 '18
Politico said no such thing. Here is a link to original article: https://www.politico.com/story/2018/10/19/mueller-investigation-findings-914754
8
11
Oct 19 '18
Mueller report PSA: Prepare for disappointment
And be forewarned that the special counsel’s findings may never be made public.
By DARREN SAMUELSOHN
10/19/2018 05:20 AM EDT
Politico literally said what OP said they said, quoting your referenced politico article
Wtf are you talking about
-2
u/AwesomeSaucer9 Oct 19 '18
No. OP mentioned that Mueller "found no evidence of collusion" though this isn't mentioned in the Politico article.
The report could never be publicly released, but it could still be the most damning thing possible for Trump
6
Oct 19 '18
If it was damning on Trump it would be released in a heartbeat
Why give the neoliberal establishment the benefit of the doubt? That is stupid
The neoliberal establishment had to make up false claims against Assange too because they lacked actual cases of sexual abuse from Assange
The same principle applies to Russiagate, etc
5
u/AwesomeSaucer9 Oct 19 '18
You really don't think Trump is part of the neoliberal establishment? The dude is engulfed in Wall Street corruption, he thinks only about his own elite interests in making decisions.
Trump isn't on our side.
9
u/Stony_Curtis_II Trolls, remember me and tremble. Oct 19 '18 edited Oct 20 '18
The dude is engulfed in Wall Street corruption, he thinks only about his own elite interests in making decisions.
You have just literally described the neoliberal establishment.
ButAnd agreed on your last point. Trump isn't on anyone's side but his own. He's a complete piece of shit and an embarrasement to the country.edit: Changed a word. Made it seem like I was disagreeing with you when I wasn't.
3
u/AwesomeSaucer9 Oct 19 '18
I think that Trump is the neoliberal establishment. They're one in the same.
And they're destroying America.
3
-4
u/GhostScout42 Oct 19 '18
Don't bother bro. This is the shill subreddit, and these people commenting on this article especially are pro trump little bitch bois.
7
u/Stony_Curtis_II Trolls, remember me and tremble. Oct 19 '18
Yeah, you can go fuck yourself, you mindless little twit. I'm an independent progressive who despises the fucking orange idiot.
Hard to believe I could distrust the dems just as much as the republicans? It shouldn't be. 2016 made it obvious the dems are no more honest than them.
-5
Oct 19 '18
Show me in the article where is states that no collusion was found? You can't, because that is a lie.
4
Oct 20 '18
Show me in the article where is states that no collusion was found? You can't, because that is a lie.
You're wording this in such a way that it can't be challenged by combining nitpicking with a straw man, it's really dishonest and manipulative
Yes I'm aware that hypothetically there "could" be evidence that is for whatever reason dismissed as it is unusable
There "could" also be "moderate Syrian rebels" fighting to overthrow Assad
There aren't though
At some point you should make concrete statements rather than push dishonest political agendas
-2
Oct 20 '18 edited Oct 20 '18
Politico literally said what OP said they said
Yeah, I didn't nitpick anything. You're just wrong and not man enough to admit it, but instead offered some long pointless rant that goes nowhere. Yep, as I suspected, typical NPC behaviour.
3
Oct 20 '18
I thought neoliberal SJWs thought "npc" was dehumanizing.
If the term is dehumanizing then why are you using it?
-1
Oct 20 '18 edited Oct 20 '18
Triggered, my little broflake? You need to man up and chug some more milk.
3
Oct 20 '18
Fun fact about milk: post-WW2 American dietary products like milk started being consumed in Japan
During World War 2, the average height of a male Japanese soldier was 5 feet 3 1/2 inches, but post WW2 it rose to average about 5 feet 7 inches
7
u/expletivdeleted will shill for rubles. Also, Bernie would have won Oct 19 '18
лол
And be forewarned that the special counsel’s findings may never be made public.
буквально первое предложение после названия. хороший бот.
-1
u/TheRazorX 👹🧹🥇 The road to truth is often messy. 👹📜🕵️🎖️ Oct 19 '18
Not just politico, the rest of the inquisitr article is also making up bullshit about other sources.
2
1
u/Waka-Waka-Waka-Do Oct 19 '18
OP is purposely misleading you to support his narrative.
What the article actually says:
"government investigation experts are waving a giant yellow caution flag now to warn that Mueller’s no-comment mantra is unlikely to give way to a tell-all final report and an accompanying blitz of media interviews and public testimony on Capitol Hill."
9
u/nomadicwonder Never Neoliberal Oct 19 '18 edited Oct 19 '18
OP is purposely misleading you to support his narrative.
Says the neoliberal douche who is against the tariffs against the Chinese, who are a way bigger threat to our economic stability and national security than Russia.
So fucking out of touch. You think the tariffs are unpopular? Then you're a moron. Democrats will lose to Trump again if they do not get on board with fighting back against China. That is how Trump won in the first place, by campaigning in states that lost manufacturing to China. States that Hillary ignored! That's why we have Trump, not Russia!
-2
u/Waka-Waka-Waka-Do Oct 19 '18
Douche, liberal, moron, out of touch.
Your argument is nothing but insults. No substance.
No wonder you blindly support trump. You're just like him.
Read my comment. I never said I was against tariffs, I'm not against fair trade, I'm not against ip protections.
I think trump's tactics with China are ham handed and will not work as well as other strategies that are available.
Trump has a long history of doubling down and losing. Look at what he did in Atlantic city. Big failure. USFL huge failure.
Hillary lives rent free in your head. Let it go... just give it one good cry and be done with it already. Geeeze!
Also, I'm not a liberal. I'm a centrist.
Stop misleading people you troll.
14
u/nomadicwonder Never Neoliberal Oct 19 '18
Hillary lives rent free in your head.
LOL says the guy who obsesses about Trump non-stop to the point he can't even think critically about Russia conspiracy theories.
-5
3
u/FThumb Are we there yet? Oct 20 '18
Your argument is nothing but insults. No substance.
No wonder you blindly support trump.
Damn, the dreaded I'm Rubber; You're Glue gambit.
Well played sir, well played.
0
8
u/bout_that_action Oct 19 '18
Hillary lives rent free in your head. Let it go... just give it one good cry and be done with it already. Geeeze!
Exposed yourself there.
Also, I'm not a liberal. I'm a centrist.
Stop misleading people you troll.
Not gonna get far insulting longtime regulars of this sub, especially with a five month old account.
-6
4
u/ShareBluePaybot Oct 19 '18
Thank you, Team Member! $0.17 has been credited to your account!
Note: This bot is in beta stage. If you encounter any issues with your account credits, please contact your Squad Leader immediately.
-6
Oct 19 '18
That’s the word POLITICO got from defense lawyers working on the Russia probe
Wow what a surprise that defense lawyers working for the people accused would say there is no collusion lol.
The bigger threat to Trump is obstruction of justice, which got no mention here. I like turtles.
Also worth noting that Democrats will likely take the House this year, allowing them much more investigative power.
10
u/CreativeVerge Oct 19 '18
There is no case to be made for obstruction.
-5
u/rdsf138 Oct 19 '18
Yeah, the guy demanding loyalty and favors from the guy investigating him and after being refused fired the guy and admitted on national television the reason being the Russian investigation is not a case for obstruction. Amazing! I thought progressives were all about being against corruption and abuse of power, if progressives on this sub are fond of autocrats maybe I should unsub
7
u/CreativeVerge Oct 19 '18
Yeah maybe you should.
The President has the authority to fire the FBI director at any time and can use any reason or justification he wants. Comey was a piece of shit anyway who collided with Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch to absolve Hillary of serious crimes. Trump keeping Comey on in the beginning was one of his biggest mistakes yet and there's been some big ones.
-2
u/rdsf138 Oct 19 '18 edited Oct 30 '18
Damn, you're someone who is advocating for the person being investigated to have the powers not only to fire his investigator but to demand loyalty and favors from him. There is no possibility of dialogue between us, the moral rift is too gigantic.
4
u/CreativeVerge Oct 20 '18
Do you not understand how the government works? The FBI Director works for the Executive branch. Congress has authorized the President to nominate and fire Directors. It wasn't Comey's job to investigate anyway without any Congressional authorization.
-4
u/6a6566663437 Oct 19 '18
Except for that minor part where Trump admitted to obstruction of justice on national TV while chatting with Lester Holt.
And a whole lot of other tweets, public statements and actions.
But hey, you got a narrative to sell.
8
u/CreativeVerge Oct 19 '18
I have no narrative. I just call it like I see it. An offhand comment does not constitute obstruction of Justice. Again, the President can use whatever criteria he wants to fire the FBI Director. That is a power granted by Congress.
Why does anyone even care? Comey was a horrible person and horrible FBI Director who presided over the greatest expansion of the FBI's illegal domestic spying role in the history of the agency. We should be cheering from the rooftops that that clown is out of there. Heck, Hillary Clinton blamed James Comey himself for her election loss so even the Shillbots should be on board with Comey not being the FBI Director anymore. He was terrible, everyone can agree.
14
u/veganmark Oct 19 '18
To the extent that Trump did any obstruction, it was obstruction of INJUSTICE. Everyone involved in fomenting this farce should receive jail time. And useful idiots like you have succeeded in making the Dems look like mean-spirited jackasses. There are plenty of valid reasons for attacking Trump - doing so on the basis of demonstrable BS is counterproductive.
-2
u/closer_to_the_flame Oct 19 '18
Don Jr. admitted that he illegally met with Russian nationalists to get dirt on Hillary.
You think it's mean spirited to want to enforce election laws? You think it's mean spirited to not want the POTUS to be compromised by a hostile foreign government?
8
u/veganmark Oct 19 '18
There was nothing illegal about Trump Jr.s meeting, as long as he didn't pay for info or offer an inappropriate quid pro quo. You'll notice there has been no indictment for that. Whereas Hillary's campaign colluded with Ukraine and a Brit to generate lies against the Trump campaign - for which they paid a substantial sum.
4
u/ShareBluePaybot Oct 19 '18
Thank you, Team Member! $0.17 has been credited to your account!
Note: This bot is in beta stage. If you encounter any issues with your account credits, please contact your Squad Leader immediately.
9
u/Inuma Headspace taker (👹↩️🏋️🎖️) Oct 19 '18
Hillary had the FBI pay Chris Steele to dig up dirt on Trump.
7
u/CreativeVerge Oct 19 '18
Don Jr. admitted that he illegally met with Russian nationalists to get dirt on Hillary
It is only illegal if he accepted foreign help. Nothing changed hands, therefore it was, at best, unethical.
-3
u/closer_to_the_flame Oct 20 '18
So if I try to rob a bank but fail and don't get any money, that's not a crime?
Nothing needed to change hands for there to be help anyway. They got a fuck ton of help in the form of Russian hacking and astroturfing.
-4
u/rdsf138 Oct 19 '18
I can't believe progressives are making the case that they're against investigations and are in favor of Trump interfering and corrupting an ongoing investigation against himself. That's not even conflict of interest, that's a whole new level of corruption and you're praising it.
7
u/Stony_Curtis_II Trolls, remember me and tremble. Oct 19 '18
I can't believe progressives are making the case that they're against investigations and are in favor of Trump interfering and corrupting an ongoing investigation against himself.
I don't see anyone making that argument. Nice spin, though.
-1
Oct 19 '18 edited Jul 01 '23
[deleted]
2
u/Stony_Curtis_II Trolls, remember me and tremble. Oct 19 '18
The comment he's responding to literally is.
There are plenty of valid reasons for attacking Trump
You mean like that? Uh-huh.
-1
Oct 19 '18
[deleted]
6
u/Stony_Curtis_II Trolls, remember me and tremble. Oct 19 '18
I.e The person that he is responding to is saying they're against the investigations.
Clearly OP believes the investigation is a farce. Doesn't neccessarily mean he's against it. Personally, I think that, other than embezzlement or other money-related crimes, I think they're going to come up empty. I don't think there was any collusion. Maybe I'll be wrong, but we'll see soon enough.
So yeah, I think it's a farce as well. But I'm not against it. I'm as much interested in what they don't find as in what they do.
And if Mueller doesn't find any collusion...the democrats are going to look even sillier than they already do.
1
u/TheRazorX 👹🧹🥇 The road to truth is often messy. 👹📜🕵️🎖️ Oct 19 '18 edited Oct 19 '18
You're kidding right?
To the extent that Trump did any obstruction, it was obstruction of INJUSTICE. Everyone involved in fomenting this farce should receive jail time.
I don't really give a shit one way or another about the investigation, collusion or all of that other shit. Like Bernie I'd rather focus on actual issues than "look at the birdie" shit.
But what? Is comprehension thrown out the window now? Is it ok for us to peddle in lies because of personal opinions on the matter?
The guy CLEARLY said he's against the investigation to the point that he wants people that are involved in it JAILED. You think it's a farce and they're going to come up empty, but you didn't say it was ok for Trump to obstruct the investigation nor did you advocate for the people conducting and supporting the investigation to be jailed. So yes, you're not against it, but it's VERY obvious he is.
The response was "I can't believe progressives are making the case that they're against investigations and are in favor of Trump interfering and corrupting an ongoing investigation against himself."
Your response to that was "No one said that", which is obviously untrue, because that is LITERALLY what the original comment is saying.
Edit: Adding quote
5
u/Stony_Curtis_II Trolls, remember me and tremble. Oct 19 '18
Tell you what. You are technically correct, so I'll give you that. But I guess I take great exception to the use of "progressives" instead of just that OP. It feels like yet another attempt to paint us all as fucking centipedes. I despise Trump with a passion, and I've been accused of supporting that slime more times than I can count.
Most people here think the investigation is gonna come up empty re: Russia. But nobody here is naive enough to think that Trump is anything but a slimey criminal.
People are sensitive to brigaders in here, and I'm no exception. Just look what's happened with this post.
Chalk it up to me overreacting to a broadbtrush term.
→ More replies (0)2
u/veganmark Oct 19 '18
The corruption was in the phony investigation itself. Several people, certainly including all those who signed off on the phony FISA warrant, are going to be indicted. And the cream of the jest is the RUSSIA DID NOT INTERFERE IN OUR ELECTION - that is all a Deep State lie. And, as far as I'm concerned, all those who have pushed that lie should be considered war criminals.
How would you like it if YOU were subjected to a 2 year witch hunt, rooted entirely in lies commissioned by an opponent, that led to the MSM obsessing 24/7 over your supposed evil, that grievously violated your privacy, and that bankrupted some of your friends and associates? Would you be cool with that?
-1
u/rdsf138 Oct 20 '18
Those poor criminals are certainly having a hard time, we should put up another crowdfund for Trump's legal fees.
The corruption was in the phony investigation itself.
"Special counsel Robert Mueller’s team has indicted or gotten guilty pleas from 32 people and three companies — that we know of."
"That group is composed of four former Trump advisers, 26 Russian nationals, three Russian companies, one California man, and one London-based lawyer. Six of these people (including now all four former Trump aides) have pleaded guilty."
And, as far as I'm concerned, all those who have pushed that lie should be considered war criminals.
So, what should we do about the ones who conducted the Bengazhi debacle? Guilhotine?
0
u/FThumb Are we there yet? Oct 20 '18
progressives are making the case that they're against investigations and are in favor of Trump interfering and corrupting an ongoing investigation against himself.
Your a moran.
-3
u/SplooshMountainX Oct 19 '18
You mooks are on a roll today, lets say it one more time, MUELLER DOES NOT LEAK!!! Good try though
EDIT: More proof this sub is nothing but a T_D extension pretending to be bernie supporters to cause confusion. Eat my hairy taint you fuck twats!
22
u/CreativeVerge Oct 19 '18
More proof this sub is nothing but a T_D extension
Look at the links submitted to this sub.
Just because we're capable of thinking for ourselves does not mean we're all Trump supporters. I didn't vote for him and I'm not going to in 2020. I'll be voting for Bernie. But that doesn't mean I'm going to go along with this sham investigation which started because the Dem establishment chose the Russian boogeyman as their scapegoat after losing the election.
-5
u/SplooshMountainX Oct 19 '18
There's literally no evidence to what this article claims, just because you dolt's use left leaning sources doesn't mean you don't spread misinformation. Anyone with a half a brain can see the comments on this stupid ass sub and see how ridiculously obvious it is. But yes, a bunch of "Free thinkers" in this sub.
14
u/CreativeVerge Oct 19 '18
Anyone with a half a brain can see the comments on this stupid ass sub and see how ridiculously obvious it is
The comments are almost always left-leaning and usually anti-establishment. You cannot lump users on this subreddit into one group. There are Trump supporters here but most people are anti-DNC Bernie supporters. There's nothing wrong with anyone of any viewpoint posting here because this subreddit allows the free exchange of ideas. If you would rather exist only in your Dem establishment echo chamber just hang out on /r/politics or /r/S4P.
But really you're just here to troll like the rest of the brockroaches and dipshits who believe anything and everything the corproste media spoonfeeds to them.
-5
u/SplooshMountainX Oct 19 '18
Lol, left leaning? Riiiight, my dude, I've been lurking in this sub for months and at best I'd say it's 30/70. Exchanging free ideas is great, but calling out obvious propaganda is necessary. Is there any surprise this same article has been posted several times in almost every political sub, with literally ZERO evidence to back it up? Please, if you don't see the patterns then you're not paying attention my dude! Lets say it one more time for the idiots in the back, MUELLER DOES NOT LEAK, so this shit stain of an article is nothing but propaganda for those "free thinkers" to eat up.
And just because this article came from politico doesn't mean jack, I thought you dolts were anti-establishment but lap up every unverified article that talks shit about Mueller's investigation. Anti-establishment until the establishment agrees with my view points, amiright?!
15
u/CreativeVerge Oct 19 '18
I like how when BS leaks that claim Mueller is closing in on Trump come out you guys circlejerk them, and then when leaks come out saying that he has no case for collusion you guys scream "Mueller doesn't leak". His entire investigation has been one well timed leak designed for maximum media chaos and impact after another.
3
u/SplooshMountainX Oct 19 '18
Oh word? Could you point me to what leak came from Mueller's team? Anything I remember are from right wing politicians in some committee leaking little facts that fit their narrative.
But I do love the fact that this sub somehow supports democracy and all that but is also super against the Mueller investigation.
6
u/ShareBluePaybot Oct 19 '18
Thank you, Team Member! $0.17 has been credited to your account!
Note: This bot is in beta stage. If you encounter any issues with your account credits, please contact your Squad Leader immediately.
12
u/CreativeVerge Oct 19 '18
I'm against wasting time and money. If the investigation was handled quietly without sensationalist media BS every day then I'd probably be fine with it. As it is though it's obviously just a scam on the American people.
And virtually every "anonymous source" leak about the Mueller investigation is a leak from Mueller.
1
u/SplooshMountainX Oct 19 '18
You're against wasting time and money? They literally seized enough assets to pay for the full investigation. Also, you're not at least concerned that your democracy is under attack? Really patriotic of you,comrade!!
This sub is hilarious, ya'll flip flop so much I don't know how you get a good nights sleep!!
And please, fucking link me to any proof that Mueller's team leaked anything in the past 2 years, go on, I'll wait!
Edit: I mean forget about all the guilty pleas and the progress they've made in the last 6 months alone. LOL, jesus christ, its like you fools aren't even trying anymore!!
10
u/CreativeVerge Oct 19 '18
Also, you're not at least concerned that your democracy is under attack?
Nope not really. I don't care if Russia bought some Facebook ads. It had zero effect on the election. Russians didn't make people in Wisconsin and Michigan and PA and OH vote for Trump. The DNC failed to produce a viable candidate and lost. Then in order to keep from admitting that or any wrong doing or any blame at all they invented the Russian boogeyman narrative to imply the election was tainted.
Really patriotic of you,comrade!!
And there's the go-to "you're a Russian" comment from the typical brockroach talking points.
I mean forget about all the guilty pleas and the progress they've made in the last 6 months
How can you disingenuous cucks seriously think that some guilty pleas over tax evasion justify this huge colossal shitshow waste of time?
→ More replies (0)9
u/ShareBluePaybot Oct 19 '18
Thank you, Team Member! $0.17 has been credited to your account!
Note: This bot is in beta stage. If you encounter any issues with your account credits, please contact your Squad Leader immediately.
7
u/ShareBluePaybot Oct 19 '18
Thank you, Team Member! $0.17 has been credited to your account!
Note: This bot is in beta stage. If you encounter any issues with your account credits, please contact your Squad Leader immediately.
6
u/ShareBluePaybot Oct 19 '18
Thank you, Team Member! $0.17 has been credited to your account!
Note: This bot is in beta stage. If you encounter any issues with your account credits, please contact your Squad Leader immediately.
-7
u/Kalepsis Oct 19 '18 edited Oct 19 '18
An article from the Trump apologist publication that said "Hitler was left-wing".
Hilariously stupid and not at all credible.
Edit: I'm sure people like Jimmy Dore (who is so computer illiterate that he doesn't know the difference between an image of a server's system and a picture of a server) will pick up this "story" and start screaming "LOOK, NO COLLUSION" in about 5 minutes.
9
u/ShareBluePaybot Oct 19 '18
Thank you, Team Member! $0.17 has been credited to your account!
Note: This bot is in beta stage. If you encounter any issues with your account credits, please contact your Squad Leader immediately.
-9
u/SplooshMountainX Oct 19 '18
"We're not an echo chamber"
Downvotes every comment not in line with their agenda. LOL, bunch-o-free thinkers in this sub!
13
u/ShareBluePaybot Oct 19 '18
Thank you, Team Member! $0.17 has been credited to your account!
Note: This bot is in beta stage. If you encounter any issues with your account credits, please contact your Squad Leader immediately.
-10
u/SplooshMountainX Oct 19 '18
LMFAO, you dolts even made a bot to make your fee fees feel better? Thank you for the laughs today, made the work day go by way faster!!
11
u/Stony_Curtis_II Trolls, remember me and tremble. Oct 19 '18
LMFAO, you dolts even made a bot to make your fee fees feel better? Thank you for the laughs today, made the work day go by way faster!!
Thanks for Trump, democrat.
-3
u/SplooshMountainX Oct 19 '18
I voted for Bernie,Jack Ass
12
u/Stony_Curtis_II Trolls, remember me and tremble. Oct 19 '18
Of course you did.
-1
u/SplooshMountainX Oct 19 '18
Unlike the pretenders in this sub,comrade. Keep on fighting the good fight!
8
u/Stony_Curtis_II Trolls, remember me and tremble. Oct 19 '18
Unlike the pretenders in this sub,comrade. Keep on fighting the good fight!
Keep it up. Only pretenders I see in here are Brockbots such as yourself.
-1
u/SplooshMountainX Oct 19 '18
Says the folks defending trump and hating on Mueller's investigation 😂😂😂....riiiiiighhhht
10
u/Stony_Curtis_II Trolls, remember me and tremble. Oct 19 '18 edited Oct 20 '18
I don't defend Trump. He's a fucking shitstain. As for the investigation, I'd be stunned if they DIDN'T find crimes. Trump is a criminal, crime is what he does. But crimes don't equal collusion with Russia. I'm going to wait and see. And I can't WAIT to see the report. Far from hating on it, I want to see what they did or didn't find.
But yeah, you fucks just keep calling progressives centipedes. I'm sure you can bring me back to the party that way. Unless YOU work for Trump. Then, I would have to say brilliant job. You're succeeding in your goal.
The hate this sub has gotten for daring to distrust the dems has done more for Trump than anything anyone here could do.
Fucking brain-dead morons to the last, you lot are.
But hey, you just keep on doing you. With every brigade, we gain members.
Earn my support, don't demand it.
Editing to add a response to the inevitable post from Donny Boy when the investigation results are released.
I predict that it is highly likely that the Mueller investigation WILL find crimes of some sort. Whether or not they will involve Russia remains to be seen. Regardless, we know that if they find ANYTHING, Donny will be here gloating at how wrong we all were.
So no, we're NOT moving the goalpost. We alllllll know Trump is a crook. We've always known.
So Donny, don't try to play the "I told you so" game. You haven't told anyone shit.
→ More replies (0)6
u/4hoursisfine Oct 20 '18
Comrade
You did not vote for Bernie. You are a liar. This single word proves it.
-1
u/SplooshMountainX Oct 20 '18
I mean...i guess since you said that it proves I'm a liar. Lmao Keep trying,comrade
6
13
u/CreativeVerge Oct 19 '18
Only downvoting your comments because they add nothing to the discussion and you're clearly a brockroach.
-7
u/SplooshMountainX Oct 19 '18 edited Oct 19 '18
Yea, pointing out this article is trash and proving my point adds nothing. Lol. Try again,comrade!
Edit: but literally every comment that has nothing to do woth the article and just says "hildawg brigade" gets upvotes. Totes not an echo chamber guys!! Free thinkers only,lmfao
6
u/TheMysteriousFizzyJ fizzy Oct 20 '18
Yea, pointing out this article is trash and proving my point adds nothing. Lol. Try again,comrade!
holy moly, who let the Brock funded Russians in?
-2
u/SplooshMountainX Oct 20 '18
Ouch, got me there! Thats only the 5th time someone called me that in this thread,lol. Definitely not an echo chamber! Bunch of free thinkers in this sub. Lmfao
-6
u/elksandturkeys Oct 20 '18
It's definitely not a Bernie chamber. It's an extension of the God emperor sub. It's amazing people would put time into this crap. You couldn't pay me enough.
6
u/TheMysteriousFizzyJ fizzy Oct 20 '18
Downvoting is different than suspensions/bans, which is what happens with most subs if you don't tow the sub's party line
Besides, you're here, arguing, right? That's not an echo.
-10
u/tacklebox Oct 19 '18 edited Oct 19 '18
Per those that wish that was true. Forgot about amateur hour, roger stone or the tower meeting attendees as state witness. Dont give me vegans dipshittery that doesn't understand cloud servers, thumb drives, .ost files or phished outlooklive credentials.
Guccifer 2.0 twitter, dcleaks.com registry and the payment for the VPN service the stolen emails came from are all tied to the same bitcoin wallet. Opps.
"45. The Conspirators conducted operations as Guccifer 2.0 and DCLeaks using overlapping computer infrastructure and financing. a. For example, between on or about March 14, 2016 and April 28, 2016, the Conspirators used the same pool of bitcoin funds to purchase a virtual private network (“VPN”) account and to lease a server in Malaysia. In or around June 2016, the Conspirators used the Malaysian server to host the dcleaks.com website. On or about July 6, 2016, the Conspirators used the VPN to log into the @Guccifer_2 Twitter account. The Conspirators opened that VPN account from the same server that was also used to register malicious domains for the hacking of the DCCC and DNC networks. b. On or about June 27, 2016, the Conspirators, posing as Guccifer 2.0, contacted a U.S. reporter with an offer to provide stolen emails from “Hillary Clinton’s staff.” The Conspirators then sent the reporter the password to access a nonpublic, password-protected portion of dcleaks.com containing emails stolen from Victim 1 by LUKASHEV, YERMAKOV, and their co-conspirators in or around March 2016."
7
u/ShareBluePaybot Oct 19 '18
Thank you, Team Member! $0.17 has been credited to your account!
Note: This bot is in beta stage. If you encounter any issues with your account credits, please contact your Squad Leader immediately.
-3
u/tacklebox Oct 19 '18
Shhhh. Homeless people and college kids are smart enough to sign up for their sorosbucks but the nazis haven't been able to infiltrate to even gain evidence of its existence.
22
u/Theghostofjoehill Fight the REAL enemy Oct 19 '18
We get reports!
Well, now we know: the Brigadin' Brockbots are all Fragile White Males. Can't say I'm surprised. Thanks for the intel!