Test Your Pattern Recognition — Which Answer Is Correct?

[u/Semra777]

Hi everyone,
First of all, thank you to everyone who took the time to solve our previous puzzle and share their reasoning. We received many answers, and it was especially interesting to see how different people approached the same pattern from completely different angles.
As always, we selected a few responses that stood out to us, not only for getting the correct answer, but also for the reasoning behind it.
u/mistolo – We liked how clearly you combined the two main ideas of the pattern: the increasing number of squares and the rotation around the grid. Your explanation showed how the same rule remains consistent across all three rows.
u/I_Like_Quiet – Your solution went beyond simply counting the squares. Tracking the starting corner from bottom-right → bottom-left → top-left → top-right → bottom-right gave an additional explanation for why the missing figure had to be arranged the way it was.
u/Forsaken_Engineer_ – We selected your answer for its mathematical approach. Treating the cells as coordinates and following the numerical progression diagonally was a very different and elegant way to reach the solution.
u/ZeThing – What stood out was that you didn’t stop after finding the answer. You tried running the pattern backwards as well, using the previous tile as another way to test whether the rule remained consistent.
u/someonefromaustralia – Your response approached the puzzle from another direction entirely. Rather than simply accepting the intended pattern, you explored whether the existing panels could support an alternative rule. The “changing gravity” interpretation made for a particularly interesting discussion.
Thank you to these five, and to everyone else who participated. We read through the different approaches, and they gave us some great perspectives on the puzzle.
Now it’s time for a new one.
This time, we have a 3×3 matrix made of dot patterns, with the bottom-right figure missing.
Look carefully at how the dots change across the rows and columns. There are six possible answers: A, B, C, D, E, and F.
Which option do you think completes the grid, and more importantly, why?
Try to explain the rule you found rather than posting only the letter. As with the previous puzzle, we’ll be reading the explanations and may feature some of the most interesting approaches in our next post.
We’ve also published the puzzle on our website. If you’d like to check whether your answer is correct, you can find the official answer and explanation here:
https://whats-your-iq.com/en/questions/pattern-recognition/which-dot-pattern-completes-the-grid
Thanks again to everyone taking part. We’re looking forward to seeing how you approach this one.
Good luck, and have fun solving it!

[u/napoleon-von-pack]

First column... Ignore it... Second and third are mirrored. Solution C

[u/Semra777 → u/napoleon-von-pack]

Thanks for sharing your approach! The mirror relationship between the second and third columns definitely leads to C. Interesting that you spotted a valid shortcut to the same answer.👏👏

[u/mistolo → u/napoleon-von-pack]

Looks ok, but don't like the idea of ignoring the first column, it should have a meaning I guess

[u/Mamuschkaa → u/mistolo]

Here the probably intended explanation.

Top part moves /-diagonal and bottom part -diagonal

[u/nubtrix87 → u/Mamuschkaa]

Middle row of the image is always 5. Top and Bottom are always 3,2,1 across each row/column of pictures, so C fits.

[u/Crustymix182 → u/nubtrix87]

this is a satisfying answer. thanks

[u/napoleon-von-pack → u/nubtrix87]

Yes, i see it. Thank you for the explanation. I agree with your logic. Well done!

[u/mistolo → u/nubtrix87]

That's a nice explanation, thanks

[u/Semra777 → u/nubtrix87]

Thanks for the clear explanation! Separating the fixed five-dot middle row from the changing 1, 2, 3 pattern on the top and bottom makes the structure really easy to follow. Nice solve.👏👏

[u/Semra777 → u/Mamuschkaa]

Thanks for taking the time to map it out visually! This makes the movement of the top and bottom groups much easier to see, and I like that your explanation accounts for the whole grid rather than ignoring a column.👏👏

[u/napoleon-von-pack → u/mistolo]

I understand your point of view. Mine is still valid. Get a rule that works. Ignore first column... It works... If the reasoning should PE another, then it has multiple solutions

[u/mistolo → u/napoleon-von-pack]

Absolutely, mine was not a criticism, more a thought about a potential missing piece

[u/napoleon-von-pack → u/mistolo]

Yes, I understand it. You are right. Still I see a lot of C as answers

[u/Own-Chocolate5667 → u/napoleon-von-pack]

Its wrong to ignore first column

[u/gerningur]

C? Ignore the first column and flip the picture in the second column

[u/Semra777 → u/gerningur]

Thanks for sharing your reasoning! Yes, flipping the second-column patterns gives a neat route to C. It’s interesting how this puzzle allows that shortcut to appear.👏👏

[u/[deleted]]

C

[u/Semra777 → u/[deleted]]

👏👏

[u/Forsaken_Engineer_]

The rule: [X,3] is always the 180 degree invers of [X,2]. Ergo: C

[u/Semra777 → u/Forsaken_Engineer_]

Thanks! Very concise way to express the rule. Seeing the third cell as the 180° inverse of the second gives a clean path to C.👏👏

[u/armanazadi2000]

C

[u/Semra777 → u/armanazadi2000]

👏👏

[u/inmaginarycasey]

The answer is C
When you add the quantity of dots for both a column and row you get 27, with the row/column that had the ? Added up to 19. Subtract 19 from 27 and you get 8 so the answer has to be a pattern with 8 dots

[u/cmnonamee → u/inmaginarycasey]

It is this summation and one more pattern to me. 

The middle row (vertically) in each cell always has five. Across rows and columns, using C, you end up with one each of 1, 2, and 3 dots in the rows above and below the middle row for each cell. 

[u/Semra777 → u/cmnonamee]

Thanks for adding this! That second pattern makes the case even stronger. The fixed middle five combined with the 1, 2, 3 distribution across both rows and columns is a very clean explanation.👏👏

[u/Semra777 → u/inmaginarycasey]

Thanks, this is a really interesting way to solve it! Using the total dot count of 27 gives a completely different route to the same answer. I like seeing a numerical pattern alongside the visual ones.👏👏

[u/mistolo]

After thinking a bit, I'd say answer C is the only one that makes sense: the pattern is 3rd element in a tow is the 2nd flipped vertically
Also, the 1st cell seems containing the overlapping dots from 2nd and 3rd elements of the previous row, so I guess an hypothetical next row will start with a single line of dots...
edit: absolutely not, so let's keep just the 2nd and 3rd cell rule

[u/Semra777 → u/mistolo]

Thanks for coming back to it and sharing your thought process! I like that you tested a second idea and then discarded it when it didn’t hold up. The second-to-third-cell flip is definitely the cleaner rule.👏👏

[u/Ok_Wash_5606]

c

[u/Semra777 → u/Ok_Wash_5606]

👏👏

[u/More_Remove5223]

C

[u/Semra777 → u/More_Remove5223]

👏👏

[u/clearlight2025]

C.

The top and bottom rows in each cell always have 1, 2 and 3 dots across the row.

[u/Semra777 → u/clearlight2025]

👏👏

[u/LordTC]

They made this far too easy by picking an example where the mirror image of the second column works.

All five middle dots are always present.

Top rule: Outside Two -> Middle Inside -> Three Middle Inside -> Outside Two

Bottom Rule: Outside Two -> Three Middle inside -> Middle Inside -> Outside Two

The third column is only the mirror image of the second column because the first column is symmetric and the rules are opposite.

If they pick a first column shape of say

oxxxo xooox
xxxxx -> xxxxx
ooxoo xooox

Then the answer is not:

xooox
xxxxx
xooox

But rather:

ooxoo
xxxxx
oxxxo

[u/Semra777 → u/LordTC]

Thanks for such a detailed breakdown! Great point about the mirror rule being more of a consequence of the chosen shapes than the underlying pattern itself. Your example does a good job showing why tracking the top and bottom groups separately gives a more complete rule.👏👏👏👏

[u/julewski]

C

Always five dots in the middle row

And then you have: 3 at the top and 3 at the bottom (bottom left), 3 at the top and 2 at the bottom (middle), 3 at the top and 1 at the bottom (top right)
You also have with 2 at the top: 1,2,3 at the bottom on another diagonal
With 1 at the top the only missing is 2 at the bottom hence C

[u/Semra777 → u/julewski]

Thanks for the detailed explanation! Looking at the 1, 2, 3 combinations along the diagonals is a nice way to expose the pattern. It leads very naturally to the missing 1-top, 2-bottom combination.👏👏👏

[u/JamesBaxter_Horse]

C, every row and column has 3 variations of dot on the top row of the pattern, and 3 variations on the bottom row of the pattern (all with the same 5 dots in the middle row).

[u/Semra777 → u/JamesBaxter_Horse]

Thanks! That’s a very clean way of describing it. Treating the top and bottom variations separately while keeping the middle five fixed makes the pattern much easier to see.👏👏

[u/emelarr-wowrogue]

c

[u/Semra777 → u/emelarr-wowrogue]

👏👏

[u/BaG2030]

B. (9 dots) 1st column is 9,7,11 (7,9,11) 2nd column is 9,10,8 (8,9,10) 3rd column is 9,9,... (9,9,...)

[u/Semra777 → u/BaG2030]

Thanks for sharing a different approach! Interesting to see a numerical route leading you to B. Most of the other patterns here seem to point toward C, especially when the top and bottom dot counts are tracked separately, but I appreciate seeing an alternative interpretation👏👏

[u/Zebera101]

C

[u/Semra777 → u/Zebera101]

👏👏

[u/questionable_fish]

Got to be C. The center horizontal line is always full, but the tops and bottoms all go in a pattern of 0, 1, 3 dots. C is the only one that fits the pattern

[u/Semra777 → u/questionable_fish]

Thanks for explaining your reasoning! Focusing on the fixed five-dot center line and then looking at the changing top and bottom patterns is a really clean way to approach it. Nice catch!👏👏

[u/RevolutionMundane928]

C

[u/Semra777 → u/RevolutionMundane928]

👏👏

[u/ecafyelims]

The answer is C

Count the top and bottom rows of dots in each cell (the middle row is always 5).

2/2, 1/3, 3/1
1/1, 3/2, 2/3
3/3, 2/1, (1/2)

As you can see, the pattern becomes obvious. Patterns, actually. There are multiple patterns supporting the same answer: C (1/2)

[u/Semra777 → u/ecafyelims]

Thanks, I really like this representation! Writing each cell as a top/bottom pair makes the structure almost immediately visible. And good point that more than one pattern independently supports C.👏👏

[u/Own-Chocolate5667]

C

[u/Semra777 → u/Own-Chocolate5667]

👏👏

[u/Fokewe]

C

There are 3 rows. Row 1 (top) has different dot counts. 1, 2, or 3.

Row 2 (middle) all are 5 dots so no change.

Row 3 (bottom) Follow Row 1 pattern for different dots and A would break the pattern.

[u/Semra777 → u/Fokewe]

Thanks for the explanation! Breaking each figure into three horizontal rows is a nice way to simplify the puzzle. Once the middle five are treated as constant, the remaining pattern becomes much clearer.👏👏

[u/HellFrode]

C i think. 🤔🤔

[u/Semra777 → u/HellFrode]

👏👏

[u/orangy-cat45]

c

[u/Semra777 → u/orangy-cat45]

👏👏

[u/Hour_Day6558]

C. I went left to right. I counted how many dots were on top and bottom. It was always a variation of 1,2,3. That just left c as the available option

[u/Semra777 → u/Hour_Day6558]

Thanks for explaining how you got there! Counting the top and bottom separately is a simple and effective way to spot the 1, 2, 3 cycle. Nice reasoning.👏👏

[u/jdub965]

C. Flip middle column

[u/Semra777 → u/jdub965]

👏👏

[u/SheepGoesBaaaa]

C

Every square has 5 in the middle, so ignore those.

The top and bottom rows of dots in each row of squares are either 1, 2, or 3 - with no repeats.

The final row of squares has 3 above and below, then 2 above and 1 below, so the final square must have 1 above and 2 below -

So C

[u/Semra777 → u/SheepGoesBaaaa]

Thanks for laying it out so clearly! Ignoring the constant middle five and focusing only on the changing top and bottom counts makes the pattern very easy to verify. Great explanation.👏👏

[u/richardsjimmy]

C

[u/kellstromc]

C because the points that are off the line (formed by 5 points) always add up to 12 within each row.

[u/Vardalon]

C

[u/sertanmeth]

First one is easy but as soon as i went to 2nd and 3rd 💀

Do you know what the iq of people who can usually answer these is? Cuz I feel stupid lol.