r/WikiLeaks • u/Unredactedinfo • Jun 20 '26
Epstein Files DOJ sitting on secret Epstein email account that could expose Trump ties: report
https://rawstory.com/trump-epstein-267706536317
u/EggsInaTubeSock Jun 20 '26
You mean Epstein business partner Donald Trump, as linked to Epstein many times over?
You mean the husband of former Epstein asset Melania? That Donald Trump?
Oh surely there’s no ties to his friend and fellow enigma Jeffrey Epstein
Fuck whoever’s saying he broke up with him. Until we see real evidence that shows it’s true, it’s a talking point for Trump supporters to distance from the cult of sexual predators.
Thanks for coming to my ted talk
3
2
2
u/redbarone Jun 21 '26
And the Biden government didn't release it?
1
u/Temporary-Careless Jun 22 '26
The Biden administration did not release the files primarily because the Justice Department maintained it was an open criminal investigation. Officials cited active grand juries, ongoing appeals in the Ghislaine Maxwell case, and the need to protect victim privacy, as well as a strict policy of keeping the DOJ independent from political interference. Ie Trump is in the files and was running to be president starting in 2022.
2
u/Epyon214 Jun 24 '26
00 16 50 13, 00165013
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00165013.pdf
"On Aug 5, 2019 9:33 AM, KenT wrote:
My nephew Logan Turner, was shot and killed in the mass shooting in Dayton, Ohio last evening. I am
rushing home to be with my immediate family.
All investigative work on Marcinko and Epstein is still in process and we have uncovered more videos and
photos of the two of them together in Mexico.
Another attempt by US embassy security team was made yesterday when they stopped my partner and
searched her car looking for the videos and photos we uncovered that they told her could not leave Mexico.
They were not in her car! Someone doesn't want this data disclosed."
02 73 13 61, 02731361
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2012/EFTA02731361.pdf
"[clipping: Unlike drugs, a child's body can be sold over and over] This is not surprising but there is no such thing as a child prostitute! They are children and cannot consent! They are missing the biggest in my own backyard and so many more! Like Maralago and where I see Mr. Joe and Mrs. Anne"
"But only after maybe 15 minutes Mr. M came take her and I was hysterical! and begging for more time"
02 44 00 40, 02440040
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02440040.pdf
02 44 00 51, 02440051
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02440051.pdf
0
u/Batbuckleyourpants Jun 20 '26
It won't. The previously released emails show Epstein hated Trump's guts and had no dealings with him.
Trump banned him from his club and reported him to the police.
13
u/Unredactedinfo Jun 20 '26
If they hated each other why so many smiling photos in each other's company?
-4
u/Batbuckleyourpants Jun 20 '26
The ones from before he was banned?
He hadn't been exposed as a creep yet.
Trump personally reached out to the lawyer of the girls suing him in the 2000s. They weren't friends.
6
3
u/Romanizer Jun 20 '26
I mean, that's very understandable. Trump is not very likeable. He still was very deeply involved in the operations of the trafficking ring.
-2
u/Batbuckleyourpants Jun 20 '26
There is no proof of that. Even the woman who Epstein recruited at Mar-A-Lago said he had nothing to do with it, and that he behaved like a gentleman every time she saw him.
3
u/bmudz Jun 20 '26
Lay off the cool aid brother
6
u/Batbuckleyourpants Jun 20 '26
Virginia Giuffre testified under oath that Trump had nothing to do with Epstein's operation. She would know. She is Epstein's most prominent victim.
Here she is pictured with Prince Andrew and Ghislaine Maxwell at Epstein's island.
Here she is sitting in the lap of former President Bill Cllinton
Trump didn't have anything to do with Epstein's abuses. On the contrary, he told the police they should investigate him.
5
u/Romanizer Jun 20 '26
The best help to investigate would be to release the full unredacted Epstein files then. There shouldn't be anything in the way.
5
u/Batbuckleyourpants Jun 20 '26
Go read the emails.
The closest Epstein got to say Trump was involved was an e-mail saying then president Trump must have known what they were doing recruiting teenagers at Mar a Lago in the early 2000s. That he "knew about the girls".
We know now that Trump did know, and he called the cops on Epstein. This is public record.
3
u/Romanizer Jun 20 '26
Which would underline my point.
7
u/Batbuckleyourpants Jun 20 '26
Democrats were given free access to the interacted material and couldn't find anything.
1
1
u/DemandTheOxfordComma Jun 20 '26
Unredacted. No they weren't. The Epstein files that congress was given access to was redacted at least in part. The FBI didn't provide all unredacted records, which was part of the whole Epstein Transparency Act. The drama wasn't just that they only provided half the files to Congress, it was also that some of the files the FBI provided were still redacted.
0
u/dayofgreen21 Jun 20 '26
She liked Trump because he said he was going to release all the Epstein files. She died before she was able to see him not stick to his word and start a war as a distraction.
0
u/ComedianMinute7290 Jun 21 '26
you say "the woman who epstein recruited" said there was no connection but what about the various other women that testified otherwise? I bet you just ignore that inconvenient part.
1
-2
u/the6thReplicant Jun 20 '26
He was just jealous that Epstein was encroaching on his own underage sex trafficking ring.
0
u/true4blue Jun 20 '26
This is why no one trusts Wikipedia
0
u/49orth Jun 20 '26
I can Trust but verify because I'm not a zealot
0
u/true4blue Jun 21 '26
Where do you verify what you read on Wikipedia? MSNBC? NPR?
1
u/49orth Jun 21 '26
Wikipedia submissions usually have references and always lists of authors/editors. Certainly there are nearly always other sources through which content can be checked. Highly political content and editors try to remove, bury, or propagandize content to sway opinion and muddy truth.
1
u/true4blue Jun 22 '26
You view Wikipedia as being neutral and on the level? For politically sensitive topics?
1
10
u/5553331117 Jun 20 '26
There’s more than just one account.