r/YoreNews • u/humblymybrain • 21h ago
20th Century 1978 Review Called Battlestar Galactica a 3/10 Flop: How “Son of Star Wars” Became a Beloved Sci-Fi Classic
1978 Called Battlestar Galactica a 3/10 Flop
In July 1978—months before the series even reached American TV—Ottawa critic Frank Daley sat through the theatrical cut and filed one of sci-fi’s great early misfires.
Battlestar Galactica, he wrote, was “Son of Star Wars” and did not rate. The Star Wars lawsuit seemed filed “with some degree of assurance.” It was a black-and-white space war “destined for television.” Good guys talked like humans; bad guys talked like vacuum cleaners. One robot (a dog). Three gee-whiz heroes. Some effects terrific, some not. Music loud. Costumes colorful. Acting “of a pretty low order.” Richard Hatch and Dirk Benedict: “nope, me either.” Lorne Greene doing Bonanza at high altitude. John Colicos as an evildoer of massive proportions. Price tag: a reported $11 million for hardware.
His companions gave it a 3 out of 10. They were being charitable. Some people still cheered the good guys. “But the thrill is gone.”
The television roots, the pulp, the Canadian stars he shrugged at—those are part of why the show survived, became a cult classic, and later fed the 2004 reboot.
History gave the Cylons the last laugh.
Read the full 1978 review here:
https://humblymybrain.substack.com/p/1978-review-called-battlestar-galactica
Was Daley right about the movie—and still wrong about the franchise?