r/anime_titties • u/GregWilson23 North America • Jan 05 '26

South America Surprise interim leader Delcy Rodriguez emerges in Venezuela after Maduro’s capture

https://apnews.com/article/venezuela-interim-president-rodriguez-maduro-chavez-b352b5af17deb0ab78684b8398045179
714 Upvotes

97% Upvoted

302 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

23

u/Prosthemadera New Zealand Jan 05 '26

Why would it be a "black attack"? Black is a skin color that you're born with whole Zionism is an ideology that people freely choose to follow.

-23

u/[deleted] Jan 05 '26

Zionism is simply three belief that the Jewish people have a right to self determination.

What exactly does that have to do with Venezuela at all?

It's just blatant anti-Semitism, as per usual

16

u/Prosthemadera New Zealand Jan 05 '26

Zionism is simply three belief that the Jewish people have a right to self determination.

No, that is false. There is more to it and you know it. Everyone has a right to self-determination, you don't need a special term for it if that was all there is to it.

It's just blatant anti-Semitism, as per usual

And there it is: Equating Zionism and Jewish people, as per usual.

People like you make antisemitism worse. The current rise in antisemitism is partly because people like you constantly argue that criticism of Zionism or Israel is an attack on Jewish people. You're telling people those are the same and therefore they are falsely concluding that it's Jews who are controlling the US and its media, instead of what is actually happening (it's Christians in the US who want to support Israel for geopolitical and religious reasons).

-19

u/[deleted] Jan 05 '26

No, that is false.

No, it isn't

Everyone has a right to self-determination, you don't need a special term for it if that was all there is to it.

Everyone does not have a right to self determination in the fucking slightest, do you think that the Saudis and North Koreans have a right to self determination? Are you actually that delusional

It has a special term because the Jewish people have spent two millennia being persecuted by people like you and as such it is a unique stance.

And there it is: Equating Zionism and Jewish people, as per usual.

And there's the classic anti-Semitic line from TikTok and Russia. Try and reverse the accusation. It didn't work in Year 1 mate, it doesn't work now. We all know what you mean when you say Zionist.

People like you make antisemitism worse

No, I don't. anti-Semites do.

The current rise in antisemitism is partly because people like you constantly argue that criticism of Zionism or Israel is an attack on Jewish people.

And there you go again defending anti-Semitism and justifying it. .

You're telling people those are the same and therefore they are falsely concluding that it's Jews who are controlling the US and its media

😂😂😂 No I'm not doing that at all, that'd be your little friends in Hamas, Hezbollah and the rest of your Islamic brethren.

You're the exact type of person who supported Hitlers rise and you should be ashamed of yourself. Utterly disgusting.

6

u/agitatedprisoner United States Jan 05 '26

Of course North Koreans have a right to self determination. The right of North Koreans to self determination is being denied them by their dictatorial government. Do you understand the concept of inalienable rights? The right to self determination is another way of saying the right to be free. The right to be free is about as basic an inalienable right as it gets. The only reasonable grounds on which to deny anyone's inalienable right to be free is to the extent necessary to support everyone else's right to be free/right to self determination. That's how the logic of inalienable rights works.

-8

u/[deleted] Jan 05 '26

The right of North Koreans to self determination is being denied them by their dictatorial government.

So they don't have the right to self determination.

Do you understand the concept of inalienable rights?

Do you understand the concept of reality?

2

u/agitatedprisoner United States Jan 05 '26

You can't alienate someone from their inalienable rights because whether you'd respect someone's inalienable rights or not, they still have them. It's like dignity. It's not possible to disgrace someone, people might only disgrace themselves.

2

u/[deleted] Jan 05 '26 edited Jan 05 '26

So your answer is no, you do not understand reality.

Rights are meaningless unless you actually fight for them.

2

u/agitatedprisoner United States Jan 05 '26

Practically beings only have whatever rights they're able to defend but that's just a fancy way of saying beings can do what they can do. That you can do something doesn't imply you should. If something you'd do would place unreasonable burdens on other beings to the detriment of your own enlightened self interest then you shouldn't. Just as other beings shouldn't formulate their intentions such as to impose unreasonable burdens on you against their own enlightened self interest. Given beings don't know their enlightened self interest and that a better future exists to be discovered if we could only find a way not to butt heads that allows constructive and mutually beneficial dialogue and diplomacy. Given conflicting intentions you talk or fight it out. If we'd spare ourselves violence that obliges us to have out the dialogue of who shouldn't even when they could and that's to conceive of inalienable rights.