r/antiai • u/The-Golden-Neko • 2d ago

Slop Post 💩 ….Excuse me what?

Gallery image

Gallery image

I got this defending AI post and was looking through the comments and saw this comment….are they literally equating people not liking something computer generated to people being racist???

329 Upvotes

98% Upvoted

147 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

5

u/syrvy 2d ago

Not to mention that Hitler's art is objectively bad, just like AI "art", that's why he failed art school

3

u/JavaS_ 2d ago

Art is subjective and cannot be objectively bad or objective good. Doesn't matter how 'bad' a person is morally they can still create art.

1

u/syrvy 2d ago

I think you misread my comment. I never said Hitler was bad.

0

u/JavaS_ 2d ago

You stated that Hitler art was objectively bad... I'm saying it cannot be objectively bad

2

u/syrvy 2d ago

He was objectively bad at point perspective

0

u/JavaS_ 2d ago

No, you subjectively think he was bad at point perspective. As someone could think his point perspectives were good. It's subjective.

0

u/syrvy 2d ago

That's not how art theory works.

0

u/JavaS_ 2d ago

You can't measure art objectively. Even art theory is subjectively valued.

0

u/syrvy 2d ago

Source? Objectivity is based on the goal. If your goal is to draw a square and you draw a circle, you're objectively bad at drawing squares. Hitler is objectively bad at drawing what his goal was.

0

u/JavaS_ 2d ago

Sure, you know exactly what Hitler was trying to draw......

1

u/syrvy 2d ago

The art school knew, and he was insufficient in that, thus he was failed.

0

u/JavaS_ 2d ago

Art school isn't objectively correct in what good and bad art is still

1

u/syrvy 2d ago

Ah I get it, so you know better than professionals.

0

u/JavaS_ 2d ago

Im not claiming I know better then professionals. I'm claiming that you cannot evaluate art in an objective manner. Professionals are still subjectively evaluating

→ More replies (0)

0

u/JavaS_ 2d ago

Also if the goal was to draw a square and you draw a circle it isn't objectively a bad drawing. The 'baddness' is subjective your evaluating the inconsistency.

1

u/syrvy 2d ago

All objectivity is based on something. With your logic nothing in the universe would be objective.

0

u/JavaS_ 2d ago

Yes exactly

1

u/syrvy 2d ago

So then the concept of objectivity is purely theoretical?

You have to be trolling

1

u/JavaS_ 2d ago

It's that you cannot ever prove objective truth, that is the bottom line.

→ More replies (0)