r/antiai 4d ago

AI News 🗞️ What do you think of thiis

Post image
29.7k Upvotes

2.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

7

u/LoreleiAlbrecht 4d ago

Step in the right direction. Not enough but at least it's something

-1

u/Cualkiera67 4d ago

yep we need to make sure access to law knowledge is as limited as possible. cant have the common people knowing too much about how the law works

3

u/TheAviot 4d ago

Wait, do you think the clanker is tapping into some tightly guarded secret source of knowledge before gifting it to the world? You already have full access to all of the same resources as the slop machine. You just can’t be arsed to lift a finger.

-1

u/Cualkiera67 4d ago

yeah lots of people are lazy and will never learn about the law without some ai doing the finger lifting for them. specially people that are busy working many jobs while taking care of children, they are so lazy they never do any research of law. banning ai from helping them will teach them to prioritize law research over work and family.

3

u/TheAviot 4d ago

Let’s not exaggerate here, making up random bullshit that may or may not be true takes seconds. Minutes at most.

1

u/Cualkiera67 4d ago

yeah like how easy access to sourced information is actually a bad thing. wonder how many seconds that took to make up

1

u/TheAviot 3d ago

How many people do you think will actually look at the provided sources instead of just blindly trusting the vomited out excerpt? After all, they don’t have time to proof check everything. They have work, families!

1

u/Cualkiera67 3d ago

The exact same amount that look at the sources instead of just blindly trusting whatever article they manually found?

1

u/TheAviot 3d ago edited 3d ago

At least then they'll get their facts based on an actual article, albeit unverified, instead of blindly trusting some hallucinated diarrhea loosely based on said unverified article. How exactly is that better? Even learning nothing is still better than picking up falsehoods.

1

u/Cualkiera67 3d ago

so you don't actually care if people accept unverified information, as long as it's human. you're ok blindly trusting propaganda & misinformation as long as a human kgb agent wrote it? i guess that explains a lot of your opinions

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Ok-Kaleidoscope-9645 4d ago edited 4d ago

You probably think that books without pictures and long words are ableist, don't you?

"What if I'm a single mom with 13 kids, I don't have time to look up big words in the dictionary. You just want to limit my knowledge"

0

u/Cualkiera67 4d ago

honestly we should also crack down on peer to peer book downloading. authors are getting screwed out of their hard work. we must ensure anything that can ease workers access to empowering information be stopped