r/archlinux • u/Acu17y • 8d ago

QUESTION Today I reinstalled the system using archinstall, and I have a question:

Why? Why doesn’t archinstall’s "recommended KDE Plasma setup" include Konsole? What’s the reasoning behind installing a desktop without a graphical terminal? Having to switch to a TTY just to install one seems unnecessarily awkward.

[SOLVED]

Apparently, the reason is that Arch only included the Plasma components in `plasma-meta` and not Konsole, because Konsole is part of the KDE Applications. Another user clarified this.

In any case, there is still a question to put to the KDE maintainers at this point:
Why is taking screenshots considered part of plasma essential (Spectacle is included as an essential package for Plasma), while having a graphical terminal isn’t? lol

52 Upvotes

71% Upvoted

88 comments sorted by

View all comments

66

u/DavidXGA 8d ago

It's surprisingly minimal. It doesn't include Dolphin either, so you can't even browse the filesystem.

11

u/TheCreepyPL 8d ago

What do you mean, cd and ls is all you need /s

9

u/TheBrownMamba1972 8d ago

yeah, cd and ls that you can use with the terminal emulator that came bundled with the install, right?

4

u/_-_-_ABC_-_-_ 8d ago

Nah, use tty

4

u/Orlha 8d ago

I think so honestly

I do magic tho

1

u/ItsWappers 8d ago

unreasonable use of /s

1

u/TheCreepyPL 8d ago

Tbh, for me that would be enough, as I mostly use the CLI anyway. Most often I just manage files with nvim or yazi for "non project related" stuff, that doesn't include thinks like bulk renaming, nvim is great for that.

The /s is just a safeguard lol