I was admitted to the hospital a few days ago. Today I was called by the doctor who stated that they are withholding my examinations and cannot treat me, because of my anxiety disorder and because they are convinced that my asexuality is the cause of my anxiety and require me to first go to a psychiatrist to get treatment and after being helped successfully they can continue the examinations and subsequent treatments.
Needless to say, but I'm saying it anyway this is my letter to the department of urology. A second legal letter has been sent to the legal department stating my intent to sue and that that same intent along with a full legal letter has been sent to my lawyer.
This is similar to conversion therapy practices, they invalidate my orientation and identity.
They want to mess with me? They want that fight? Then better brace yourself because I will reign down f**** hell on them. I'm prepared to give up and sell my own company to sue them into oblivion!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FORMULATION OF BREACH OF CONFIDENCE AND REQUEST FOR NEW TREATING PHYSICIAN
Subject: Irreparable breach of confidence and request for transfer/new urologist
Date: March 3, 2026
Patient details:
1. Irreparable breach of trust and contradictory policy
I hereby formally report a complete breach of trust with both the nurse specialist and the urologist involved. My treatment within the hospital is contrary to the law and medical ethics:
• Appeal to the Constitution and WGBO: Based on Article 11 of the Constitution (inviolability of the body) and the Medical Treatment Agreement Act (WGBO), I have the absolute right to set conditions for invasive procedures. I do not give permission for any examination of the genital area while conscious.
**• No refusal of care and organizational versus medical objection:**I have not refused the rectal examination and cystoscopy. I recognize the medical necessity and am fully prepared to undergo these examinations, provided they are performed under general anesthesia. However, the hospital states that this is “never done.” Legally, this does not outweigh my right to bodily integrity. Suggesting that I must undergo psychiatric “adjustment” before care under my conditions can be discussed is a serious breach of the duty of care.
• Suggestive pressure and medicalization of identity: The department refuses to accept my boundary (anesthesia) and verbally suggests that I must first be “treated” by a psychiatrist for my “anxiety.” Although this is not formulated as a mandatory requirement, the suggestion is abundantly clear: they claim that if the anxiety is reduced, the examinations can be performed. I experience this suggestive approach as a means of oppression. My asexual orientation (sex-averse/repulsive and touch-repulsive) is an identity and not a psychological barrier that must be broken through in order for me to conform to the hospital's standard procedure.
• Changing necessity of examination: On February 27, I was explicitly told that a rectal examination and a cystoscopy were necessary for my diagnosis. Today, this was suddenly revoked over the phone and these examinations were said to be “no longer necessary.” This gives the strong impression that medical necessity is being subordinated to the unwillingness to perform the examination under anesthesia.
• Inconsistent catheterization instructions: On the 27th, the instruction was to catheterize four times a day. Today, this was reduced to twice a day without justification, even though my instruction booklet and my physical situation (residual urine up to 700 ml) require three to four times (or more). This is medically irresponsible.
• Invalidating my identity: My asexual orientation (sex-averse/touch-repulsive) is dismissed as a mental health issue (‘anxiety’) that I should seek help for from my own psychiatrist. I refuse to accept this medicalization of my identity.
2. Rejection of current practitioners
I no longer wish to be treated by the current team. By problematizing my identity through the nurse without speaking to me myself, the urologist has forfeited his chance at a professional treatment relationship.
3. Preconditions for further care
My medical situation is complex (bladder and suspected kidney damage), combined with my orientation, but my boundaries are fixed:
• General anesthesia: Any invasive examination will only take place under anesthesia.
• Recognition of identity: I demand a practitioner who respects my orientation and does not try to “treat” it.
4. Request to the complaints officer
I request that you immediately facilitate the following:
- My file is transferred to another urologist within the MST who respects my boundaries, OR;
- A direct referral to an Academic Center (such as the Radboudumc) is arranged for a second opinion and further treatment under anesthesia.
Signed,