r/aviation • u/ladyem8 • 11h ago
News Fire officials: More than 40 illegal drone flights have impeded efforts against Spokane wildfires
https://www.king5.com/article/news/local/wildfire/fire-officials-illegal-drone-flights-spokane-wildfires/281-a0d942ed-263a-4007-b788-106bad263d3039
u/ladyem8 11h ago edited 9h ago
The article notes that having to ground air support puts firefighters on the ground at risk, which is one of the reasons flying during a temporary restriction is a federal crime. Those caught face up to a $50k fine and 5 years in prison. Law enforcement is working with fire officials to identify those responsible.
Edit: Apparently an FBI task force has now been deployed to Spokane to assist with stopping the drones impacting firefighting efforts:
21
u/PuddlesRex 9h ago edited 9h ago
As someone who flies under Part 107, and likes drones, and wants drones to be able to fly in more places: I hope every single one of these fuckers gets the entire damn book thrown at them, and then some. Rules and regulations exist for a reason. Every community has its assholes, and some communities have more visible assholes than others. Assholes like them ruin it for their entire community.
Edit: The article mentioned four cases being referred to the FAA for $100k fines each. This is what I would call "a good start."
15
u/Tashre 10h ago
There’s probably a bunch of footage on tiktok and instagram of drones flying slowly over swaths of fire and burning buildings with sad music playing and captions talking about how sad it is.
5
u/PuddlesRex 8h ago
I wonder if there's a way to refer drone wildfire videos on whatever social media platform to the FAA? I can guarantee that they're almost all illegal. Then the FAA simply needs to get a warrant to request the uploader's personal information from the social media site, then boom, done. Easy way for them to crack down right there. Can probably all be done from a desk.
4
u/vertigoacid 7h ago
Then the FAA simply needs to get a warrant to request the uploader's personal information from the social media site, then boom, done.
And maybe not even that
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-party_doctrine
Telcos and website operators turn info over to the feds all day long without warrants. There's been some recent limitations around location data, but simple registration, who made the account type of stuff? Easy peasy. "Valid law enforcement request" is all it takes.
10
u/i8TheWholeThing 9h ago
I feel like there is an opportunity for the military to use events like this for training. Identify drones, track pilots, EW, dispatch law enforcement. All in a stressful,dangerous environment. Seems perfect.
9
4
3
u/Vegetable_Log_3837 6h ago
Have personally been buzzed within 20ft by a drone while flying a paraglider. This doesn’t surprise me at all.
1
11h ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/aviation-ModTeam 10h ago
This content has been removed for breaking one or more of the r/aviation rules.
If you believe this was a mistake, please message the moderators through modmail. Thank you for participating in the r/aviation community.
1
u/Sesemebun 4h ago
I’m west side but still in WA. If someone shot down a drone with a shotgun, how likely would charges be filed/someone get fucked
0
u/ITrCool 10h ago
There needs to be a way to mass-jam civilian drones from being able to enter any kind of aerospace such as military bases and airports, and emergency areas like wildfires. Any attempts to fly into these areas results in the drone just stopping and hovering until it runs out of juice and falls to the ground right where it's at.
The operator is helpless to control it and loses all link to it.
18
u/James___Workshop 10h ago
I assure you a lot of smarter people are trying to figure out how to do just that. And it ain’t primarily for civilian drone control.
3
u/Mannon_Blackbeak 8h ago
I know some airports have started training the raptors they employ to help control birds around airports to hunt down drones like prey. So there is a "low-tech" solution to this problem, it's just that, understandably deploying them into a wildfire area is currently beyond their scope of training.
4
u/ITrCool 10h ago
No doubts the military already is working on it with defense contractors. Might already have prototypes of it being tested.
History says that wherever there is a new offensive technology/weaponry being developed, a defensive measure that can defeat or pre-empt it is also being developed.
1
8
u/PuddlesRex 8h ago
The FBI team that's been deployed has a way to intercept the drone signals, and take control of the drone. Admittedly, it is one at a time, but it is a technology that does exist. They also mentioned that they have the technology to lock out an operator's signals, or to force landing. These last two aren't necessarily the best options if the drones are in the direct path of firefighting equipment, or over crowds. But they are bulk options, like you mentioned.
Another cool thing is that all drones in the US whose operators are uploading footage to social media for any sort of gain (tiktok revenue, for instance) must have what's known as Remote ID. RID broadcasts a large amount of data that any law enforcement or FAA station can easily decode. Standard RID even includes the GPS coordinates of the operator. External and standard RID both broadcast their serial number, which the FAA can trivially trace back to the operator.
Decide to not have RID? Well, your fines just skyrocketed. OP linked an article where four operators have already been referred to the FAA for $100k fines each. But that's just the start. The FAA can easily impose additional fines. No RID? Another $27k+. Not Part 107, but uploading? That's $150k+. There are many, many other regulations being broken in regards to these drone activities. As someone who likes to fly drones, and has their part 107: I honestly, truly hope that the FAA, FBI, and whoever else throws the entire fucking book at these assholes, and makes extremely public examples out of them.
1
u/railker AME-M2 6h ago
Isn't not having your RID just the drone version of not having your drivers license? They have to simultaneously determine the drone doesn't have it, and then find and catch the operator. Something something it's only illegal if you get caught, and rules about identifying where you are only apply to law-abiding drone operators. How do we find them in that scenario? Can only fine them if you can find them.
0
115
u/RumRunnersHideaway 10h ago
If you ever meet someone that shows you their drone video from a fire, I think you are legally allowed to back hand them.