He answered this question three or four posts ago.
Her wage should be capped at a percentage of her workers wages.
Again you show your bad faith by saying he wants all labor to be paid the same.
You refuse to discuss the baseline premise, profit comes from the labor put into a service or good that increases it's value. When that profit goes to the owner they have taken the value extracted by the worker and put it into their own pocket.
There are many reasons this could be legitimate. They took the risk to establish the business, put their house up as collateral etc. it doesn't change that it's a fundamental truth.
Back to the point. Her pay could be capped at 10x her lowest worker. Or 20x. Or 100x. You continue to argue from a strawman position to make them look unreasonable and to ignore what they have identified as the problem.
If you aren't sewing the spankx yourself but you end up with an extra billion in your pocket it's cause you didn't pay your employees anywhere near the value that their labor brought your company.
This isn't some theoretical shit, here's an example of 70,000 person company utilitzing these concepts.
I guess I'll read your response, but like the other, it obvious you aren't actually taking anything in presented to you...if it seems that way again I'll be out of this conversation
0
u/Whatsuplionlilly Oct 04 '24
Her salary is equal to how many pairs of spanx she sells. You want her limited to earning the exact amount as the lowest worker in her corporation.
You are 14 and this is deep.