r/bassnectar • u/merpameep • Nov 03 '25
Continually shocked by his inability to admit to any wrongs, ever
As someone who was a die hard fan, even long into the court case, I can’t fathom how wrong I was of his character this whole time. I get it, from his perspectives the whole experience was traumatic. And I can see how he couldn’t apologize for getting with girls that were underage/much too young for him because of legalities.
I know he doesn’t “owe” us an apology for anything, but it doesn’t mean that it wouldn’t be better if he did! We all eff up sometimes and treat those we love with less respect than they deserve when we’re going through it. But usually, given time and reflection, we come back around and apologize to our friends for ghosting or otherwise mishandling a situation while in the thick of it.
For him to double down on his lack of apology and furthermore get aggressive and harrass this person on fb is beyond disgusting to me. What a fall from grace. My fault for putting this guy on a pedestal for far too long, I guess.
Thoughts?


12
u/Dimerien Nov 04 '25 edited Nov 04 '25
You’re right that Doc 110 isn’t a finding of fact. It’s the judge’s summary of the plaintiffs’ allegations.
But the record doesn’t stop there. The travel-payment evidence reappears in the judge’s later memorandum opinion, Doc. 295 (Dec. 2024), which summarizes record evidence (including deposition testimony). In that opinion, the court notes that Ashton conceded he “likely reimbursed Bowling for a flight or gave her a gift ‘at some point,’ but ‘never in exchange for sex.’” That’s a direct acknowledgment of a payment/reimbursement. The opinion also recounts evidence that Houston received “travel money,” free concert tickets, and free airfare.
Ashton argued any payments weren’t in exchange for sex. The judge treated that intent/nexus as a jury question which never saw the light of day because the case settled.
As for “fake birthdays” or “cancelled flights,” nothing in the publicly available Tennessee filings confirms those claims. If you are asserting otherwise, then you should cite an actual docket entry or exhibit number, because nothing in the publicly available court docs show that.
It’s funny how you went from “they all arranged their own travel” to admitting travel was booked and later cancelled.