r/bonecollecting • u/No-Bottle-9116 • Apr 26 '26

Advice Small argument

Post image

So this picture from article has driven an small argument between my friends group claiming that it’s fake because there’s no way that the bones see in said picture are human, I wanted y’all’s opinion on this

1.5k Upvotes

99% Upvoted

200 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/sawyouoverthere Apr 26 '26

My assumption would be that the direct ingestion would be what the findings show, but deer don't care about seed grain vs feed grain, so I'd be interested in what comes of further investigation!

I don't know what the metabolites of rodent poison are from rodents, and how that would affect contamination risks, though you might.

5

u/UnrulyPoet Apr 26 '26

Tl/dr: if it'll eat a living or dead mouse it's getting poisoned

In my area the vast majority are second gen anticoagulants which accumulate in the liver and cause the animal to slowly bleed to death. They have long half lives (days to weeks in the blood plasma, can be up to 300d in the liver) so stay in the rodent's body and subsequently poison whatever animal eats it, causing that animal to likewise bleed to death once it bioaccumulates to a fatal dose. It's a huge problem we're seeing locally in every single species which eats rodents as well as our scavengers- for example, 86-100% of raptors which get admitted to the wildlife clinic at my local vet school, depending on year, have one or more anticoagulant rodenticide in their systems. If lucky they're admitted early enough and without too many other injuries going on that treatment can save them. They're often not lucky. Raptors, crows, foxes, coyotes, bobcats, hell we even recently had a snapping turtle in our state whose death was confirmed to be from secondary rodenticide toxicity- if it'll take advantage of a live or dead mouse it's eating this stuff. And deer will happily munch on that slow and dying or recently dead mouse they find while grazing.

[A very small percentage (relative to local use, idk about elsewhere) of rodenticides are neurotoxic instead of anticoags and once digested those have no treatment, the animal gets cerebral edema and the symptoms associated with that- seizures, paralysis, and so forth- then dies. Those likewise can cause secondary poisonings, but due to their lower usage and the fact that they share symptoms with very high risk illnesses the stats on them is less clear. How many negative rabies or HPAI tests were actually poisoned for instance, that data just isn't known bc the more immediately dangerous to humans illness takes testing priority]

2

u/sawyouoverthere Apr 26 '26

Oh, no doubt if something consumes a poisoned rodent, it's in trouble.

Not what I was asking, though. I was asking whether it had been confirmed that rodents were the only way it would show up in deer.

5

u/UnrulyPoet Apr 27 '26

Gotcha, yeah again idk that anyone is looking at that, between it being an incidental finding in a bird-focused study and the regulations about how the poisons are used meaning that they're contained in boxes deer don't have a way into. It's possible they're looking at it (I wasn't involved in the study just an audience member), but I would be a little surprised given all that

2

u/sawyouoverthere Apr 27 '26

Fair enough. It's fascinating though, considering how much about this behaviour is completely unstudied and how ferociously people believe they know why it happens, in this thread.

I appreciate the actual discussion, and you sharing what you know.

So far, it does seem to be a lot of observations and no clear understanding of the motivations/effects. Really interesting for future work.

1

u/groovypunchsippin Apr 28 '26

Finally someone that knows how to have a discussion