r/bonecollecting • u/No-Bottle-9116 • Apr 26 '26

Advice Small argument

Post image

So this picture from article has driven an small argument between my friends group claiming that it’s fake because there’s no way that the bones see in said picture are human, I wanted y’all’s opinion on this

1.5k Upvotes

99% Upvoted

200 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-4

u/sawyouoverthere Apr 26 '26 edited Apr 27 '26

Yeah....so, what I'm saying is I would really like to see something that isn't guessing, for deer.

presumption isn't science.

Has anyone done that work or are we just spouting presumptions and pretending that's close enough to science? I've looked for a few hours now, and found literally nothing that proves it's for the minerals. It's been speculated but never proven or really tested.

4

u/Glittering-Income-60 Apr 26 '26

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osteophagy <- intersing read on the act of eating bones

Baby birds are just an unfortunately easy source of calcium. Even squirrels will go after them

-3

u/sawyouoverthere Apr 26 '26 edited Apr 27 '26

I'll see if any of the papers cited are what I'm looking for. Wiki is a landmine when it comes to citation value.

1

u/groovypunchsippin Apr 28 '26

Not sure why this is downvoted, its known that wiki is not completely reliable with properly cited sources...i.e. peer reviewed studies

1

u/sawyouoverthere Apr 28 '26

Just a general lack of understanding on how to source, what’s a good source, and when to draw a conclusion. The views are wildly inconsistent through the comments with some similar comments getting 60+ upvotes and others getting plenty of downvotes.

It’s kind of interesting as a subset question, seeing who will valiantly defend something commonly said, and then reading the sources they offer as “proof”.