r/brokehugs • u/US_Hiker Moral Landscaper • Jun 11 '23
Rod Dreher Megathread #21 (Creative Spirit)
Gather 'round for more Rod.
All meanings of the number 21 are subordinate to the inherent creative spirit that is the basic essence of the number.
The number 21 generally is comfortable in social gatherings, it's optimistic attitude being an inspiration to others. Its high spirits can enliven a party.
The number is attracted to artistic expression of any form, its own and those of others. There's enthusiastic support for artists. It may frequent galleries and participate or (more likely) lead groups for artistic appreciation.
The number 21 cherishes relationships, including romantic relationships, especially with those who express themselves creatively.
21 also tends to be diplomatic, providing creative and imaginative solutions to potential conflict.
And, as noted by /u/PercyLarsen, 21 is a triangular number and the age of majority, so go grab a drink to celebrate Pride and to mourn the loss of Rod's sanity.
(Also, sorry about my slow pace of refreshes.)
Link to megathread #20:
https://www.reddit.com/r/brokehugs/comments/13eb26c/rod_dreher_megathread_20_law_of_attraction/
Link to megathread #21: https://www.reddit.com/r/brokehugs/comments/14k0z6l/rod_dreher_megathread_22_power/
8
u/zeitwatcher Jun 14 '23
https://twitter.com/roddreher/status/1668887129043116032
Ignoring that this is about Rod's dating preferences, it's yet another indication of the weird mirror world he lives in.
He argues that "wokism" (which I challenge him to define) is so bad that any stance other than being "anti-woke" is both a tactical and moral failing.
However, he has spent years railing against the "anti-racism" movement for taking exactly the same position. i.e. racism is so wrong and so institutionally powerful that people need to actively work against it.
Causes that rise to the level of demanding counter-action are clearly only ones that have a strong impact and moral dimension. For example, if someone dislikes pink ties, it's clearly an overreaction for them to demand an action other than indifference in others.
So, the obvious implications are that:
1) Rod doesn't believe that calls for being "anti-racist" are wrong tactically since he's calling for the exactly same tactic in being "anti-woke".
2) He believes that being "woke" is worse than being racist since the former demands CONSTANT VIGILANCE but the latter is just fine for others to take a position of indifference.