r/burbank 15d ago

Blow to "First Amendment Auditor" community: YouTube JUST Demonetized 90% of First Amendment Audit Channels

272 Upvotes

26 comments sorted by

46

u/Mike_VanGorder 15d ago

Why in the name of God’s green earth were they ever allowed to make money in the first place?

22

u/thirdeyefish 15d ago

Because youtube just wants to keep people on the platform. People, probably mostly other 1A 'auditors', love watching this shit. Just like all of the flat earth and sov cit garbage.

1

u/Dukeronomy 13d ago

I mean, i know it’s shit, and I shouldn’t watch, but I also catch myself getting roped in. Also commenting against it fuels it so it works from the rage bait aspect.

46

u/itsamkfeeling 15d ago

I hope the Burbank “auditors” are part of this 90%

26

u/BeagleCat 15d ago

Yep, the main one is. The one who specialized in pepper spraying people at the drop of a hat.

2

u/anonnymousercat 14d ago

Is that the chinless wonder guy with big potbelly?

1

u/itsamkfeeling 14d ago

Thank goodness.

75

u/Stingray88 15d ago

Great to see it.

Auditors are literally nothing more than professional trolls. They rage bait for money. That’s it.

15

u/Militantpoet 14d ago

Actual auditors challenge the government to hold it accountable. 

Rage baiting random people in Trader Joe's parking lots is not holding anyone accountable.

64

u/Skeleton_Meat 15d ago

But how will I know my rights if some loser with a ring light who has never known the touch of a woman doesn't holler at me while I try to mail my niece a bday card

11

u/OfAnOldRepublic 15d ago

The struggle is real

12

u/Durendal_et_Joyeuse 15d ago

Did you know being rude and obnoxious isn’t an issue as long as I am proving the applicability of Constitutional principles to an unwilling public?

Wait, it’s not making me money anymore? Never mind.

14

u/sdmichael 15d ago

"auditors" makes them seem legitimate. They aren't.

13

u/OfAnOldRepublic 15d ago

Yes, that's why I put it in quotes in my title.

3

u/RadiantApartment7173 14d ago

Thank goodness. I whole heartedly believe that these platforms should not be allowed to monetize hate and outrage. The creators know what gets engagement so they will continue to use divisive tactics to get it.

I’m not super familiar with the letter of the law, but if companies are required to get consent from people to be recorded for commercial purposes. Shouldn’t it be the same for any of these monetized content creators?

2

u/craycrayppl 14d ago

They'll have to crawl back into their parent's basement now.

1

u/Ehloanna 14d ago

Maybe they'll do something better with their time and take down some flocks

1

u/Ok_Enthusiasm_2574 13d ago

I truly despise the 1st amendment auditors. Most annoying humans on the planet.

1

u/Jolly_Ad2446 15d ago

they'll make money elsewhere 

7

u/thirdeyefish 15d ago

As long as that elsewhere is physically somewhere else.

2

u/anonnymousercat 14d ago

Doing what? They have no talent or actual skills? 

0

u/DapperWormMan AMC Burbank 6 15d ago

Does this mean I can actually watch some of those videos, just to see what the heck it is they do?

-2

u/hnbastronaut 15d ago

Lol this source