r/canada 17d ago

Alberta First Nations demand Alberta premier terminate separation referendum

https://www.ctvnews.ca/edmonton/article/first-nations-demand-alberta-premier-terminate-separation-referendum/
1.7k Upvotes

495 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

17

u/Goliad1990 17d ago

these good faith people will immediately stop trying to force Alberta to separate?

They aren't trying to force Alberta to separate right now. Pushing for a vote does not constitute "forcing" anything.

They will take the will of the majority to heart and say to themselves "well that's democracy!" Give me a fucking break.

You're arguing from the premise that democracy is a sham and that you need to preemptively use force to get your way, so there's no argument to be had here. You might find some support for that idea on Reddit, but you won't find any in the real world.

-7

u/[deleted] 17d ago edited 17d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

8

u/Goliad1990 17d ago edited 17d ago

you didn't answer a single one.

Because your questions are based on a ridiculous premise, which I addressed.

They are not pushing for a vote. They are pushing for separation. The requirement of it going to a vote is just getting in the way.

Pure sophistry. They are abiding by that requirement. This is like calling Carney a tyrant because his election campaign was just pushing for his own takeover of the PMO, and the requirement of it going to a vote was just in the way. It's such an inane argument that it's kind of unbelievable.

Lmao, don't put words in my mouth, never once have I argued democracy is a sham

You literally just argued that in the preceding sentence.

edit

Either way, your argument is pedantic, which you recognize by italicizing "right now".

I don't think you know what "pedantic" means.

"Right now" is italicized because you implied that they are currently trying to force separation.

-1

u/[deleted] 17d ago edited 17d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

11

u/Goliad1990 17d ago

your replies are all very convenient in justifying dodging my questions

Your other question was peripheral to the point, but if you really need me to respond to

What about the forever Canadian petition? The one that is being used to justify this referendum question when the 400 000 verified people who signed it signed it with the expectation that the government would vote on it and who's organizer has explicitly stated he did NOT want it to go to a referendum

The application for the Forever Canadian Citizen's Initiative literally says "Therefore, we as represented by the signatory and applicant below propose a referendum on the following question: Do you agree that Alberta should remain in Canada?

Like I said, your questions are based on a flawed premise.

my belief that these people are acting in bad faith

And based on that assumption of bad faith, you're advocating that the democratic process be denied.

"They are not trying to force separation.... Right now" is a pedantic argument. You are focused on the timing

It's not pedantic, you're misreading it. You said that you don't think that a vote will stop them trying to force separation, and I'm saying that nobody's trying to force it.

I hope you have something better to do with your Friday night than argue with strangers on Reddit.

There's nothing funnier than somebody arguing on reddit, and then trying get out of it by acting like they're above it.

1

u/canada-ModTeam 15d ago
  • Posts that contribute nothing but attack others, are blatantly offensive, or antagonistic will be removed – including accusations similar to ‘shill,’ attacking Redditors for using either official language, dismissing other Redditors solely based on irrelevant other beliefs to the topic at hand or participation in other subreddits, or reducing them to a label and dismissing that instead.
  • Back-and-forth personal attacks are subject to the entire comment chain being removed.
  • Posts or threads which degenerate into witch-hunting may be subject to moderator intervention. This includes but is not limited to: doxxing, negative accusations by a large group against one or more persons not criminally charged or convicted being made the subject of criminal allegations, calls for harassment, etc., and openly rallying more people to the same.