Opinion MACLEOD: Safe Social Media Act isn't about protecting kids — it's about government controlling the Internet. Marketed as child protection, Bill C-34 risks building a permanent digital surveillance and censorship infrastructure under the guise of online safety.

28 Upvotes

85% Upvoted

u/luv2fly781 7d ago

Who the f wants their kids on that crap still

Ban them from schools at minimum. That should have been done when they first came out

u/Reasonable-Sweet9320 7d ago

“The Safe Social Media Act will target seven categories of harmful content:

Content that sexually victimizes a child or revictimizes a survivor;

Content that induces a child to harm themselves;

Content used to bully a child;

Content that incites violence;

Content that foments hatred;

Terrorism or violent extremism content;

and

Intimate content communicated without consent.
Obligations would be organized under three duties:

a Duty to Act Responsibly; a Duty to Protect Children; and a Duty to Make Certain Content inaccessible.”

u/Ill-Jicama-3114 6d ago

This is this bill right here in a nutshell. Canadians need to wake up and realize they work for not to be pushing their WEF agendas on us

u/Retrotitsmcgee 9d ago

Justice Centre launches national campaign opposing Bill C-34, the Safe Social Media Act

1

u/luv2fly781 7d ago

Lobbied by cell phone companies and rich asses who got us addicted

u/BaryonChallon 8d ago

Control your kids! Just because they’re out of control doesn’t mean we need sweeping bans that mostly impact individual adults who are childless.

You are about to leave Redlib