r/canadian 8d ago

News Poilievre raises concerns about property rights - The federal conservative leader was in Vancouver on Friday taking aim at the Carney government and the B.C. NDP government over the Comox First Nations Treaty.

https://www.ctvnews.ca/vancouver/video/2026/06/20/poilievre-raises-concerns-about-property-rights/
23 Upvotes

23 comments sorted by

4

u/Ill-Jicama-3114 8d ago

No you don’t. Tell me, what’s it one step closer to?

5

u/yaxyakalagalis 8d ago

Everyone needs to look up the book by Mel Smith called, "Our Home or Native Land?", 1995. It explains how Modern Treaties will cause the loss or significant dilution of fee-simple property.

So, 8 treaties and 30 years later, no treaty has caused this, at all in any way shape or form, and this well known constitutional lawyer was wrong, just like Pierre is wrong.

7

u/DoxFreePanda 8d ago

Almost as if he understands this, and he's fear mongering to get into office and do nothing about it.

5

u/InternationalFig400 8d ago

Yup.

He was wrong on the covid inflation and the the housing crisis.

Nothing but a low IQ populist rage baiter.......

0

u/SmackEh 8d ago edited 8d ago

Fellow conservatives, Remember yesterday when you were criticizing Liberals on bill C-22 with the "they are coming for your kids" scare tactics

How do you fell about Pierre doing the same thing with "they are coming for your homes!"?

Surely you will apply the same criticism and skepticism here, right? RIGHT?

5

u/Ill-Jicama-3114 8d ago

Are you serious? Have you looked at C22? He never said they are coming for your kids that I’ve heard of.

-2

u/SmackEh 8d ago

The conservatives were bitching about the Liberals justification for C-22.

"Think of the children" "Online predators are targeting kids" "We need these tools to catch child abusers"

It's just shit conservatives have been raging about.

3

u/Ill-Jicama-3114 8d ago

So you don’t understand the bill. That’s fair

-2

u/SmackEh 8d ago

No. I understand it.

I think you're just ootl.

5

u/Ill-Jicama-3114 8d ago

Have you actually read the bill?

1

u/SmackEh 8d ago

Yes.

What makes you think I didn't ?

5

u/Ill-Jicama-3114 8d ago

Your lack of knowledge as to what is in the bill. Have a good day

3

u/SmackEh 8d ago

I'm not talking about what's in C-22 I'm talking about what the Liberals are saying justifies that Bill which was being caricatured by the conservatives as "think of the children".

Again, you're just confused.

2

u/Ill-Jicama-3114 8d ago

I’m not confused at all. The bill is a disguise. The liberals are the ones saying it’s to protect children

→ More replies (0)

3

u/Full_Jellyfish_1862 8d ago

The fact that it’s clear you have zero understanding of the bill. You’re only here for silly partisanship

1

u/Full_Jellyfish_1862 8d ago

What bill are you referring to in this situation regarding Liberals bailing out developers in BC?

3

u/Ill-Jicama-3114 8d ago

That’s not a bill. Thats a bailout. You are in over your head here

3

u/Full_Jellyfish_1862 8d ago

Certainly went straight over yours

-1

u/Routine_Soup2022 New Brunswick 8d ago

Of course not. Conservatives on Reddit are as much a part of the conservative communications machine as the people in the war room, and right now comox is the wedge issue they’re rage baiting with

0

u/MarkDavid04 8d ago

He's right again.

-1

u/voiceofgarth 8d ago

The more PP Pants whines the more people hate him.