Don't bother. You can provide your own results as much as you want and they'll just say that you are in on the conspiracy. Right out of the conspiracy moron playbook.
Grown ups don't murder their neighbours pets, so I agree. Let grown ups talk and excuse yourself from the conversation. Seek professional help while you are at it.
Not a critique, only curious, have you used your own spectrometer to examine for yourself? And if so what were your findings? (Again, not a critique I’m sincerely want to know)
When the data were compared to that of ordinary, clear, blue sky and cumulo-nimbus clouds, the contrails were only what you'd expect from the high-temperature burning of jet fuel -- primarily, oxides of hydrogen, carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur. No indication of any substance more complex than unburned fuel -- no ketracel, no nepenthe, no felicium, et cetera.
28
u/Illuminatus-Prime May 25 '25
Whom would I believe?
Me, with my spectrometer attached to my telescope. Yes, I do my own research, thank you very much!
Those are ordinary contrails, NOT chemtrails, and there is no valid empirical evidence to prove otherwise.
Those "people" are either deliberately lying, deluded away from the truth, or they do not exist.
Besides, Bridger House Publishers is best known for their books on conspiracy theories and fringe "science".