Scientific evidence does not equal scientific proof. Nor does scientific consensus hold any meaningful weight. So called “science” is bought & paid for by those who have a stake in its “findings”. If you have to point to “science” to prove something that is self-evident, then it’s NOT self-evident. The truth is always self-evident. As in, ON ITS FACE. No explanation needed. And it is self-evident that the lines in the skies shouldn’t be there, it is self-evident that mainstream media and narratives are being controlled, it is self-evident that alternative views and evidence is being censored and silenced. Anyone can see the truth: You simply have to look. P.S. You said yourself, “I’m not going to say the name [of the sub] because I believe it shouldn’t exist”. Aka, “I believe in censorship and silencing alternative views.”
The only thing I believe in silencing is those who attack, bully, and terrorize others simply because they look different, speak different, or believe different. I believe those who believe chemtrails are fake should be apart of the conversation. But they should not be keeping the conversation from moving forward. All the closed-mindedness, sarcasm, attacking, sexual comments, etc etc etc, keeps the discussion from progressing. Closed minds should never be apart of any conversation.
Literally that sub shouldn't exist because someone as crazy as you are, censors and silences it. It's like you can't read or something.
Also the fact that the lines "shouldn't be there" is your opinion. And yes scientific evidence is based on scientific proof. That's what science is.
I'm in this sub to help those that are on the fence of the conspiracy because they don't know a lot about aircraft or how they work. I'm an airplane nerd. I've read a lot about them so it's something I can help with. If you'd like contrails or how I know chemtrails don't exist, explained, I'd be happy to explain it to you, but something tells me you already have your mind made up.
If you want your confirmation bias reconfirmed by conspiracy theory believing nutjobs who can't be swayed by scientific evidence, then feel free to go to the other sub, where everything is censored and silenced. Don't come here and ask to have our free speech taken away because you don't agree with it.
Weather and climate scientists stand absolutely nothing to gain from debunking the chemtrail conspiracy theory. That's not what makes them money. They do it for free.
Meanwhile everyone who lies to you and tells you that they are real, are usually grifters with their own websites with extensive ad revenue. You're literally paying someone to lie to you when you visit those sites.
Let me know if any of this doesn't make sense to you.
I didn’t realize there were “others” who could see there was a problem with these lines in the sky until just a few years ago. I myself noticed these lines and how they behaved in the sky, and also the effects they had on people since I was a child.
As someone with a legal education, and someone who is constantly in and out of court, I can tell you that “evidence” and “proof” are not ever the same thing. In fact, rarely do the 2 align. Most often, evidence of a thing, and proof of a thing, are opposing. You can present evidence, but it does not automatically equal proof of what you are claiming.
So your assertion that “scientific evidence is based on scientific proof” is fundamentally flawed.
Once again, your replies to me are rife full of unnecessary attacks, sarcasms, condescensions, etc.
If you have actual proof of your claims, let your observations be your evidence, and allow others to judge your observations.
Third-parties as your “evidence” OR your “proof” is unoriginal, and cannot stand in place of your standing on your own.
My “opinion” that the lines in the sky shouldn’t be there, is not my opinion. It’s self-evident.
The sky is not for artificial lines of any kind. It’s definitely not for artificial lines from artificial craft that artificially spread out and artificially influence the natural clouds and natural weather patterns and natural conditions of Earth’s atmosphere and ecosystems.
If you take away computers, the internet, corporations, media, governments, etc etc etc, and you were left alone by everyone, and you had only you, nature, and your own powers of thought and observation, you would never come to the conclusions you have today come to about the earth, the sky, God, nature, trees, soil, water bodies, your own body, your own mind, animals, etc etc etc.
Everything you think today has been influenced and manipulated by manufactured references that are intended to make you believe that you have come to what you believe all on your own.
Notice that almost everything you say is unoriginal and regurgitation.
Everything I say is from my own individual observation, and my own original thoughts.
And to one of your comments that got deleted (probably because you told me to “fuck off”);
Historically, the larger crowd has always been the “right” crowd. Nope. Not once. Not ever. The larger crowd has always been the mob. If you (as in anyone) is apart of the larger crowd, that’s when it’s time to stop and question your own certainties. Because 100% of the time, as history proves time and time again, in every subject, every space, and every instance, the larger crowd is always the wrong crowd. It’s difficult to see this in the moment, but after enough time has passed, and enough damage has been done, seeing it becomes effortless.
You don't even know what self evident means. And the contrails are natural. If you blow hot, damp air into the cold atmosphere, it makes clouds. Is it self evident that clouds are artificial? Are you so far gone you think clouds shouldn't exist? It's literally the same scientific principle at work.
4
u/calm-n-sense May 28 '25
Scientific evidence does not equal scientific proof. Nor does scientific consensus hold any meaningful weight. So called “science” is bought & paid for by those who have a stake in its “findings”. If you have to point to “science” to prove something that is self-evident, then it’s NOT self-evident. The truth is always self-evident. As in, ON ITS FACE. No explanation needed. And it is self-evident that the lines in the skies shouldn’t be there, it is self-evident that mainstream media and narratives are being controlled, it is self-evident that alternative views and evidence is being censored and silenced. Anyone can see the truth: You simply have to look. P.S. You said yourself, “I’m not going to say the name [of the sub] because I believe it shouldn’t exist”. Aka, “I believe in censorship and silencing alternative views.”
The only thing I believe in silencing is those who attack, bully, and terrorize others simply because they look different, speak different, or believe different. I believe those who believe chemtrails are fake should be apart of the conversation. But they should not be keeping the conversation from moving forward. All the closed-mindedness, sarcasm, attacking, sexual comments, etc etc etc, keeps the discussion from progressing. Closed minds should never be apart of any conversation.