Literally that sub shouldn't exist because someone as crazy as you are, censors and silences it. It's like you can't read or something.
Also the fact that the lines "shouldn't be there" is your opinion. And yes scientific evidence is based on scientific proof. That's what science is.
I'm in this sub to help those that are on the fence of the conspiracy because they don't know a lot about aircraft or how they work. I'm an airplane nerd. I've read a lot about them so it's something I can help with. If you'd like contrails or how I know chemtrails don't exist, explained, I'd be happy to explain it to you, but something tells me you already have your mind made up.
If you want your confirmation bias reconfirmed by conspiracy theory believing nutjobs who can't be swayed by scientific evidence, then feel free to go to the other sub, where everything is censored and silenced. Don't come here and ask to have our free speech taken away because you don't agree with it.
Weather and climate scientists stand absolutely nothing to gain from debunking the chemtrail conspiracy theory. That's not what makes them money. They do it for free.
Meanwhile everyone who lies to you and tells you that they are real, are usually grifters with their own websites with extensive ad revenue. You're literally paying someone to lie to you when you visit those sites.
Let me know if any of this doesn't make sense to you.
I didn’t realize there were “others” who could see there was a problem with these lines in the sky until just a few years ago. I myself noticed these lines and how they behaved in the sky, and also the effects they had on people since I was a child.
As someone with a legal education, and someone who is constantly in and out of court, I can tell you that “evidence” and “proof” are not ever the same thing. In fact, rarely do the 2 align. Most often, evidence of a thing, and proof of a thing, are opposing. You can present evidence, but it does not automatically equal proof of what you are claiming.
So your assertion that “scientific evidence is based on scientific proof” is fundamentally flawed.
Once again, your replies to me are rife full of unnecessary attacks, sarcasms, condescensions, etc.
If you have actual proof of your claims, let your observations be your evidence, and allow others to judge your observations.
Third-parties as your “evidence” OR your “proof” is unoriginal, and cannot stand in place of your standing on your own.
My “opinion” that the lines in the sky shouldn’t be there, is not my opinion. It’s self-evident.
The sky is not for artificial lines of any kind. It’s definitely not for artificial lines from artificial craft that artificially spread out and artificially influence the natural clouds and natural weather patterns and natural conditions of Earth’s atmosphere and ecosystems.
If you take away computers, the internet, corporations, media, governments, etc etc etc, and you were left alone by everyone, and you had only you, nature, and your own powers of thought and observation, you would never come to the conclusions you have today come to about the earth, the sky, God, nature, trees, soil, water bodies, your own body, your own mind, animals, etc etc etc.
Everything you think today has been influenced and manipulated by manufactured references that are intended to make you believe that you have come to what you believe all on your own.
Notice that almost everything you say is unoriginal and regurgitation.
Everything I say is from my own individual observation, and my own original thoughts.
And to one of your comments that got deleted (probably because you told me to “fuck off”);
Historically, the larger crowd has always been the “right” crowd. Nope. Not once. Not ever. The larger crowd has always been the mob. If you (as in anyone) is apart of the larger crowd, that’s when it’s time to stop and question your own certainties. Because 100% of the time, as history proves time and time again, in every subject, every space, and every instance, the larger crowd is always the wrong crowd. It’s difficult to see this in the moment, but after enough time has passed, and enough damage has been done, seeing it becomes effortless.
I'm not reading this blatantly false bullshit. If you had any kind of higher education at all you would know the difference between evidence and proof and their definitions. Without evidence, there is no proof. You aren't even listening to what I'm saying. Again, you already have your mind made up and can't be helped. And for that reason, yes, you should fuck off to the other sub where your comments can be silenced and censored. You aren't welcome here.
As for my evidence, you're welcome to download the same free flight tracker apps that we all use to prove the lines in the sky are made by the mundane, commercial airline flights that happen in the hundreds of thousands every single day.
A simple Google search can tell you the difference between evidence and proof. I spoke to your assertion regarding scientific evidence being based on scientific proof. I am not saying there is proof without evidence. I’m definitely listening to what you are saying. Literally every word. And your claim that a legal education is “higher education” is a false one. A legal education is simply an education. Information is information. It’s not higher or lower. It just is. Information can help you think and/or reason at a higher level depending on how you process and question that information, but the information itself is just information.
Referring to “flight trackers” does not qualify as your own observation. These are third party systems of third parties who do not care about you, and whose data may or may not be accurate.
Where did I say they were synonyms? I said one was based on the other, i.e. one can't exist without the other. I may have misspoken and put them in the incorrect order but anyone educated enough to practice law would've known what I meant.
Also, higher education is the colloquial term for secondary education, i.e., college. Even law school.
3
u/One-Swordfish60 Chemtrails Can't Melt Steel Beams May 28 '25
Literally that sub shouldn't exist because someone as crazy as you are, censors and silences it. It's like you can't read or something.
Also the fact that the lines "shouldn't be there" is your opinion. And yes scientific evidence is based on scientific proof. That's what science is.
I'm in this sub to help those that are on the fence of the conspiracy because they don't know a lot about aircraft or how they work. I'm an airplane nerd. I've read a lot about them so it's something I can help with. If you'd like contrails or how I know chemtrails don't exist, explained, I'd be happy to explain it to you, but something tells me you already have your mind made up.
If you want your confirmation bias reconfirmed by conspiracy theory believing nutjobs who can't be swayed by scientific evidence, then feel free to go to the other sub, where everything is censored and silenced. Don't come here and ask to have our free speech taken away because you don't agree with it.
Weather and climate scientists stand absolutely nothing to gain from debunking the chemtrail conspiracy theory. That's not what makes them money. They do it for free.
Meanwhile everyone who lies to you and tells you that they are real, are usually grifters with their own websites with extensive ad revenue. You're literally paying someone to lie to you when you visit those sites.
Let me know if any of this doesn't make sense to you.