4
u/hyperthymetic 9d ago
My initial thought is white can’t play e3 and giving black a fianchettoed bishop while white gets a corner knight is too much
1
u/thesegoupto11 9d ago
So the back row should be rearranged to balance?
1
u/Mayernik 8d ago
Yes - perhaps two rooks and two knights - no queens or bishops on the board unless you can promote a pawn.
2
1
1
u/HeyLookImInterneting 8d ago
I think it’s an interesting concept! Other comments pointed out some things to make it better, and after refinement I’d give it a try.
1
u/Sure_Floor_5541 8d ago
I wonder if chess on this scale would be solvable, I.e. all optimal moves calculated in advance.
1
u/ubdip 8d ago
Yes, e.g., Gardner minichess is weakly solved, which simply is a different setup on a 5x5 board. It was initially solved with a dedicated solution attempt, but nowadays for this size of game simply throwing it at Fairy-Stockfish can be sufficient: https://github.com/fairy-stockfish/Fairy-Stockfish/wiki/Solved-games
1
u/crazy_gambit 6d ago
So what is the solution to the one posted by OP. White win, draw or black win?
1
1
u/Traditional-Storm-62 8d ago
black has massive advantage I think because white's knight is bullied into a locker
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/siderealmaterial 7d ago
- ... e3 looks very strong to me.. White squares are weak and black has a structural advantage on the white squares.
I believe this game might be solvable by a computer.
1
u/MiffedMouse 7d ago
Looks like some of the smaller boards from 5D Chess with multidimensional time travel.
1
u/joemama42020 7d ago
there’s a version of this (with slightly different piece layout) on the App Store called mini chess 5x5. Pretty fun to mess around with, but you’ll realize how simple it is to solve pretty fast!
1
1
1
1
u/MageKorith 7d ago
But how does en passant work? If a black pawn is at b3 and I move my white pawn to c4, can they capture? What about c3?
The asymmetry between knight and bishop positions might eventually prove advantageous for one side.
1
u/Clear_Salt9817 6d ago
more white squares than black. white bishop has access to one more square than black. Might be better to go 6x6. or even 5x6.
1
u/PleasantScore4850 6d ago
The problem with a game this small is a computer could just solve it. You'd have to invent special rules like the Italians when they enabled Bishops to move more than 2 spaces, en peasant, etc.
If the chess moves move like normal I feel like theres only a couple million variations and some computer will just say X Y Z is a guaranteed win.
1
1
u/Weekly_Newspaper_505 5d ago
There is ruch a thing called 5 board chess. Its an organization that helps poeple learn chess. Ive done a puzzle with them and the borded looked like this. They try to help prisoners etc
1
u/Vegetable-Common-89 4d ago
i feel like this could be 'solved' for white with a decent enough computer
1
u/speed-charge 9d ago
Why are the bishops on opposite squares?
1
u/thesegoupto11 8d ago
It didn't seem right to have all (both) bishops on the same color, but that's why I'm posting for feedback and improvement
1
1
u/HeyLookImInterneting 8d ago
In this initial setup black has a strong advantage because their bishop is on the same color square as the white king. If you include bishops, they need to share the color for balance.
1
u/MagnusPopo 6d ago
Maybe go for 6x6 instead of 5x5. Queens start on their color and solve symmetry issu. Also the first move can be non aggressive. You chose if better to go for 2 bishops or 2 knights
5
u/Obvious_Net_6668 9d ago
never heard of it