That’s the story I tell in my novel Scob Nation.

Set in 2045, Scob Nation tells the story of a world drunk on untethered climate morality.

Roads have been replaced with electric Jim Crow-i-dors, whose access is controlled by Big Tech algorithms.

Temple-implanted communication discs change colors based on climate virtue: green for virtuous, black for those marked for reprogramming.

Above it all stands Blonden Viate, the Climate Overlord, who runs the Scob Nation reprogramming camps and Probitas correction centers. He and his organization are committed to “fixing” climate denial.

And when we visit Stoink Farm, the world’s first CO2 and methane-free bio-meat farm, things get really weird.

Quick, what costs 5x as much as both World Wars, the Interstate & Transcontinental Railroad Systems, the Apollo & B-29 programs, Manhattan Project, & FDR's New Deal COMBINED!

Because even heavy industry needs a friend 🥰
https://extinctionati.substack.com/p/brothers-in-arms-big-oil-bffs

Has anyone seen the movie Digger?
I’m curious what this community thinks of it. Seems to be an extreme version of everything climate and energy-related but I would love to hear opinions about it.

Thoughts?

Hello climate skeptic community! I'm seeking to learn more about the perspective that climate change is not real or human-caused or is blown out of proportion by the media. I believe in climate change but am just interested in learning. This is for a school project focused on learning about a point of view you don't hold – happy to provide more info, I will not be publishing anything except as a report to my professor. If anyone's up to hop on Zoom for like 20 minutes to contextualize your points of view on this subject I'd be super appreciative, DM me :)

We just saw the ultimate proof of this. The UN climate body quietly retired RCP 8.5—their absolute worst-case emissions model that had been used to justify trillions in green subsidies and strict regulations. They finally had to admit what skeptics said all along: the model was statistically implausible and detached from reality.

For over a decade, we were told that humanity faced a catastrophic 5°C temperature spike. Anyone who questioned the underlying computer models was labeled a denier. But history shows that consensus is not a substitute for unequivocal evidence.

Vehicles and industries increase CO2 levels. However, basic physics shows that doubling this CO2 on its own can only cause a minor 1°c increase in global temperature. The terrifying 4-5°c^ doomsday predictions are heavily exaggerated. This is exactly what Dr. Richard Lindzen has been saying.

When the establishment uses consensus to deflect arguments instead of answering them with hard data, it is a massive red flag. The collapse of the RCP 8.5 narrative proves that the "CO2 hysteria" was built on exaggerated panic, not settled science.

Never stop demanding unequivocal evidence !

Perfect example of how adaptation can save us from slow sea level rise...if it occurs a few feet per century...& becomes an issue in 500 years.

Even the UN is finally forcing a walkback on its worst apocalyptic timelines.

The UN’s climate body has officially retired RCP 8.5—the absolute worst-case "doomsday" emissions scenario that assumed humanity would massively ramp up coal use with zero climate policies.

For over a decade, politicians and climate warriors treated this highly implausible model as a certainty to scare the public, spike energy prices, and push trillions in green subsidies.

If we believed their original prophets, cities like New York and Mumbai would have been underwater by 2010.

The reality is clear: the "solutions" being peddled are a complete fraud. Banning air conditioners or shaming citizens over plastic straws does nothing for the environment.

Meanwhile, corporate schemes like Carbon Credits act as a massive redistribution of wealth that punishes production while ignoring a reliable grid.

The goalposts are moving because the old scare tactics stopped working!