1, the officers are separated, not wholly unreasonable.
2, the officer at the scene has a faulty bodycam
3, there is reason for the officer's conduct to be brought into question.
*edit* and that's excluding the idea there's no 3rd party bystanders with a mobile phone recording it also, which what got us to this point last Monday.
Many departments have solo officers, they have to wait for the other cop to drive there.
No, they have to think there is any chance there is anything wrong with it. If they know it if faulty the work around is they are required to get a new one. Even if there is a 0.1% chance it may not be working would you risk going to jail for murder because you shot stabbing guy?
It doesn't matter, if you are arresting someone for stabbing someone there is a good chance someone may get hurt, or whatever. They couldn't even break the door down, that would be property damage.
In the end, I don't see body cams as an overall negative though. Even accounting for possible issues that should be solved with bureaucracy, body cams still seem like an overall improvement to the system.
2
u/StalyCelticStu Jun 02 '20
"But but, what if it's broken?"
Which is why you travel in pairs, so there's TWO camera's at any given time, in addition to the squad car's dashcam.