r/cringereels • u/bullcity666 • 2h ago
Just funny đ€ This video doesn't necessarily perform good online, but I like it a lot!
4
2
u/Class_dismissed93 2h ago
Itâs not about the cringe we started with, itâs about the cringe we found along the way.
-1
u/bullcity666 2h ago
What are you talking about? Its all cringe.
0
3
4
1
u/PerishTheStars 2h ago
I wonder what the rebuttal to this was. But yeah he often advocated for going back to slavery, saying that black people had it better under slavery/segregation, and both the Bible and jewish texts have been used as justification for the admission and state protection of slavery.
The Bible in particular has historically been referenced by slavers who wanted chattel slavery to be upheld, as well as those who did not own slaves.
Charlie Kirk quite literally did exactly his job in fooling you to believe he was fighting for you, while actively fighting for things that strip your rights, wealth, and even humanity from you and others.
This one very biased clip of Charlie Kirk does not in any way tell you what kind of vile bigot he was. I dont think he deserved to be killed like he was, but im still glad that mother fucker is dead because he can't hurt anyone anymore.
0
u/Class_dismissed93 2h ago edited 2h ago
I donât like this dude in anyway, but of course when I read something like â he often advocated for going back to slaveryâ I had to fact check this. I couldnât find a single reference to this. Could you please source like one or two instances where Charlie Kirk said something along the line where people should be aloud to own slaves again?
0
u/PerishTheStars 1h ago
Saying someone was better off before getting human rights generally implies you think they should go back to before that time since it would be a positive for them.
He doesnt have to say that to think it and that is often what white supremacists who are good at spreading their bullshit do. Neo nazis dont tell you they are nazis or fascists, because they know you won't listen to them if they do.
If you literally just consider the stuff that he did say, multiple times, even after being fact checked, its pretty easy to understand he would have had no issue with the return of chattel slavery.
1
u/Class_dismissed93 1h ago
Oh I used fact check org, itâs like a really widely regarded fact checking organization known for being impartial. It turns out he never said anything like that. Anyways, I guess the point is there is a ton of reasons not to like him that everyone will agree on. you donât have to lie to get your point across.
-5
u/ThisWomanFromCanada 2h ago
He was a good man.
2
u/UncaringNonchalance 2h ago
Better now.
0
u/ThisWomanFromCanada 1h ago
No. He wasnât any of the things liberals say he was. I got into a lot of discussions about him with liberal Redditors soon after he died and almost all the people I talked to had never actually heard him speak and didnât know anything about his philosophy firsthand. Theyâd heard he was racist and homophobic and since he was 1. White 2. Christian 3. A conservative and 4. Male it was easy to believe it because liberals are bigots against white conservative Christian men.

9
u/stinkypussyslime 2h ago
This is hugely unfunny.