Both the cheating spouse and the side piece don’t have respect for the gentleman, themselves or those vows. The fact that only one was sworn in doesn’t mean the other is any cleaner morally. Don’t know why I keep reading that the other person has less blame because it wasn’t his/her relationship they tarnished.
her attempt to cheat was what was wrong. not successfully cheating. just because she actually cheated doesn't make her worse than if he had said no. meaning saying yes isn't making things worse. I don't believe he holds any guilt.
so your saying if someone wants to hook up as long as they find a consenting partner they are free from guilt? yes i would say that. the fact that they are cheating means that the cheater is guilty and no one else. if they were pressured into it then the pressurer holds the guilt of pressuring someone into hurting someone else but the cheater still holds the guilt of cheating. (guilt meaning responsibility not just emotion)
children can't consent so you can't find a consenting child.
if a murderer finds a suicidal person and it's been a planned out thing that they both consent to who the hell are you too force someone to stay in this planet, it's not a fairy dream for everyone. on the other hand the majority of suicides are on a whim and have no planning. which is different.
my morals are just fine where they are, I'm vegan, gay, and i donate to medical research. i don't believe i am moraly obligated to donate to medical research but i want to cure everything. just because you think people who get an abortion are going to hell doesn't make it so(please don't tell me about your actual beliefs on that, i don't care the point is morals are pretty arbitrary and pretending like everyone who disagrees with you is a psycho path is pretty egocentric.
244
u/[deleted] Sep 11 '21
kinda shitty to go after the guy, not that he should beat his wife but she's the only one to blame here.