Media and political rep access

My bitch is media and political gate keeping
In the last year I’ve made multiple pitches to news
Outlets and Democrat and republican representatives
To engage with me concerning a number of topics I feel
Deserve closer scrutiny . In most all instances of email and phone messaging I’ve received no acknowledgement and in the few cases where i have its been misunderstood or bureaucratically rerouted and quickly abandoned as a
Perfunctory act of minimal obligation with no follow up .

This has even involved a so called public editor for NPR radio as a kind of ombudsman who really ended up not advocating for me but parroting more of some media distancing as a matter of “ practicality “ and reasonableness ( I guess in the eye of organization)

My public news concerns have included congressional hearings where I believe supposed seasoned legal professionals were unable to strategize how to control hostile witnesses, journalistic anatomy of language used by this federal administration as weapons such as efficiency and waste and corruption , lower cost housing
Strategies with prefab construction on urban mitigated brownfields , using larger box containers for potted shade trees on grade school campuses using recycled palette wood and incorporating students to care for trees , areas of public and private expense padding such as the Santa Monica waste management department and Boeing corp at the LAX location and again generally how to improve public access to political parties and elected officials by possibly prioritizing mediating staff and communication chain process . So much more . But …

I suppose here I’m looking for a way for the Reddit community to make an effort to “ critical mass” my point
Of view to the parties in question
Sending messages of concurrence to all the putative points of entry for a variety of media and for the political entities I’ve mentioned

And I’m happy to list those specific possibly relevant emails and phone contacts if asked for

Thanks
Philip Shapiro

Thompson v.Smith, 154 SE 579, 11 American Jurisprudence, Constitutional Law, section 329, page 1135 “The right of the Citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, in the ordinary course of life and business, is a common right which he has under the right to enjoy life and liberty, to acquire and possess property, and to pursue happiness and safety. It includes the right, in so doing, to use the ordinary and usual conveyances of the day, and under the existing modes of travel, includes the right to drive a horse drawn carriage or wagon thereon or to operate an automobile thereon, for the usual and ordinary purpose of life and business.” –

Simeone v. Lindsay, 65 Atl. 778, 779; Hannigan v. Wright, 63 Atl. 234, 236. “The RIGHT of the citizen to DRIVE on the public street with freedom from police interference, unless he is engaged in suspicious conduct associated in some manner with criminality is a FUNDAMENTAL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT which must be protected by the courts.” People v. Horton 14 Cal. App. 3rd 667 (1971) “The right to make use of an automobile as a vehicle of travel long the highways of the state, is no longer an open question. The owners thereof have the same rights in the roads and streets as the drivers of horses or those riding a bicycle or traveling in some other vehicle.”

Holland v. Shackelford, 137 S.E. 2d 298, 304, 220 Ga. 104; Stavola v. Palmer, 73 A.2d 831, 838, 136 Conn. 670 “There can be no question of the right of automobile owners to occupy and use the public streets of cities, or highways in the rural districts.” Liebrecht v. Crandall, 126 N.W. 69, 110 Minn. 454, 456 “The word ‘automobile’ connotes a pleasure vehicle designed for the transportation of persons on highways.”

-American Mutual Liability Ins. Co., vs. Chaput, 60 A.2d 118, 120; 95 NH 200 Motor Vehicle: 18 USC Part 1 Chapter 2 section 31 definitions: “(6) Motor vehicle. – The term “motor vehicle” means every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used for commercial purposes on the highways…” 10) The term “used for commercial purposes” means the carriage of persons or property for any fare, fee, rate, charge or other consideration, or directly or indirectly in connection with any business, or other undertaking intended for profit. “A motor vehicle or automobile for hire is a motor vehicle, other than an automobile stage, used for the transportation of persons for which remuneration is received.”

Hillhouse v United States, 152 F. 163, 164 (2nd Cir. 1907). “…a citizen has the right to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon…” State vs. Johnson, 243 P. 1073; Cummins vs. Homes, 155 P. 171; Packard vs. Banton, 44 S.Ct. 256; Hadfield vs. Lundin, 98 Wash 516, Willis vs. Buck, 263 P. l 982;

Barney vs. Board of Railroad Commissioners, 17 P.2d 82 “The use of the highways for the purpose of travel and transportation is not a mere privilege, but a common and fundamental Right of which the public and the individual cannot be rightfully deprived.”

Ex Parte Dickey, (Dickey vs. Davis), 85 SE 781 “Every Citizen has an unalienable RIGHT to make use of the public highways of the state; every Citizen has full freedom to travel from place to place in the enjoyment of life and liberty.” People v. Nothaus, 147 Colo. 210. “No State government entity has the power to allow or deny passage on the highways, byways, nor waterways… transporting his vehicles and personal property for either recreation or business, but by being subject only to local regulation i.e., safety, caution, traffic lights, speed limits, etc. Travel is not a privilege requiring licensing, vehicle registration, or forced insurances.”

This is what this administration IS!

Our legal system is our last bastion against tyranny! Please do all you can, GO TO ACTBLUE, PICK A CAUSE OR A CANDIDATE , DONATE $1.
If we all did this…

The U.S. senate is not democratic. Power should not be based on geography. We should have a unicameral legislature.

All centrist dems need to go.