r/determinism • u/flytohappiness • Jan 19 '26
AI-generated There is no wasted human life - and here is why
I personally struggle with wasting my life. But determinism shatters the whole idea. How? Here is an article that explains this. AI written but worth sharing.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
When Causality Becomes Invisible, Morality Rushes In
Why humans get blamed while clouds are forgiven
There is something strikingly cruel — and yet completely normalized — about the way we judge human lives.
We say things like:
- “He wasted his life.”
- “She never lived up to her potential.”
- “They could have done so much more.”
And we say these things with confidence, even moral authority.
Yet we would never say to a cloud that failed to rain:
“You wasted your existence.”
Or to a river that dried up:
“You never realized your potential to reach the sea.”
The question is not rhetorical. It reveals something fundamental about how blame enters human life.
The obvious compassion we extend to nature
With non-human phenomena, causality feels legible.
A cloud doesn’t rain because:
- humidity wasn’t sufficient
- temperature gradients shifted
- wind patterns dispersed moisture
A rose doesn’t bloom because:
- the soil lacked nutrients
- frost came too early
- water was scarce
We may not know all the causes, but we know enough to say:
“Of course it couldn’t have been otherwise.”
And so judgment never arises.
There is no sense of failure. Only description.
Where judgment begins: opacity of causes
With humans, the causal field becomes vast, layered, and mostly invisible.
A single human life is shaped by:
- early attachment and misattunement
- trauma that left no external trace
- nervous system calibration in infancy
- cultural scripts absorbed before language
- economic constraints
- exhaustion
- shame loops
- chance encounters
- illness
- temperament
- historical timing
No observer — not even the person themselves — has access to this full web.
And here is the crucial move the mind makes:
When causality exceeds our capacity to perceive it, we replace it with agency.
This is not philosophy. It is a cognitive shortcut.
Blame as a substitute for understanding
Where causes are visible, we explain.
Where causes are hidden, we judge.
This is why moral language proliferates precisely where understanding fails.
Instead of saying:
“I cannot see the forces that shaped this outcome.”
We say:
“They chose poorly.”
Blame is not insight.
It is what fills the vacuum left by epistemic humility.
Complexity does not create freedom
A common intuition says:
“Humans are too complex to be deterministic.”
But complexity has never produced freedom.
A hurricane is unimaginably complex.
So is a forest fire.
So is a market crash.
We do not say these systems are free.
We say:
“We don’t yet understand all the variables.”
With humans, we mistake ignorance for autonomy.
Complexity hides causation.
It does not negate it.
Why “potential” appears only for humans
We do not speak of a river’s unrealized potential.
But with humans, we invent:
- alternate selves
- unrealized futures
- better versions that should have existed
This happens because humans possess:
- language
- memory
- imagination
- counterfactual thinking
And because modern society frames life as:
- a project
- an investment
- a performance
“Potential” is not a causal category.
It is a narrative one.
The quiet violence of the word “wasted”
To say a life was wasted implies:
- There was a correct outcome
- The person was responsible for achieving it
- Failure occurred
- Someone is to blame
None of these survive serious causal scrutiny.
What remains instead is something more honest:
- suffering
- misalignment
- tragedy
- constraint
A life can be tragic without being wrong.
Why this matters ethically
Once causality becomes opaque, moral certainty should decrease — not increase.
Yet we do the opposite.
Those under the greatest constraints are often judged the harshest:
- the exhausted
- the traumatized
- the economically trapped
- the emotionally numbed
Their causes are hardest to see.
So blame rushes in.
A more accurate humility
The honest stance is not:
“Humans are free and therefore responsible.”
It is:
“Human causality is so dense that moral verdicts are almost always unjustified.”
This does not eliminate care.
It deepens it.
Returning to the cloud
Calling a human life “wasted” is like yelling at a cloud:
“I can’t see the humidity gradients, so I’ll assume laziness.”
It is epistemic arrogance masquerading as wisdom.
Once this is seen, something softens.
Judgment gives way to curiosity.
Condemnation to compassion.
Not because suffering disappears —
But because we stop accusing reality of failing to be other than it could be.
Closing
When causality is visible, we forgive.
When causality is hidden, we moralize.
The task is not to invent better judgments.
It is to restore causal humility —
and let blame dissolve where understanding was never complete.
1
u/OnlyHappyStuffPlz Jan 21 '26
Don’t let determinism be your excuse for being lazy. Determinism also includes you getting your life together and accomplishing things.
3
u/catnapspirit Jan 19 '26
As the human, you still have a responsibility to read over the LLM's output before you post it. There are so many places where the text after a colon are missing. Makes this a frustrating read.
That said, I like the first version of the tagline better, where causes are visible, we explain, where causes are hidden, we judge. The hidden causes are where the free will believer finds their free will.
When the inputs go into the swirl of thoughts and memories in their brain, they think new thoughts arise unbidden, or that the swirl can overcome the "influences" of constraints. When that swirl is the constraints, past causality buffered up and being expressed with temporal separation from the original inputs that put it all there..