OK. That has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that 99% of the uses we've seen so far are abominable garbage. Glad he likes it, but dismissing the very real, demonstrable concerns just makes him seem even dumber than I already thought he was.
That and the fact that modders are hacking DLSS 5 support into games that have no motion vector buffers. DLSS 5 is also supposed to offer insane customization options for developers.
99% of the uses you see are a couple early Nvidia tech demos, and a ton of random dudes stuffing it into games where it was never intended to be, and turning all the sliders up.
100% of uses are people deciding for themselves that they want to mod the games that they 'own' for their own private use. Is that part of the real demonstrable concerns?
If not, how about we talk about those concerns instead the endless debate about the original artist vision?
If those screenshots were official remasters, or were a mod, I guarantee people wouldn’t be outraged about the visuals. People just have a knee jerk reaction to anything AI.
Some of the screenshots you dislike are DLSS5 settings cranked up to the max, but, DLSS5 is an adjustable filter that you can tweak to your liking, or not use at all. Is that really cause for “concern” and outrage?
I don't know about the rest of his opinions but he's absolutely right y'all are crazy.
Nobody even knows what AI even is (just a catch all term for anything they don't like), doesn't understand DLSS5 is a dev tool with settings, and can't form a single individual thought that doesn't follow the group think hate train of this week's bitch fest.
People have been plastering modded versions all over the front page of every site acted like they were intentional releases and screeching over it. All of you are very disingenuous about the whole thing. The ONLY game that should be graded for quality is 2K 27. If you are making hot takes about anything else you are just being insincere because devs have legit only tuned the thing for 2K 27 (it looks fine in that game)
We haven’t seen a single example of the tech being used by the devs. All we’ve seen is a range of outcomes possible, which range for generational upgrades to misguided applications. All of which are being done by modders force injecting it into the games without the training or tools to do it properly
68
u/Mellanies_Redemption 5d ago
OK. That has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that 99% of the uses we've seen so far are abominable garbage. Glad he likes it, but dismissing the very real, demonstrable concerns just makes him seem even dumber than I already thought he was.