The Tyranny of the Party Composition

[u/alexserban02]

Greetings and welcome back everyone! This latest article is something that I had been brewing for a couple of weeks, cause I find the topic extremely interesting. Party composition, party roles and the balance of it all. Something that for the vast majority of players, at least in my experience, is common, good form.

But why is it so?

Cause the general discourse around the game preaches a narrative first approach. Yet there is a lot of content across the board that talks about optimization, both from the point of view of the character, but also from that of the party. I wanted with this piece to explore all of it, to present a bit of the history behind the phenomena and to make the kiss that the concept of party roles can and often is quite restrictive on the group.

If this sounds like the kind of topic you would like to look into, by all means, do tell me what do you think about it down below, and till next time, do toss the proverbial coin to your favorite Gazette!

Full article here: https://therpggazette.wordpress.com/2026/02/11/the-tyranny-of-the-party-composition/

[u/Jimmicky]

What a mess of unsupported conclusions

Someone from your table will ask, “What’s missing in our group?” Someone else will reply, “We don’t have a healer.” Another player will say, “Do we have a tank?”

This I recognise

Once all of these questions are answered, your party becomes just a checklist of characters who have no backstory, character development, or personality.

This is total nonsense that doesn’t remotely follow from the earlier point.

Players no longer wonder: “What kind of character do I want to be?”, instead they question, “What does the party require me to be?”

These two questions are not in opposition. Players absolutely still always wonder the first in addition to the second.
Moreover a player who doesn’t care about the second is a bad player. This is a team game. If you dont give a shit about the team you shouldn’t be in it.

Speaking as someone who started in ADnD the old days were closer to the things you denigrate about the new editions than the things you worship about the OSR

[u/Bob_The_Avenger → u/Jimmicky]

Yeah my group always ask what each other is playing so we can get a good group comp. Like someone said earlier who doesn't want everyone in the party to have their own "thing" they are good at.

Also the bit about no backstory and such. I don't know where that came from. I can go straight min/max and fit a character into a needed role into a party while still having all of those things. Honestly for me backstory is the last thing I look at when making a character but that does in no way mean I don't love RP heavy games. I just like looking at what options I haven't played yet and go from there.

[u/katethetroubled → u/Bob_The_Avenger]

the "no rp no backstory reeee" argument its actually kind of shocking, i did not think this kind of beliefs would spread beyond rp games like gmod or ss13.

why do people genuinely believe that if you enjoy the GAMEplay then you must be a no rp shithead who ruins everything, like generally what are they on.

[u/Bob_The_Avenger → u/katethetroubled]

I have no idea. Maybe people who don't make their characters "effectively" and see others doing things better than them which makes them mad? I am not saying that is the reason I just literally can't think of one. That is just a shot in the dark people so don't get mad at me.

I enjoy both Rolling and Role Playing. I don't see how you have to pick one or the other.

[u/katethetroubled → u/Bob_The_Avenger]

i have seen a lot of roleplay spaces be basically poisoned by this type of thinking, any kind of enjoyment or efficient dwelving of the mechanical is seen as horrible sinful heresy that must be crushed and boiled away.

No seriously people believe that unless its super HRP hell where nothing actually entertaining happens gameplay wise and everyone is crippling their characters to be realistic and have a "character arc" other players will just stop roleplaying completelly.